On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:03:50PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:49:41PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
It certainly can do what you want, if you leave it running and use it as a
shell and not as a single-command download tool. lftp can carry as
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:02:34PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:03:50PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:49:41PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
It certainly can do what you want, if you leave it running and use it as a
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
What we need is a multi-protocol proxy server that does proper
throttling of download requests.
Squid delay pools? Will work for http and ftp.
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Mike Bird wrote:
packets aren't lost. This doesn't work for UDP and ICMP and works poorly
for varying loads.
Correct. But it works wonderfully for long-lived TCP connections, and if
you are using ftp/http (and not, say, bittorrent) to get your ISOs, it will
help you.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:08:06AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
What we need is a multi-protocol proxy server that does proper
throttling of download requests.
Squid delay pools? Will work for http and ftp.
But not rsync, which
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
But not rsync, which I use whenever I can for large downloads due to
errors creeping in for some reason over my noisy phone line and freqent
line drops (and susequent redials by pppd).
Why do you allow for damaged packets at all?
I used analog
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:03:52PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
But not rsync, which I use whenever I can for large downloads due to
errors creeping in for some reason over my noisy phone line and freqent
line drops (and susequent
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
I used analog async ITU-T V42 modems for a *long* time (fortunately, I was
able to move away before V9x hit the market). You really want an error-free
channel without compression for regular Internet over PPP domestic use, and
any modem
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:41:56PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Try lftp. I know of no better ftp client. But it is command-line, which is
just as well: the transfer engine is well cared for, and not a secondary
thing to the GUI.
I've got lftp installed but haven't tried it.
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:41:56PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Try lftp. I know of no better ftp client. But it is command-line, which is
just as well: the transfer engine is well cared for, and not a secondary
thing to the
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:33:14PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:41:56PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Try lftp. I know of no better ftp client. But it is command-line, which
is
just
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
Except that for a download that I have to restart 5 or 10 times, its
easier to put the url in a file and use wget, or for rsync I put the
whole command line in a file, pound-hack it, chmod +x and away it goes.
If lftp had a download queue that
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:49:41PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
It certainly can do what you want, if you leave it running and use it as a
shell and not as a single-command download tool. lftp can carry as many
transfers in parallel as needed, to as many sites as needed, and
I'm on slow dialup. Downloads of iso's take days. Yet, I still want to
be able to browse the internet.
I would like to set up something like trickle that will run something
but limit its bandwidth so that it lower's its priority.
For example, wget and rsync allow one to limit the bandwidth to a
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 06:14:46PM -, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jul 29, 11:10 am, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on slow dialup. Downloads of iso's take days. Yet, I still want to
be able to browse the internet.
I would like to set up something like trickle that will
On 7/29/07, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on slow dialup. Downloads of iso's take days. Yet, I still want to
be able to browse the internet.
I would like to set up something like trickle that will run something
but limit its bandwidth so that it lower's its priority.
I
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:28:17 -0400
Andrew J. Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/29/07, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm on slow dialup. Downloads of iso's take days. Yet, I still want to
be able to browse the internet.
I would like to set up something like trickle that
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:32:44PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
I have issues similar to Doug's, and I have also wondered whether
kernel based traffic shaping is what I need. Since we both use
shorewall, which has an interface to the kernel's shaping capabilities,
I suppose we ought to read
On Sunday 29 July 2007 13:11, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:32:44PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
I have issues similar to Doug's, and I have also wondered whether
kernel based traffic shaping is what I need. Since we both use
shorewall, which has an interface to the
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:54:36PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
Traffic shaping usually applies to output. Policing[0] usually applies
to input. Since we often can't shape on the router transmitting data to
us, in such cases we instead have to police on the receiving end and rely
on the
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:32:44PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
I have issues similar to Doug's, and I have also wondered whether
kernel based traffic shaping is what I need. Since we both use
shorewall, which has an interface to the kernel's shaping capabilities,
I suppose we ought to read
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:11:43 -0400
Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:32:44PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
I have issues similar to Doug's, and I have also wondered whether
kernel based traffic shaping is what I need. Since we both use
shorewall, which has
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 10:42:29PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:11:43 -0400
Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 03:32:44PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
I have issues similar to Doug's, and I have also wondered whether
kernel based traffic
23 matches
Mail list logo
