Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On Wed 10 Apr 2024 at 14:36:20 (-0400), Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 7:00 AM Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > > On one machine, I have > > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2023-10-07 13:43:24 > > /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> > >

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On Thu 11 Apr 2024 at 19:28:48 (+0200), Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2024-04-10 23:47:36 -0500, David Wright wrote: > > On Thu 11 Apr 2024 at 03:36:59 (+0200), Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > On 2024-04-10 09:52:51 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > > > > I'd hazard it's a consequence of usrmerge being the

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On 2024-04-10 23:47:36 -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 11 Apr 2024 at 03:36:59 (+0200), Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2024-04-10 09:52:51 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > > > I'd hazard it's a consequence of usrmerge being the "default state" in > > > one installation and not the other. > > > >

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On Thu 11 Apr 2024 at 03:36:59 (+0200), Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2024-04-10 09:52:51 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > > I'd hazard it's a consequence of usrmerge being the "default state" in > > one installation and not the other. > > Both machines have always been usr-merged (i.e. from the Debian

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On 2024-04-10 09:52:51 -0400, Dan Purgert wrote: > I'd hazard it's a consequence of usrmerge being the "default state" in > one installation and not the other. Both machines have always been usr-merged (i.e. from the Debian installation). -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web:

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 7:00 AM Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On one machine, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2023-10-07 13:43:24 > /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> > /lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket > > and on another one, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On Wed 10 Apr 2024 at 12:33:21 (+0200), Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On one machine, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2023-10-07 13:43:24 > /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> > /lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket > > and on another one, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root

Re: inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

On Apr 10, 2024, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Hi, > > On one machine, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2023-10-07 13:43:24 > /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> > /lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket > > and on another one, I have > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39

inconsistency in the symlinks under /etc/systemd

Hi, On one machine, I have lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2023-10-07 13:43:24 /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/dm-event.socket -> /lib/systemd/system/dm-event.socket and on another one, I have lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2024-01-05 16:54:09