Re: firestarter

2015-09-30 Thread Alex Vong
t; wrote: > Thanks for the Info. I'll look for another IP table manager. > I'm always open to suggestions. > > On 09/29/2015 04:55 PM, Alex Vong wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> You are lucky not to able to install it! firestarter contained a grave >> bug that will make

Re: firestarter

2015-09-29 Thread Alex Vong
Hi Paul, You are lucky not to able to install it! firestarter contained a grave bug that will make booting impossible <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772715>. Besides, the package was being abandoned by the upstream developers <https://packages.qa.debian.org/f/firesta

Re: Firestarter Events always empty

2013-12-02 Thread Kailash
possible answers From the Debian description at [1]: Firestarter is no longer developed and is missing some critical features such as IPv6 support, so users may be advised to look into more modern alternatives such as gufw. To me it looks like (sadly enough) it hasn't had

Firestarter Events always empty

2013-12-01 Thread Gábor Hársfalvi
Why? Thanks for all possible answers

Re: Firestarter Events always empty

2013-12-01 Thread Andreas Rönnquist
On Sun, 1 Dec 2013 13:31:28 +0100, Gábor Hársfalvihgab...@gmail.com wrote: Why? Thanks for all possible answers From the Debian description at [1]: Firestarter is no longer developed and is missing some critical features such as IPv6 support, so users may be advised to look into more modern

Re: Firestarter Events always empty

2013-12-01 Thread Gábor Hársfalvi
2013/12/1 Andreas Rönnquist mailingli...@gusnan.se On Sun, 1 Dec 2013 13:31:28 +0100, Gábor Hársfalvihgab...@gmail.com wrote: Why? Thanks for all possible answers From the Debian description at [1]: Firestarter is no longer developed and is missing some critical features such as IPv6

firestarter nouvelle demande

2012-05-13 Thread JB2
bonjour, en piochant, j'ai les remarques suivantes: root@alpha30:/etc/init.d# ./firestarter restart [ ok ] Stopping the Firestarter firewall [ ok ] Starting the Firestarter firewall root@alpha30:/etc/init.d# ./firestarter status [warn] Firestarter is running... ... (warning). root@alpha30

Re: firestarter nouvelle demande

2012-05-13 Thread JB2
Le dimanche 13 mai 2012 à 09:15 +0200, JB2 a écrit : bonjour, en piochant, j'ai les remarques suivantes: root@alpha30:/etc/init.d# ./firestarter restart [ ok ] Stopping the Firestarter firewall [ ok ] Starting the Firestarter firewall root@alpha30:/etc/init.d# ./firestarter status

Re: [Wheezy] Firestarter 1.0.3

2012-05-01 Thread JB
Le samedi 28 avril 2012 à 09:34 +0200, JB a écrit : Le vendredi 27 avril 2012 à 18:20 +0200, JB a écrit : Bonsoir, Firestarter 1.0.3, pour cette version, le choix Connexions actives n'affichent plus les valeurs bonne soirée A+ JB1 la version est 1.0.3.10 A+ JB1 bonjour

Re: [Wheezy] Firestarter 1.0.3

2012-05-01 Thread JB
Le mardi 01 mai 2012 à 10:27 +0200, JB a écrit : Le samedi 28 avril 2012 à 09:34 +0200, JB a écrit : Le vendredi 27 avril 2012 à 18:20 +0200, JB a écrit : Bonsoir, Firestarter 1.0.3, pour cette version, le choix Connexions actives n'affichent plus les valeurs bonne soirée

Re: [Wheezy] Firestarter 1.0.3

2012-04-28 Thread JB
Le vendredi 27 avril 2012 à 18:20 +0200, JB a écrit : Bonsoir, Firestarter 1.0.3, pour cette version, le choix Connexions actives n'affichent plus les valeurs bonne soirée A+ JB1 la version est 1.0.3.10 A+ JB1 -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http

[Wheezy] Firestarter 1.0.3

2012-04-27 Thread JB
Bonsoir, Firestarter 1.0.3, pour cette version, le choix Connexions actives n'affichent plus les valeurs bonne soirée A+ JB1 -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe

Re: Problemas para Firestarter sirva DHCP en Squeeze

2011-05-28 Thread Camaleón
El Fri, 27 May 2011 13:03:36 +0200, Julian Daich escribió: Creo que tomé todas las previsiones para que Firestarter escriba en /etc/dhcp3/dhcpd.conf y dhcpd arranque. O sea sudo ln -sf /etc/init.d/isc-dhcp-server /etc/init.d/dhcpd sudo ln -sf /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf /etc/dhcp3/dhcpd.conf

Problemas para Firestarter sirva DHCP en Squeeze

2011-05-27 Thread Julian Daich
Hola, Creo que tomé todas las previsiones para que Firestarter escriba en /etc/dhcp3/dhcpd.conf y dhcpd arranque. O sea sudo ln -sf /etc/init.d/isc-dhcp-server /etc/init.d/dhcpd sudo ln -sf /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf /etc/dhcp3/dhcpd.conf pero parece que hace caso omiso y no escribe en ningún

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-28 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/27/2010 07:23 PM, Rob Owens wrote: I'm inclined to call it a bug in firestarter, but to be sure, test it out with Network Manager instead of wicd. See if you have the same problem. I think you will, which will indicate the problem is with firestarter (or possibly with the way you

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-27 Thread Rob Owens
inet loopback # The primary network interface allow-hotplug eth0 iface eth0 inet static ---8 For grins, I reconfigured /etc/network/interfaces on one of the single network profile systems and, sure enough, firestarter fails

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-26 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
---8 For grins, I reconfigured /etc/network/interfaces on one of the single network profile systems and, sure enough, firestarter fails to launch the firewall. If I switch back to a normal interfaces file, the firewall starts. So, I guess

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-24 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/23/2010 02:38 PM, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: ... I'm guessing I should try to run firestarter in the Pre-connection Script field first, and then fall back to using the Post-connection Script field if Pre-connection fails. Now I just have to decide which of the firestarter scripts it makes

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-24 Thread Rob Owens
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:20:59PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: This is a pretty sophisticated firewall front end, allowing for connection sharing and allowing you to limit service connections to specific IP addresses or IP address ranges, but it's not working reliably for me. And the

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-24 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/24/2010 07:45 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:20:59PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: This is a pretty sophisticated firewall front end, allowing for connection sharing and allowing you to limit service connections to specific IP addresses or IP address ranges, but it's

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Greg Madden
to do with Firestarter being started (or not started) at different run levels during startup? I briefly see something about it scrolling by, but I never get a chance to read it. You can use 'dmesg |grepservice/ ' to see what happens during boot. Hi, Many thanks for the idea. I

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Rob Owens
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:03:59PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: As root I ran /etc/init.d/firestarter start and I got Starting the Firestarter firewall I ran iptables -L and I could see that iptables is properly doing its thing. The rules are in place! So, for some reason

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/23/2010 04:57 AM, Greg Madden wrote: Runlevel 2 is the default runlevel. Look for a link: '/etc/rc2.d/Sxxfirestarter - ../init.d/firestarter' Hi, Greg. Thanks to you and Rob I'm getting a bit of an education. I found /etc/rc2.d/S19firestarter. It does not contain any apparent

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/23/2010 08:16 AM, Rob Owens wrote: What if the network isn't up when firestarter is asked to start? Would it start anyway? Would it fail to start and log an error? Or would it fail silently? I'm not sure of the answers to the above. Maybe you could try shutting down your network

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Rob Owens
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:53:33AM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Starting Network connection manager: wicd. startpar: service(s) returned failure: firestarter ... failed! Running scripts in rc2.d/ took xx seconds. Ah, you're using wicd. For each network connection, click on the scripts

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/23/2010 12:15 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:53:33AM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Starting Network connection manager: wicd. startpar: service(s) returned failure: firestarter ... failed! Running scripts in rc2.d/ took xx seconds. Ah, you're using wicd. For each

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-23 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
-disconnection Script Post-disconnection Script I'm guessing I should try to run firestarter in the Pre-connection Script field first, and then fall back to using the Post-connection Script field if Pre-connection fails. Now I just have to decide which of the firestarter scripts it makes the most

change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
I'm running Firestarter 1.0.3 on Debian testing (both systems involved in this message). A number of months ago I was in a situation where I wanted to establish an SSH connection from my notebook to a desktop system. Because the network on which this desktop system resides is less well

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Rob Owens
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:50:11PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: list's moderator hasn't got back to me. It appears that the rules I want in iptables are not in effect at all until I actually bring up the Firestarter user interface during a given session. Once I log off (restart

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/22/2010 01:56 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:50:11PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: list's moderator hasn't got back to me. It appears that the rules I want in iptables are not in effect at all until I actually bring up the Firestarter user interface during a given

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Rob Owens
actually bring up the Firestarter user interface during a given session. Once I log off (restart not necessary) the rules are apparently reset to the default. You can check this by running (as root): iptables -L If there are no firewall rules active, it will look something like this: Chain

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Greg Madden
On Friday 22 October 2010 11:00:40 Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not started) at different run levels during startup? I briefly see something about it scrolling by, but I never get a chance to read it. You can use 'dmesg |grep

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
in iptables are not in effect at all until I actually bring up the Firestarter user interface during a given session. Once I log off (restart not necessary) the rules are apparently reset to the default. You can check this by running (as root): iptables -L If there are no firewall rules active

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/22/2010 06:00 PM, Greg Madden wrote: On Friday 22 October 2010 11:00:40 Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not started) at different run levels during startup? I briefly see something about it scrolling by, but I never get a chance

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Greg Madden
On Friday 22 October 2010 14:57:15 Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 10/22/2010 06:00 PM, Greg Madden wrote: On Friday 22 October 2010 11:00:40 Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not started) at different run levels during startup? I briefly

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Rob Owens
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:48:34PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: There is an /etc/init.d/firestarter file and an /etc/firestarter/configuration file (that later one being present in its directory with a whole bunch of other files.). After a fresh reboot, with firestarter not running

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/22/2010 08:18 PM, Rob Owens wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:48:34PM -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: There is an /etc/init.d/firestarter file and an /etc/firestarter/configuration file (that later one being present in its directory with a whole bunch of other files.). After a fresh

Re: change in behavior of iptables with respect to firestarter

2010-10-22 Thread Gilbert Sullivan
On 10/22/2010 07:42 PM, Greg Madden wrote: On Friday 22 October 2010 14:57:15 Gilbert Sullivan wrote: On 10/22/2010 06:00 PM, Greg Madden wrote: On Friday 22 October 2010 11:00:40 Gilbert Sullivan wrote: Does this have something to do with Firestarter being started (or not started

Re: Replacement for firestarter?

2009-11-18 Thread green
Todd A. Jacobs wrote at 2009-11-10 14:30 -0600: I'm not really looking for a static firewall builder (e.g. fwbuilder or lokkit), but something that approximates the allow/deny current traffic features of firestarter. I am new to netfilter, etc. and have been doing research recently on firewall

Replacement for firestarter?

2009-11-10 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
I really like using firestarter, as the realtime traffic logs and allow/deny interface are exceedingly useful to me. However, I know that it's been dead upstream for a long time, and I was hoping someone knew of a well-maintained replacement. I'm not really looking for a static firewall builder

Re: Bridging with firestarter and dhcp3-server.[SOLVED]

2009-03-22 Thread Daryl Styrk
Daryl Styrk wrote: I'm attempting to bridge wlan0 with eth0. I've done this successfully in the past with firestarter and dhcp3-server. However I'm running into some issues trying to set this up now. What I have done in the past is set eth0 static, and enabled internet connection sharing

Bridging with firestarter and dhcp3-server.

2009-03-21 Thread Daryl Styrk
I'm attempting to bridge wlan0 with eth0. I've done this successfully in the past with firestarter and dhcp3-server. However I'm running into some issues trying to set this up now. What I have done in the past is set eth0 static, and enabled internet connection sharing in firestarter. Which

Re: iptables/firestarter

2009-01-17 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Fri January 16 2009, Jeff Soules wrote: Personally, I do this: Ensure that you have your firewall rules set up as you wish them. Then, edit /etc/network/interfaces to add the following: # Bring up firewall pre-up iptables-restore /etc/iptables.rules # And save fw state on shutdown

iptables/firestarter

2009-01-16 Thread Paul Cartwright
there is firestarter on my system but it isn't running, and I don't think I ever set it up. All I want is for my web port rule to start every time I boot, but I can't find anywhere in the system where iptables is saved, or where to put this one line rule so it starts every time. wiki.debian.org didn't have

Re: iptables/firestarter

2009-01-16 Thread Umarzuki Mochlis
with my system. I started a small web server, so I could share photos. nginx gallery2 are working just fine, easy to setup and use! The problem is, I just rebooted, and I have to rerun the iptables command to open port 80 for my web server again. I see there is firestarter on my system

Re: iptables/firestarter

2009-01-16 Thread Jeff Soules
gallery2 are working just fine, easy to setup and use! The problem is, I just rebooted, and I have to rerun the iptables command to open port 80 for my web server again. I see there is firestarter on my system but it isn't running, and I don't think I ever set it up. All I want is for my web port

Re: Firestarter dumping blocked events to console

2008-04-10 Thread Mumia W..
On 04/09/2008 10:24 PM, Amit Uttamchandani wrote: Hi there, I installed firestarter on Debian Etch. From my understanding it is pretty much a front end to the ipstarter firewall. Everything has been going great except for one minor annoyance... Every time I connect to the campus network I

Firestarter dumping blocked events to console

2008-04-09 Thread Amit Uttamchandani
Hi there, I installed firestarter on Debian Etch. From my understanding it is pretty much a front end to the ipstarter firewall. Everything has been going great except for one minor annoyance... Every time I connect to the campus network I get bombarded with broadcast SMB packets...fro my

Re: Firestarter dumping blocked events to console

2008-04-09 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 08:24:40PM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote: Hi there, I installed firestarter on Debian Etch. From my understanding it is pretty much a front end to the ipstarter firewall. Everything has been going great except for one minor annoyance... ... Anyways, as soon

Re: Firestarter

2007-12-02 Thread Darko
Paul Cartwright wrote: On Sat December 1 2007, Darko wrote: try going to the start menu-Debian-applications-network-monitoring-firestarter I got your same error when I try it from a konsole, but it works from the menu But where from the menu i can't find it on my kde if i try from

Re: Firestarter

2007-12-02 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sun December 2 2007, Darko wrote: Kmenu - Debian - Applications - Network - Monitoring - FIRESTARTER This part is missing Monitoring - FIRESTARTER someone mentioned installing the application call menu: sudo aptitude install menu then run update-menus if firestarter is installed

Re: Firestarter

2007-12-01 Thread Darko
Patter wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:50:11 +0100, Michael Pobega wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:30:46AM +, Darko wrote: I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to run it under KDE apt-get install --reinstall firestarter You normally

Re: Firestarter

2007-12-01 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sat December 1 2007, Darko wrote: You normally don't need --reinstall, that causes the package to be fully removed before reinstallation.   I did and i cant start it  from default user and after su it says: (firestarter:) gtk warning canot open display try going to the start menu

Re: Firestarter

2007-12-01 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 10:37:15 +, Darko wrote: Patter wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:50:11 +0100, Michael Pobega wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:30:46AM +, Darko wrote: I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to run it under KDE

Re: Firestarter

2007-12-01 Thread Darko
Paul Cartwright wrote: On Sat December 1 2007, Darko wrote: You normally don't need --reinstall, that causes the package to be fully removed before reinstallation. I did and i cant start it from default user and after su it says: (firestarter:) gtk warning canot open display

Re: Firestarter

2007-12-01 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sat December 1 2007, Darko wrote: try going to the start menu-Debian-applications-network-monitoring-firestarter I got your same error when I try it from a konsole, but it works from the menu But where from the menu i can't find it on my kde if i try from /usr/sbin/  then it tells

Re: Firestarter

2007-12-01 Thread David
Darko wrote: snip But where from the menu i can't find it on my kde Install the package 'menu', then after any apt update/upgrade, type 'update-menus' while still at the command line and firestarter is one of the many packages that conform to that requirement. if i try from /usr/sbin

Re: Firestarter

2007-11-30 Thread Patter
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:50:11 +0100, Michael Pobega wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:30:46AM +, Darko wrote: I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to run it under KDE apt-get install --reinstall firestarter You normally don't need --reinstall

Re: Firestarter

2007-11-30 Thread Michael Pobega
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:30:46AM +, Darko wrote: I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to run it under KDE apt-get install --reinstall firestarter - -- If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating

Firestarter

2007-11-30 Thread Darko
I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to run it under KDE -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Firestarter

2007-11-30 Thread David
Darko wrote: I deinstaled gnome and now I can't start firestarter is exsist a way to run it under KDE Just reinstall it. It should drag in all the libs necessary to run it without having to run a full Gnome install. I don't have a full Gnome desktop, I simply don't need it. I just install

Incompatibilidade Kernel 2.6.21.5 e Firestarter

2007-06-19 Thread Marcos Terra
Bom dia ! Alguém atualizou o kernel do debian para uma versão 2.6.20 ou acima? bom estou rodando o kernel citado acima, e o firestarter não está rodando corretamente, exibe essa mengagem de erro arindo pelo terminal: Error reading /proc/net/ip_conntrack: No such file or directory Error

Re: Incompatibilidade Kernel 2.6.21.5 e Firestarter

2007-06-19 Thread Renato S. Yamane
Marcos Terra escreveu: Alguém atualizou o kernel do debian para uma versão 2.6.20 ou acima? Estou usando o 2.6.21.1 bom estou rodando o kernel citado acima, e o firestarter não está rodando corretamente, exibe essa mengagem de erro arindo pelo terminal: Error reading /proc/net/ip_conntrack

Re: Lo que no logro entender sobre Firestarter.

2007-06-02 Thread R.R.R.
Tal que el Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:12:58 +0200 Christophe T [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuvo a bien escribir: En cualquiera de los dos casos. ¿Si no hubiera instalado nunca firestarter esas conexiones bloqueadas se bloquearían de todas formas con iptables o significa que gracias a firestarter que no me

Re: Lo que no logro entender sobre Firestarter.

2007-06-02 Thread Abejo
El Sáb 02 Jun 2007, R.R.R. escribió: Tal que el Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:12:58 +0200 Christophe T [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuvo a bien escribir: En cualquiera de los dos casos. ¿Si no hubiera instalado nunca firestarter esas conexiones bloqueadas se bloquearían de todas formas con iptables o

Re: Lo que no logro entender sobre Firestarter.

2007-06-02 Thread Christophe T
2007/6/2, Abejo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: El Sáb 02 Jun 2007, R.R.R. escribió: Tal que el Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:12:58 +0200 Christophe T [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuvo a bien escribir: En cualquiera de los dos casos. ¿Si no hubiera instalado nunca firestarter esas conexiones bloqueadas se bloquearían

Re: Lo que no logro entender sobre Firestarter.

2007-06-02 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Sábado, 2 de Junio de 2007, R.R.R. escribió: Por tanto, a mi entender, si no tuviera Firestarter instalado, sólo con tener iptables no se filtrarían esos paquetes que van al puerto 445 ni cualquier otro, a no ser que se lo especificara expresamente. Pero corríjanme si estoy equivocado, que

Lo que no logro entender sobre Firestarter.

2007-06-01 Thread Polo Oyarzún
Estimados miembros de la lista. He buscado por varios días aclarar lo que no entiendo de firestarter en google y no me queda claro. Especifico. Soy un simple y sencillo novato en Debian. Lo uso como entorno de escritorio nada más Entiendase chatear, navergar hacerme el lindo, prenderlo y apagarlo

Re: Lo que no logro entender sobre Firestarter.

2007-06-01 Thread Christophe T
Saludos, 2007/6/1, Polo Oyarzún correo512gmail.com: Estimados miembros de la lista. He buscado por varios días aclarar lo que no entiendo de firestarter en google y no me queda claro. Especifico. Soy un simple y sencillo novato en Debian. Lo uso como entorno de escritorio nada más En casa tengo

Re: Lo que no logro entender sobre Firestarter.

2007-06-01 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Viernes, 1 de Junio de 2007, Polo Oyarzún escribió: Estimados miembros de la lista. Por favor, no le des a Responder sobre otro correo de otro hilo para generar una pregunta nueva. A quienes usamos clientes de correo decentes nos provoca que tu correo cuelgue de un hilo con el que nada

Re: Firestarter Failed

2007-05-23 Thread Christophe T
2007/5/23, Polo Oyarzún correo512gmail.com: Buenas. Tengo una duda con Firestarter que me atormenta un poco. Cuando inicio el sistema sale esto done lo otro done etc. Y en una parte sale firestarter failed. ¿Qué ocurre?. Gracias. Probablemente pasa que intenta lanzar el cortafuego y no ha

Firestarter Failed

2007-05-22 Thread Polo Oyarzún
Buenas. Tengo una duda con Firestarter que me atormenta un poco. Cuando inicio el sistema sale esto done lo otro done etc. Y en una parte sale firestarter failed. ¿Qué ocurre?. Gracias. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Firestarter

2007-05-08 Thread Carlos Augusto Beltrame
Ola pessoal, eu instalei o Firestarter no meu PC e queria que ele iniciasse junto com o computador, portanto, quando inicalizasse o grafico, iniciasse o Firestarter tambem, pra qualquer usuario da maquina. Obrigado *= .''`. Yours Trully : :' : Carlos

Re: Firestarter

2007-05-08 Thread fpandufo
Em Ter, 2007-05-08 às 09:42 -0700, Carlos Augusto Beltrame escreveu: Ola pessoal, eu instalei o Firestarter no meu PC e queria que ele iniciasse junto com o computador, portanto, quando inicalizasse o grafico, iniciasse o Firestarter tambem, pra qualquer usuario da maquina. Obrigado rcconf

Re: Firestarter

2007-05-08 Thread Zandre Bran
On 5/8/07, Carlos Augusto Beltrame [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ola pessoal, eu instalei o Firestarter no meu PC e queria que ele iniciasse junto com o computador, portanto, quando inicalizasse o grafico, iniciasse o Firestarter tambem, pra qualquer usuario da maquina. Obrigado Carlos tem tb

Re: Logs en firestarter

2007-05-01 Thread Abejo
;\ *.=debug;*.=warn/dev/tty10 *.=info /dev/tty11 *.=notice /dev/tty12 el tema es que al habilitar el firestarter me empezaron a aparecer todos los logs de este programa en la consola que tenga abierta (tty1, tty2, etc) buscando por

Re: Logs en firestarter

2007-04-30 Thread MarioDebian
/dev/tty11 *.=notice /dev/tty12 el tema es que al habilitar el firestarter me empezaron a aparecer todos los logs de este programa en la consola que tenga abierta (tty1, tty2, etc) buscando por internet vi que habia que cambiar el nivel de los logs dentro del /etc/init.d

Re: Logs en firestarter

2007-04-30 Thread ZorroPlateado
/dev/tty11 *.=notice /dev/tty12 el tema es que al habilitar el firestarter me empezaron a aparecer todos los logs de este programa en la consola que tenga abierta (tty1, tty2, etc) buscando por internet vi que habia que cambiar el nivel de los logs dentro del /etc/init.d

Logs en firestarter

2007-04-29 Thread Abejo
/dev/tty12 el tema es que al habilitar el firestarter me empezaron a aparecer todos los logs de este programa en la consola que tenga abierta (tty1, tty2, etc) buscando por internet vi que habia que cambiar el nivel de los logs dentro del /etc/init.d/klogd reemplazando KLOGD= por KLOGD=-c 4 la

Firestarter

2007-03-21 Thread Saint
Depois q instalei o firestarter venho recebendo estas mensagens no /var/log/messeges: Mar 22 03:27:18 saint kernel: Inbound IN=ppp0 OUT= MAC= SRC=203.142.167.191 DST=201.1.35.79 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=102 ID=256 PROTO=TCP SPT=39277 DPT=5900 WINDOW=55808 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Mar 22 03:28:01

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-04 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 02:03:51 +0100 Andreas Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use ssh with X11 forwarding to manage the firewall. With firestarter? How? [snip X11 forwarding stuff] If *that* isn't shooting a fly with a canon, than I don't know what is. With shorewall I just open

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-04 Thread Andreas Duffner
Andrei Popescu wrote: I use ssh with X11 forwarding to manage the firewall. With firestarter? How? [snip X11 forwarding stuff] If *that* isn't shooting a fly with a canon, than I don't know what is. Mmm. So why do you use shorewall at all ? It is like using a pistol against an unarmed

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-04 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:09:10 +0100 Andreas Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrei Popescu wrote: I use ssh with X11 forwarding to manage the firewall. With firestarter? How? [snip X11 forwarding stuff] If *that* isn't shooting a fly with a canon, than I don't know what

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-04 Thread Andreas Duffner
Andrei Popescu wrote: Andrei Popescu wrote: I use ssh with X11 forwarding to manage the firewall. With firestarter? How? [snip X11 forwarding stuff] If *that* isn't shooting a fly with a canon, than I don't know what is. [snip rant against console users] You *really* do not read what

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-04 Thread hendrik
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:19:02PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: 70MB is *huge* amount of data to install *only* to have a gui. IMHO firestarter is only useful if you already have X installed, though this is a bad idea on a server. You could run X on another system. People tend to forget

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-04 Thread Andreas Duffner
(no, not the ones with the small grey things from ufos), some stuff from X, too. That is the reason why I talk about ca. 70 MB. FireStarter is small. But to start the gui, the system wants some other files. At least, I thought so until now. When I say apt-get install firestarter it will get firestart + needed

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-04 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:51:48AM +0100, Andreas Duffner wrote: Do I understand you right, that I do not have to download these X-files, if I intend to export the display to another computer ? That would be really nice. You need the xbase-clients package at a very minimum. You ssh in

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-04 Thread John Hasler
Andreas writes: Do I understand you right, that I do not have to download these X-files, if I intend to export the display to another computer ? You need some libraries but no X-server. Firestarter 1.0.3-1.3 dependencies: libart-2.0-2 (= 2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (= 1.12.2), libaudiofile0

separating x client from x server (was: Firestarter VS Shorewall)

2007-03-04 Thread hendrik
about ca. 70 MB. FireStarter is small. But to start the gui, the system wants some other files. At least, I thought so until now. When I say apt-get install firestarter it will get firestart + needed files. And if I have no X related files there, it starts to download lots of them. Do I

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-04 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:50:17 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 11:19:02PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: 70MB is *huge* amount of data to install *only* to have a gui. IMHO firestarter is only useful if you already have X installed, though this is a bad idea

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-03 Thread David Hart
On Thu 2007-03-01 16:05:32 -0500 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:45:41PM +0100, Franck Joncourt wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:56:41AM -0800, Jordi wrote: John, that seems to complicated for me, but seems good as it is a hardware firewall. Roverto, seems you

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-03 Thread Franck Joncourt
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:08:36AM +, David Hart wrote: On Thu 2007-03-01 16:05:32 -0500 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:45:41PM +0100, Franck Joncourt wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:56:41AM -0800, Jordi wrote: John, that seems to complicated for me, but

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-03 Thread Jordi
Thanks for the links I asked in the Ubuntu forum too and they say me that it may be unnecessary to combine hardware firewall and software firewall (iptables or any other that uses it). But they said I can do, if I am paranoid. And as you said, the correct place to stop an intruder is BEFORE they

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-03 Thread Andreas Duffner
Jordi wrote: I saw two good firewalls: - Firestarter wich is easy - Shorewall wich seems versatile Wich is best for a single server pc? Does the complexity of shorewall worth the effort or is firestarter as good as shorewall? I can only tell about firestarter. Perhaps it helps a bit. First

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-03 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:08:36AM +, David Hart wrote: If you need to manage a half-dozen zones the chances are that you'll be doing packet filtering on specialized hardware so shorewall will be of no use. Well, chances are you don't know what you are talking about. Please go look at

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-03 Thread John Hasler
Jordi writes: To have a good hardware firewall buy a good router-switch or a specific hardware device. To have a good hardware firewall buy a cheap used pc, install Linux on it, and configure it as a router and firewall. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-03 Thread Peter Teunissen
On 3-mrt-2007, at 14:52, John Hasler wrote: Jordi writes: To have a good hardware firewall buy a good router-switch or a specific hardware device. To have a good hardware firewall buy a cheap used pc, install Linux on it, and configure it as a router and firewall. -- Or, if you like

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-03 Thread John Hasler
Peter writes: Or, if you like ease of use (great web based GUI)... I do not want a Web server running on my router. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-03 Thread Jordi
Thanks Andreas. I agree with most that you said, as I am very pragmatic on my needs. I think I will buy the router I said, wich looks a very strong router from security point of view, and plus install firestarter and some other utility if I need. And things sometimes are not so complex

Re: Firestarter VS Shorewall

2007-03-03 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:25:12 +0100 Andreas Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I just want a working firewall. And firestarter does this job. I do not know about complex setups with multiple servers. I am just using one server, client etc at the time. The firewall shall protect one computer

  1   2   3   4   >