On 2013-11-20 17:45 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:26:21PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote:
An attribution wouldn't have hurt but it's plain to see that Jon
was replying to Emilio's message, not Ron's. Or don't mailers
show threads any more ?
Mutt, the one I use,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 05:07:52PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:52:44 +
Ron Leach ronle...@tesco.net wrote:
Hello Ron,
Jonathan, thank you for the note. I've rechecked.
I think Jonathan was directing his comments to Emilio, not you. It's
difficult to know for
On 2013-11-19 21:54 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 05:07:52PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
I think Jonathan was directing his comments to Emilio, not
you. It's difficult to know for sure as he didn't use a
name, or quote some of the offending message.
An attribution
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 05:07:52PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
I think Jonathan was directing his comments to Emilio, not you. It's
difficult to know for sure as he didn't use a name, or quote some of the
offending message.
That's right. My mailer did set in-reply-to correctly, and the message
Andre Majorel wrote:
Or don't mailers show threads any more ?
Actually many popular (but incorrect) mail user agents do not show
threads. Previously the biggest offender was Outlook. These days the
biggest offender is Gmail. I find it very surprising that a mail user
agent wouldn't handle
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 16:04 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Andre Majorel wrote:
Or don't mailers show threads any more ?
Actually many popular (but incorrect) mail user agents do not show
threads. Previously the biggest offender was Outlook. These days the
biggest offender is Gmail. I find it
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Averaged computer users very often replace the subject and body of a
message, IOW they only keep the address to write a new mail. They aren't
aware, that they keep some magic note that is hidden in a magical
header. I suspect that Gmail doesn't support it for good reasons.
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 16:29 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Averaged computer users very often replace the subject and body of a
message, IOW they only keep the address to write a new mail. They aren't
aware, that they keep some magic note that is hidden in a magical
header.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:26:21PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote:
On 2013-11-19 21:54 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 05:07:52PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
I think Jonathan was directing his comments to Emilio, not
you. It's difficult to know for sure as he didn't use
On 18/11/2013 16:33, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Hi,
I don't know what happened to quoting in your message but it was nigh-on
unreadable. It might be worth a look at your mailer settings.
Jonathan, thank you for the note. I've rechecked.
Looks OK in our mailer, looks fine from the copy from
On 18/11/13 16:52, Ron Leach wrote:
On 18/11/2013 16:33, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Hi,
I don't know what happened to quoting in your message but it was nigh-on
unreadable. It might be worth a look at your mailer settings.
Jonathan, thank you for the note. I've rechecked.
Looks OK in our
Ron Leach wrote:
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Hi,
I don't know what happened to quoting in your message but it was nigh-on
unreadable. It might be worth a look at your mailer settings.
Jonathan, thank you for the note. I've rechecked.
Looks OK in our mailer, looks fine from the copy from
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:52:44 +
Ron Leach ronle...@tesco.net wrote:
Hello Ron,
Jonathan, thank you for the note. I've rechecked.
I think Jonathan was directing his comments to Emilio, not you. It's
difficult to know for sure as he didn't use a name, or quote some of the
offending message.
13 matches
Mail list logo
