installé.
texlive-binaries est aussi simplement suggéré, et si texlive n'est pas
installé, lui aussi dépend de 49 autres paquets.
etc
etc
Donc une centaine de paquets, ce n'est pas étonnant.
De plus :
Le paquet lpr sera enlevé, mais un fichier lpr (dans /usr/bin/ il me
semble) sera installé en
paquets.
etc
etc
Donc une centaine de paquets, ce n'est pas étonnant.
De plus :
Le paquet lpr sera enlevé, mais un fichier lpr (dans /usr/bin/ il me
semble) sera installé en remplacement (voir
https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents=lpr=exactfilename=bookworm=amd64)
si la commande
Bonjour,
sur une debian 10 sous xfce, je voudrais installer okular pour tester.
A l'install, synaptic veut enlever lpr et mettre cups-bsd à la place,
plus une centaine de fichiers.
Y a t'il un inconvénient pour lpr et cups-bsd?
Le nombre de fichiers supplémentaires me semble élevé pour une
On 17/02/2023 00:46, Greg Marks wrote:
When trying to print a file that contains emojis with the lpr
command, not only do the emojis not print, nothing following the first
non-printing emoji prints. (This makes it a hassle to print certain
e-mails piped to lpr using mutt.) As a small example
On 2/16/23 22:46, Greg Marks wrote:
When trying to print a file that contains emojis with the lpr
command, not only do the emojis not print, nothing following the first
non-printing emoji prints. (This makes it a hassle to print certain
e-mails piped to lpr using mutt.) As a small example
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:46:40 -0600
Greg Marks wrote:
> Does anyone have a good way of printing text that contains emojis?
I took your test.txt file, html-ized it, and looked at it in a browser.
I then "printed" it to a PDF file. Both showed the emoji. I didn't
actually print it, but that
When trying to print a file that contains emojis with the lpr
command, not only do the emojis not print, nothing following the first
non-printing emoji prints. (This makes it a hassle to print certain
e-mails piped to lpr using mutt.) As a small example, after entering
the command:
echo -e
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Hm. Looking into the Postscript files, tst.ps has one page and
tst2.ps has two. So it seems to work as intended.
Why do you expect tst2.ps to only yield one page?
hi Tomas,
you are perfectly right: I used the wrong tool (xv) to display the file.
I
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:41:36PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> I have 2 postscript files, tst.ps and tst2.ps. (cf attached files)
> with: lpr -P pdf tst.ps, I get a 1 page tst.pdf
> with: lpr -P pdf tst2.ps, I get a 2 pages tst2.pdf
> Can anybody help to solve th
hi,
I have 2 postscript files, tst.ps and tst2.ps. (cf attached files)
with: lpr -P pdf tst.ps, I get a 1 page tst.pdf
with: lpr -P pdf tst2.ps, I get a 2 pages tst2.pdf
Can anybody help to solve this mystery?
best regards,
--
Pierre Frenkiel
tst.ps
Description: PostScript document
tst2.ps
On 10/25/2015 05:29 AM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>> The packages cups-bsd, lpr, and lprng all have lpr. Try installing them
>> and removing them in turn, and see which works.
> Installation of cups-bsd did the trick.
>
> BTW, I tried installing lpr before and it did not hel
On Sun 25 Oct 2015 at 04:29:14 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> > The packages cups-bsd, lpr, and lprng all have lpr. Try installing them
> > and removing them in turn, and see which works.
>
> Installation of cups-bsd did the trick.
So it should. For all practical purpo
fine.
>
> However, when I try to print from it on amd64 install the error:"/bin/sh:
> 1: lpr: not found" is thrown on me.
>
> I've tested printing with 'lp' from CLI and it works equally well on both
> installations. Checked out and 'lpr' is not installed on neithe
installs with one exception described below.
When I run the same application in Wine on i386 install, I can print from
the app just fine.
However, when I try to print from it on amd64 install the error:"/bin/sh:
1: lpr: not found" is thrown on me.
I've tested printing with 'lp
> The packages cups-bsd, lpr, and lprng all have lpr. Try installing them
> and removing them in turn, and see which works.
Installation of cups-bsd did the trick.
BTW, I tried installing lpr before and it did not help.
This is weird, since I've looked into my i386 installation and n
Emanuel Berg embe8...@student.uu.se writes:
This zsh works most of the time: then print the PDF.
I say most of the time as sometimes the image gets
cut in the edges - I don't know why ...
This hack still hasn't failed me. First, I do a PDF
that is A5 (i.e., smaller than A4). Then I print it
This zsh works most of the time: then print the PDF.
I say most of the time as sometimes the image gets
cut in the edges - I don't know why.
jpeg2pdf () {
local pic=$1
local pdf=${pic:r}.pdf
gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite \
-sPAPERSIZE=a4 \
-o $pdf
I wrote this zsh wrapper to `convert' to do it.
With the 72 PPI resolution, the image get smaller!
With the 200 PPI resolution, the image gets bigger,
and it looks good when viewed with feh, but when
I print (with lpr) the increased-size image gets split
up in two parts on the paper with a black
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I sometimes use lpr in a pipeline getting postscript from groff. My
printer (HP CP2025dn) has a duplexer and I'd like to use it. I could
look up the Postscript
I sometimes use lpr in a pipeline getting postscript from groff. My
printer (HP CP2025dn) has a duplexer and I'd like to use it. I could look
up the Postscript for that, but I'm wondering if there's a way to force
either of groff or lpr to do it for me.
--
Kevin O'Gorman
#define QUESTION ((bb
On Thu 11 Dec 2014 at 11:14:23 -0800, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I sometimes use lpr in a pipeline getting postscript from groff. My
printer (HP CP2025dn) has a duplexer and I'd like to use it. I could look
up the Postscript for that, but I'm wondering if there's a way to force
either of groff
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I sometimes use lpr in a pipeline getting postscript from groff. My
printer (HP CP2025dn) has a duplexer and I'd like to use it. I could
look up the Postscript for that, but I'm wondering if there's a way to
force either of groff or lpr to do
driver and sending a job myself through the cups-lpr service, I get
the desired output.
For what it's worth, the control characters in this particular case are:
^[E^[l0S^[l5H^[l1O^[(8U^[(s0P^[(s15H^[(s8.5V^[(s0S^[(s0B^[(s0T^[l5.2727C^[k8H^[l7E^[a14L^[l1L^[s0C^[a0R
Would filtering the incoming
driver and sending a job myself through the cups-lpr service, I
get
the desired output.
For what it's worth, the control characters in this particular case are:
^[E^[l0S^[l5H^[l1O^[(8U^[(s0P^[(s15H^[(s8.5V^[(s0S^[(s0B^[(s0T^[l5.2727C^[k8H^[l7E^[a14L^[l1L^[s0C^[a0R
Would filtering
Hello
I am struggling with an issue - hopefully someone has some experience they
can share.
I am trying to implement a PDF printer for a legacy mainframe process that
prints reports to an LPR remote target. I have no access to the job
provider, I am on the target end with a setup as below:
cups
external drivers which is always a bad signal
(ufff.. how bad, it's a GDI printer).
The Brother website has a linux LPR driver in .deb format that
installed and worked easily under Lenny using the gnome Printer install
menu. Under Squeeze, the gnome Printer install menu seems to be
looking
Am trying to get a Brother HL-2240 printer working with a new debian
Squeeze installation. The Brother website has a linux LPR driver in
.deb format that installed and worked easily under Lenny using the gnome
Printer install menu. Under Squeeze, the gnome Printer install menu
seems
On 24/08/12 10:39 PM, Rick Lutowski wrote:
Am trying to get a Brother HL-2240 printer working with a new debian
Squeeze installation. The Brother website has a linux LPR driver in
.deb format that installed and worked easily under Lenny using the
gnome Printer install menu. Under Squeeze
estou tentando configurar uma impressora brother 9045 no debian via lpr ja
configurei o printcap mas nao consigo imprimir com ela diss que a impressora
nao existe como eu faço para reiniciar o lpr daemon no debian? quando digito
/etc/init.d/lpr restart diss que nao existe
On 03 Feb 2012, Russell L. Harris wrote:
There is a bit more to this matter than the package lpr.
About a decade ago, the package lprng (ng meaning next generation)
fixed most of the problems of the package lpr. Most importantly, the
author of lprng carefully documented the procedure
* Anthony Campbell a...@acampbell.org.uk [120203 11:21]:
Interesting: I didn't know about the purchase by Apple. I always
preferred lprng to cups but for some reason one of my laptops no longer
gave me /dev/lp0 so I was forced to use cups on that machine. I had some
problems with cups last
On 2012-02-02 11:43:24 +0800, lina wrote:
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
There are several ones:
$ apt-file -x search 'bin/lpr$'
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
cups-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/lpr
gnuspool: /usr/bin/lpr
lpr: /usr/bin/lpr
lprng: /usr/bin/lpr
Not sure what's
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-02-02 11:43:24 +0800, lina wrote:
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
There are several ones:
$ apt-file -x search 'bin/lpr$'
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
cups-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/lpr
gnuspool: /usr/bin/lpr
lpr: /usr/bin/lpr
lprng
On Friday 03,February,2012 06:49 PM, Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 03 Feb 2012, Russell L. Harris wrote:
There is a bit more to this matter than the package lpr.
About a decade ago, the package lprng (ng meaning next generation)
fixed most of the problems of the package lpr. Most importantly
On Friday 03,February,2012 09:01 PM, lina wrote:
On Friday 03,February,2012 06:49 PM, Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 03 Feb 2012, Russell L. Harris wrote:
There is a bit more to this matter than the package lpr.
About a decade ago, the package lprng (ng meaning next generation)
fixed most
On 03/02/12 12:48, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-02-02 11:43:24 +0800, lina wrote:
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
There are several ones:
$ apt-file -x search 'bin/lpr$'
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
cups-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/lpr
gnuspool: /usr
Dom wrote:
On 03/02/12 12:48, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-02-02 11:43:24 +0800, lina wrote:
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
There are several ones:
$ apt-file -x search 'bin/lpr$'
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
cups-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/lpr
have a derived problem, after installing lpr,
$ lpr ProbSet_2.pdf
lpr: lp: unknown printer
$ lpstat
HP-LaserJet-P4015-225 lina156672 Thursday
02,February,2012 11:35:38 AM SGT
lp ProbSet_2.pdf
request id is HP-LaserJet-P4015-226 (1 file(s))
I don't know what's going on.
thanks
lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com writes:
well, I have a derived problem, after installing lpr,
$ lpr ProbSet_2.pdf
lpr: lp: unknown printer
$ lpstat
HP-LaserJet-P4015-225 lina156672 Thursday
02,February,2012 11:35:38 AM SGT
lp ProbSet_2.pdf
request id is HP-LaserJet-P4015
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:53 AM, lee l...@songoku.yagibdah.de wrote:
lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com writes:
well, I have a derived problem, after installing lpr,
$ lpr ProbSet_2.pdf
lpr: lp: unknown printer
$ lpstat
HP-LaserJet-P4015-225 lina 156672 Thursday
02,February,2012
* Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com [120203 05:40]:
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
For whatever reason the folks around here seem to prefer lprng over
lpr. And of course the lpr command is also provided by cups-bsd /
cups. So there seem to be three flavors available.
There is a bit more to this matter than
Hi,
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAG9cJmm3FajWtM=qm1agsvgvya7tpsjrx30-_ztdhseuot
On 2/1/2012 9:43 PM, lina wrote:
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
Surprisingly... lpr
$ aptitude show lpr
Package: lpr
State: not installed
Version: 1:2008.05.17
Priority: optional
Section: net
Maintainer: Adam Majer ad...@zombino.com
Uncompressed Size: 410 k
Depends: libc6
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 2/1/2012 9:43 PM, lina wrote:
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
Surprisingly... lpr
aha ... thanks,
$ aptitude show lpr
Package: lpr
State: not installed
Version: 1:2008.05.17
Priority
lpr,
$ lpr ProbSet_2.pdf
lpr: lp: unknown printer
$ lpstat
HP-LaserJet-P4015-225 lina156672 Thursday
02,February,2012 11:35:38 AM SGT
lp ProbSet_2.pdf
request id is HP-LaserJet-P4015-226 (1 file(s))
I don't know what's going on.
thanks,
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:27 PM, kei
Hi,
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
Thanks,
lpr is the name of the package.
If a progam is installed, you can use:
dpkg -S program_name
to find the package name. If it is not installed you can use:
apt-cache search program_name
Depending on your setup you may want
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
lina wrote:
which package contains the lpr command for printing.
Surprisingly... lpr
Provided by: cups-bsd, lprng
Description: BSD lpr/lpd line printer spooling system
For whatever reason the folks around here seem to prefer lprng over
lpr. And of course the lpr
do
PDF
- drugi serwer (yyy), na którym nie mogę zainstalować CUPS (stare
biblioteki C dla VMWare) ale zainstalowałem LPR
Chciałbym, jeżeli to możliwe:
- skonfigurować drukowanie na yyy na LPR tak by wydruki były
przekazywane na PDF na xxx
lub
- skonfigurować drukowanie na yyy na LPR tak
Cześć.
Mam taką sytuację:
- 1 serwer (xxx), na którym w CUPS mam skonfigurowaną drukarkę drukującą do PDF
- drugi serwer (yyy), na którym nie mogę zainstalować CUPS (stare
biblioteki C dla VMWare) ale zainstalowałem LPR
Chciałbym, jeżeli to możliwe:
- skonfigurować drukowanie na yyy na LPR tak
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 02:51:30PM BST, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Cześć.
Mam taką sytuację:
- 1 serwer (xxx), na którym w CUPS mam skonfigurowaną drukarkę drukującą do
PDF
- drugi serwer (yyy), na którym nie mogę zainstalować CUPS (stare
biblioteki C dla VMWare) ale zainstalowałem LPR
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:37:39 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
I know that lpr is BSD and lp is SYSV, so lpr is needed for
compatibility, but when comparing the man pages, lpr seems to only be a
half-the-features lp.
It seems to have less options, yes.
But both (lp and lpr) are included in CUPS so I
On 2010-04-04 05:57, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:37:39 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
I know that lpr is BSD and lp is SYSV, so lpr is needed for
compatibility, but when comparing the man pages, lpr seems to only be a
half-the-features lp.
It seems to have less options, yes.
But both
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:13:20 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-04-04 05:57, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
we can use whichever best suits our needs.
Right.
But, absent old or cross-platform scripts which need to run on both
Linux and BSD, what *benefit* does lpr have over lp?
In todays
lpr have over lp?
In todays systems I fail to see a clear difference on both :-?
This article may help:
***
8.17 Printing Protocols (lpr and lp)
http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking/firewall/ch08_17.htm
The System V lp printing system doesn't really have a remote printing
component. When
I know that lpr is BSD and lp is SYSV, so lpr is needed for
compatibility, but when comparing the man pages, lpr seems to only
be a half-the-features lp.
--
History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak
or the timid. Dwight Eisenhower
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
empresa o problema é
que quando apartir do windows solicito uma impressao na impressora
do servidor essa impressao ocorre sem problemas, porem quando acesso
o programa e solicito a impressao apresenta a msg.
LPR: cannot connect to X server
Alguém tem alguma ideia ?
Pessoal,
quando mando imprimir no iceweasel aparece a opção: Imprimir para LPR e na
linha de comando aparece lpr. Eu gosto de usar o kprinter, até quando ele
existir. Como eu faço para que esta opção de linha de comando, ou seja, trocar
lpr por kprinter, fique permanente? Já troquei todas
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:52:26PM -0400, John wrote:
Following Ben Finney's finding under Bug #530027, I downgraded
everything cups to 1.3.8-1lenny5. That in turn required a frightening
I'm pretty sure it's a regression or incompatibility. So, I've gone
ahead and filed a bug against the
the upgrade to Lenny. The utilities are
provided by:
cups-client: /usr/bin/lp
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpq
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
and I have the following packages installed:
cups-client/stable uptodate 1.3.8-1+lenny6
cups-bsd/stable uptodate 1.3.8-1+lenny6
None of which really
On (22/06/09 19:39), Florian Kulzer wrote:
| On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:24:09 -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
| On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 05:48:15PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
| None of which really addresses the question of what the error message
| means.
|
| I decide which questions I consider
/bin/lp
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpq
cups-bsd: /usr/bin/lpr
and I have the following packages installed:
cups-client/stable uptodate 1.3.8-1+lenny6
cups-bsd/stable uptodate 1.3.8-1+lenny6
None of which really addresses the question of what the error message
means. If I can see the printer
I'm not getting any logs from the local cups-client, but the remote
server is logging the following when I attempt to print (see previous
post):
192.168.101.103 - - [21/Jun/2009:02:20:49 -0700] POST / HTTP/1.1 400 0 - -
192.168.101.103 - - [21/Jun/2009:02:20:49 -0700] POST /printers/hpoj
- no default destination available.
$ echo foo | lpr
lpr: Error - scheduler not responding!
And the following acts as a no-op:
$ echo foo | lp
This was working as-is a few upgrades ago.
What kind of upgrades? (In other words: Please tell us which version of
Debian you
I have cupsd configured on a remote host to publish its printers, and
the web interface on http://localhost:631 on the local server sees the
remote printers and a defined default printer. However:
$ lpq
lpq: error - no default destination available.
$ echo foo | lpr
lpr
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:48:51AM +0200, beatrice wrote:
Please keep in mind that English is not my first language and if I
forgot any relevant information, I'd be happy to provide it.
Thanks,
beatrice.
===from my aptitude logs.
NOTE: my logs are localized in Italian. AGGIORNATO
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, at 19:42 +1200, You wrote:
[AGGIORNATO] liborbit2 1:2.14.16-0.1 - 1:2.14.17-0.1
[AGGIORNATO] lxdvdrip 1.74-0.0 - 1.74-0.1
===
To get your output in English, put LANG=C before the command:
beatrice wrote:
I have a Brother HL2040 printer that worked perfectly well on
my Debian testing with the .deb driver package Brother
provides. I don't have CUPS installed, I use lpr. My printer
stopped working without me changing any system configuration
other than my usual package updating
Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
beatrice wrote:
I have a Brother HL2040 printer that worked perfectly well on
my Debian testing with the .deb driver package Brother
provides. I don't have CUPS installed, I use lpr. My printer
stopped working without me changing any system configuration
other than
The problem is, as you suspected, caused by ghostscript. I
downgraded to version 8.63 and it started to work again. You have
to downgrade 3 packages: libgs8, ghostscript, and ghostscript-x.
With any luck, the 8.63 versions of these packages are still in
your /var/cache/apt/archives, and you can
On Friday 03 April 2009, at 16:13 +0200, You wrote:
Hi!
With any luck, the 8.63 versions of these packages are still in
your /var/cache/apt/archives, and you can install them with dpkg
-i. Otherwise you must go to packages.debian.org and get the 8.62
versions from stable; it seems that 8.63
beatrice wrote:
I think I'll write a couple lines to Brother's customer service
anyway, now that I know I am not the only one with this
problem.
I don't know if the error is with Brother or with ghostscript. In
the meantime I filed a bug against ghostscript:
Hi!
I have a Brother HL2040 printer that worked perfectly well on my Debian
testing with the .deb driver package Brother provides. I don't have CUPS
installed, I use lpr. My printer stopped working without me changing any
system configuration other than my usual package updating via aptitude.
I
Dotan Cohen wrote:
But I just
discovered this OOo extension which allows the user to save the
document as PDF with the ODF file embedded for editing:
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/pdfimport
This is, in my opinion, the perfect document format. The only thing
missing
From that page:
It is the perfect solution for changing dates, numbers or small
portions of text.
I don't think that this practicable, if you continue to work with your
document for repeated 'edit, print' cycles.
In my experiments so far it's worked fine, but I will have to look at
the
* Tzafrir Cohen tzaf...@cohens.org.il 15.03.2009
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:47:43PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I just noticed that I can in fact print PDF files this way, so the
problem is that I am trying to print an ODT file. How can I convert
that ODT to PDF on the command line? I have
Or you can use the cups-pdf package.
That's what I am using. However, it appears that cups cannot accept an
ODF file as input. I suppose that OOo is internally converting the ODF
to PS for printing.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
Quoth Dotan Cohen at 2009-03-17 08:24...
Or you can use the cups-pdf package.
That's what I am using. However, it appears that cups cannot accept an
ODF file as input. I suppose that OOo is internally converting the ODF
to PS for printing.
Think there is a little confusion here that needs to
Matthew Smith wrote:
It would certainly be possible to write a command-line application to
convert ODF to PostScript, PDF etcetera. The document format is open
so there is nothing stopping anyone from cobbling something together
with, say Perl and XSLT. If nobody has done this and you
Think there is a little confusion here that needs to be cleared up:
ODF if not supposed to be a printable format. It is the native format used
by OOo to store its working files for editing, not printing - it is NOT a
page description language like PDF or PostScript.
I now know that. But I
I am trying to print to PDF with lpr:
$ lpr -P PDF todo.odt
I see that the file is put in the PDF jobs (using KDE's Kjobviewer)
but it doesn't get written anywhere. The $HOME/PDF directory exists,
in fact, I can print to PDF from Firefox with no problems. Any ideas
why this is not working from
I just noticed that I can in fact print PDF files this way, so the
problem is that I am trying to print an ODT file. How can I convert
that ODT to PDF on the command line? I have googled that before and
could not figure it out, even after installing OOo scripts and other
nasties.
--
Dotan Cohen
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:47:43PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I just noticed that I can in fact print PDF files this way, so the
problem is that I am trying to print an ODT file. How can I convert
that ODT to PDF on the command line? I have googled that before and
could not figure it out, even
As mentioned in previous threads: abirod should be able to do that.
Thanks, Tzafrir. I had STFW, but I obviously did not STFA.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:46:43PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Its an HP NetServer LPr, Dual P-II 450 MHz, 256 MB ram, 2x9GB SCSI drive
2U server. Its basically $60 CDN (plus tax) and I can drive to pick it
up (no shipping cost). They have 4 available. If there's a chance it
would work
Bonsoir à tous,
Sous Sarge, je n'arrive plus à imprimer plusieurs exemplaires avec la commande
lpr, par exemples: lpr -#12 bascules.ps ne m'imprime qu'un exemplaire!
L'installation de Cups ne reestreinderait-t-elle pas la commande lpr?
Merci pour vos réponses.
Alex
Créez votre adresse
LPr, Dual P-II 450 MHz, 256 MB ram, 2x9GB SCSI drive
2U server. Its basically $60 CDN (plus tax) and I can drive to pick it
up (no shipping cost). They have 4 available. If there's a chance it
would work for my wife, it would be inexpensive enough.
I've seen (and tried to boot) and IBM 6U RS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has anyone used these servers? Any gotya's?
I ran one for 2 yrs as a DNS server with 18GB SCSI. It never missed a
beat! However it was a very noisy sever.
- --
Cheers,
Julian De Marchi
- --
OpenNIC user - http://www.opennicproject.org/ |
item number 46408316.
Its an HP NetServer LPr, Dual P-II 450 MHz, 256 MB ram, 2x9GB SCSI drive
2U server. Its basically $60 CDN (plus tax) and I can drive to pick it
up (no shipping cost). They have 4 available. If there's a chance it
would work for my wife, it would be inexpensive enough
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:29:16PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/11/08 21:46, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Its an HP NetServer LPr, Dual P-II 450 MHz, 256 MB ram, 2x9GB SCSI drive
2U server. Its basically $60 CDN (plus tax) and I can drive to pick it
up (no shipping cost). They have 4 available
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:46:43 -0500
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that computers keep
getting quieter but I wonder what the fan noise would compare to, say
a dual P-133 box?
If it's anything like a LH3, expect noise like from an industrial
vacuum cleaner. Even if the noise
Pessoal,
Tenho varias estações usando Debian, tenho uma
impressora HP OfficeJet G95 ligada a um ponto de rede.
Essa impressora esta compartilhada usando o CUPS,
impressões no ambiente desktop funcionam normalmente.
Porem preciso usar o lpr em como terminal, para poder
mandar uma impressão
Rodrigo Tavares wrote:
Pessoal,
Tenho varias estações usando Debian, tenho uma
impressora HP OfficeJet G95 ligada a um ponto de rede.
Essa impressora esta compartilhada usando o CUPS,
impressões no ambiente desktop funcionam normalmente.
Porem preciso usar o lpr em como terminal, para poder
Em Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:24:02 -0300 (ART)
Rodrigo Tavares [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Porem preciso usar o lpr em como terminal, para poder
mandar uma impressão.
Para usar o cups por um terminal você deve instalar o pacote
cupusys-bsd e configura-lo: dpkg-reconfigure cupsys-bsd
--
Sávio M
Hello,
I'm running the lpd spooler with Debian Sarge. My kernel version is
2.6.8-4-686-smp (last stock kernel) and the Debian system is up to date.
My problem is with lpr/lpq. For example, sometimes lpq (or lpr) blocks
on connect(), sometimes not, it depends. When I run strace lpq :
bind(3
to end; there was a message about it this past week. Etch has
been out for a whole year now).
My problem is with lpr/lpq. For example, sometimes lpq (or lpr) blocks
on connect(), sometimes not, it depends. When I run strace lpq :
I don't know how to read a strace. What actual error message do
.
Thanks for your help.
No problem.
My problem is with lpr/lpq. For example, sometimes lpq (or lpr) blocks
on connect(), sometimes not, it depends. When I run strace lpq :
I don't know how to read a strace. What actual error message do you get
when you do whatever it is you do to cause
Is it possible obtain job number after lpr command without use lpstat?
lpstat get me all job completed and not, but with hight volume of jobs
I can't associate print and his job.
Thx.
--
Openclose.it - Idee per il software libero
http://www.openclose.it
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For printers on UNIX hosts, you probably want to use lpr:// with the
host's address in the URL. Of course, the host has to be configured to
allow remote printing, and you'll need to know the queue name.
Wow, that worked!!
[I could only find addresses
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:09:05AM +0200, s. keeling wrote:
I'll bite. It does. Install a print daemon (lpr(ng)), install
anything else that's even remotely related to printing, it drags in
CUPS, and CUPS blows away lpr(ng).
Funny, I haven't had anything drag in CUPS and blow away lpr
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:17:56AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
to choose not to use cups). I'm baffled by the source of this
continued trouble, though I don't deny its existence.
You should have stopped sooner! You're just baffled - FULL STOP!
:-)
1 - 100 of 564 matches
Mail list logo
