Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-06 Thread Miles Bader
Kamaraju Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That is pretty cool to know. Thanks. But this requires appending /dev/pts/1 to each and every command. Can this be done in some configuration file so that it works for each and every command? Can't you just do something like: exec

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-03 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 14:02 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: I really miss one feature from all these applications. I would like to have two terminals open side by side. All the input goes to one terminal, all the output (and errors if there are any) comes up in the second terminal.

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-03 Thread hendrik
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:02:55PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: On Monday 01 January 2007 05:51, Sridhar M.A. wrote: I do not use KDE, but found this interesting. http://nomis80.org/ From the description: QuadKonsole is a program which embeds 4 Konsoles (other numbers can

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-03 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 10:21, Sven Arvidsson wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 14:02 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: I really miss one feature from all these applications. I would like to have two terminals open side by side. All the input goes to one terminal, all the output (and errors

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-03 Thread Wesley J. Landaker
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 10:32, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: On Wednesday 03 January 2007 10:21, Sven Arvidsson wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 14:02 -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: I really miss one feature from all these applications. I would like to have two terminals open side by

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-02 Thread Thomas Dickey
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be ineterested to learn more. I have been using gnome-terminal nearly every day since I started using Debian in late 2002. I have had very few issues with gnome-terminal. From what I read on google, you're an end-user of gnome-terminal, and

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-02 Thread Thomas Dickey
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:19:34AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: It appears you didn't read the whole thread (one's mentioned ;-). I did. Jerome's single problem was mentioned in a reply to a reply to Marc's message. Marc never provided why he

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-02 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:03:59PM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:19:34AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: It appears you didn't read the whole thread (one's mentioned ;-). I did. Jerome's single problem was mentioned in a

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-02 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:55:00AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be ineterested to learn more. I have been using gnome-terminal nearly every day since I started using Debian in late 2002. I have had very few issues with gnome-terminal. From

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-02 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Monday 01 January 2007 05:51, Sridhar M.A. wrote: I do not use KDE, but found this interesting. http://nomis80.org/ From the description: QuadKonsole is a program which embeds 4 Konsoles (other numbers can be specified on the command-line). This way you save screen real estate,

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-02 Thread Thomas Dickey
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A good place to start learning would be by reading bug reports for gnome-terminal (some are older than your cited experience, but each release of gnome-terminal produces new and interesting bugs). Interesting. I guess the word regression doesn't

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-02 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:19:34AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Naturally, since he provided *zero* substantiation for his position (if you could even call it that), I asked if he had in fact used it. Now, I don't consider

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-02 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:36:16PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Is the Menu Bar supposed to be a box or not? Shows up like this in my 'Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0': http://www.geocities.com/hugovanwoerkom/robertos_page.jpeg Yes. It is

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Jhair Tocancipa Triana
Jerome BENOIT writes: Why my escape sequence which works fine on xterm does not work with gnome-terminal ? Which escape sequence are you using? -- -- Jhair -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, this one: PS1='\[\033]0;$NICKNAME:\w\007\]\[\033[40;1;37m\]$NICKNAME\[\033[0;m\] ' Jerome Jhair Tocancipa Triana wrote: Jerome BENOIT writes: Why my escape sequence which works fine on xterm does not work with gnome-terminal ? Which escape sequence are you using? -- Jerome

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Sridhar M.A.
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:40:40AM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: I use konsole all the time. It does not have all the features that multi-gnome-terminal has. For example multi-gnome-terminal has facilities to split the screen horizontally and vertically. Other than funky

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Jhair Tocancipa Triana
Jerome BENOIT writes: Hello, this one: PS1='\[\033]0;$NICKNAME:\w\007\]\[\033[40;1;37m\]$NICKNAME\[\033[0;m\] ' Yes, I see garbled characters in gnome-terminal after NICKNAME. E.g.: foo^[[0;m I tried with konsole and your escape sequence works fine there. Why my escape sequence which

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 04:57:19PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Why not just use gnome-terminal? Have you ever *used* gnome-terminal? 'Nuff said. Sure. I use it every day even though I am a WindowMaker user. I wish there

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Thomas Dickey
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 04:57:19PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Roberto

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 11:09:45PM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have *you* ever used it? He stated that he had. Perhaps when your reading comprehension improves a little beyond bouncing email around, you will enlighten us on why gnome-terminal

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Thomas Dickey
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Naturally, since he provided *zero* substantiation for his position (if you could even call it that), I asked if he had in fact used it. Now, I don't consider that bouncing email around. He did not provide a single point why gnome-terminal was

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:19:34AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Naturally, since he provided *zero* substantiation for his position (if you could even call it that), I asked if he had in fact used it. Now, I don't consider that bouncing email

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 12:37:29PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Have *you* ever used it? Yes, unfortunately I have. Its poor-at-best terminal emulation means I never will again. There's no reason to use anything other than xterm. -- Marc Wilson | That money talks, I'll not deny, I

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2007-01-01 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 08:08:25PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 12:37:29PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Have *you* ever used it? Yes, unfortunately I have. Its poor-at-best terminal emulation means I never will again. There's no reason to use anything other than

multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2006-12-31 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, I have just tried Multi-Gnome-Terminal on my new x86_64 box: it appears the terminal is filled with arbitrary caracters [ bug #345504 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=345504 Is there any good alternative, patches or workarounds ? Thanks in advance, Jerome --

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2006-12-31 Thread Jhair Tocancipa Triana
Jerome BENOIT writes: Hello List, I have just tried Multi-Gnome-Terminal on my new x86_64 box: it appears the terminal is filled with arbitrary caracters [ bug #345504 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=345504 I can reproduce this with Package: multi-gnome-terminal Version:

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2006-12-31 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 07:46:48PM +0100, Jhair Tocancipa Triana wrote: Jerome BENOIT writes: Is there any good alternative, patches or workarounds ? Maybe set the bug severity to critical? The program is unusable and not suitable for release. No!!! Please think about what you

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2006-12-31 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:24:27AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Hello List, I have just tried Multi-Gnome-Terminal on my new x86_64 box: it appears the terminal is filled with arbitrary caracters [ bug #345504 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=345504 Is there any good

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2006-12-31 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Why not just use gnome-terminal? Have you ever *used* gnome-terminal? 'Nuff said. -- Marc Wilson | Modesty: The gentle art of enhancing your charm by [EMAIL PROTECTED] | pretending not to be aware of it. -- Oliver

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2006-12-31 Thread Mathias Brodala
Hello Marc. Marc Wilson, 01.01.2007 01:57: On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Why not just use gnome-terminal? Have you ever *used* gnome-terminal? I did and do and I’m happy with it. 'Nuff said. I don’t think so. Please explain. Regards, Mathias --

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2006-12-31 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Folks, Mathias Brodala wrote: Hello Marc. Marc Wilson, 01.01.2007 01:57: On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:32:26PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Why not just use gnome-terminal? Have you ever *used* gnome-terminal? I did and do and I’m happy with it. 'Nuff said. I don’t think so.

Re: multi-gnome-terminal alternative

2006-12-31 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Sunday 31 December 2006 13:24, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Is there any good alternative, patches or workarounds ? I use konsole all the time. It does not have all the features that multi-gnome-terminal has. For example multi-gnome-terminal has facilities to split the screen horizontally and