Re: Is procmail orphaned again?

Op Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:07:46 +0100 mailingli...@vanwingerde.net schreef: > The site is down, the mailinglist is not reachable. Via https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/procmail I found the new maintainer and git: https://github.com/BuGlessRB/procmail Procmail.org is already down since 2015-11: ht

Is procmail orphaned again?

The site is down, the mailinglist is not reachable.

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

52:24AM +0200, BASSAGET Cédric wrote: > > Hello > > I'm using fetchamil / procmail to fetch mails from an POP server and > parse > > it then launch a script or system call : > > > > > > # cat .fetchmailrc > > set logfile fetchmail.log > > po

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 07:52:24AM +0200, BASSAGET Cédric wrote: > Hello > I'm using fetchamil / procmail to fetch mails from an POP server and parse > it then launch a script or system call : > > > # cat .fetchmailrc > set logfile fetchmail.log > poll imaps.dom.

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

BASSAGET Cédric (12023-06-21): > Same result : log seems fine, but /tmp/test.txt still does not exist : > > procmail: Executing " echo "whoami" > /tmp/test.txt" > procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER= echo "whoami" > /tmp/test.txt" > Su

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

Hello Tomas, Same result : log seems fine, but /tmp/test.txt still does not exist : procmail: Executing " echo "whoami" > /tmp/test.txt" procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER= echo "whoami" > /tmp/test.txt" Subject: test Folder: echo "whoami"

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

Am Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 07:52:24AM +0200 schrieb BASSAGET Cédric: Bonjour Cédric, > Hello > I'm using fetchamil / procmail to fetch mails from an POP server and parse > it then launch a script or system call : [...] > This work fine when calling fetchamil as root with &

Re: fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 07:52:24AM +0200, BASSAGET Cédric wrote: > Hello > I'm using fetchamil / procmail to fetch mails from an POP server and parse > it then launch a script or system call : > > > # cat .fetchmailrc > set logfile fetchmail.log > poll imaps.dom.

fetchamil / procmail as non root : unable to call script

Hello I'm using fetchamil / procmail to fetch mails from an POP server and parse it then launch a script or system call : # cat .fetchmailrc set logfile fetchmail.log poll imaps.dom.tld proto POP3 user "u...@dom.tld" pass "xx" preconnect "date >> ~/fetchmail.lo

Re: Gnus/procmail doesn't read new mails

Eric S Fraga writes: > Just in case, what happens if you expand "~" in the path to PROCMAIL? That was one of the first things I've tested but that didn't change anything. urs

Re: Gnus/procmail doesn't read new mails

Just in case, what happens if you expand "~" in the path to PROCMAIL? -- Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 29.0.50 2022-11-10) on Debian 11.4

Gnus/procmail doesn't read new mails

I want to move my mail server and Gnus MUA from a very old machine (emacs 20.7.1 and gnus 5.8.8) to a Debian bullseye machine with emacs and Gnus 5.13. The mail is filtered by procmail into several files in the ~/PROCMAIL directory. From there it should be read by Gnus and stored in mail groups

Re: Procmail no filtra correctamente

http://www.linuxsc.net/filtrado-de-correo-con-procmail/ Enviado desde mi Samsung Mobile de Telcel Obtener Outlook para Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> De: Aaron D. Enviado: jueves, 11 de febrero de 2021 03:37 Para: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org

Re: Procmail no filtra correctamente

El 2021-02-11 a las 10:37 +0100, Aaron D. escribió: > Buenos días lista, tengo un problema con el siguiente filtro de > procmail: > > :0: > * ^From: noveda...@amazon.es > publicity/ > > El resto de filtros (como de la lista) funcionan perfectamente, pero > los

Procmail no filtra correctamente

Buenos días lista, tengo un problema con el siguiente filtro de procmail: :0: * ^From: noveda...@amazon.es publicity/ El resto de filtros (como de la lista) funcionan perfectamente, pero los correos de amazon me siguen llegando al inbox (la dirección es correcta). Alguna idea? -- Aaron D

Re: maildir + procmail/mutt

; * ^Subject.*SPAM > $MAILDIR/spam/ > > :0 > * ^(To|Cc).*cosmo@particula > $MAILDIR/inbox/ > ## > > > saida do log: > > procmail: Match on "^Subject.*SPAM*" > procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=./spam/new/1561747667.2655_0.se

Re: maildir + procmail/mutt

OME/Maildir0/ DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/ LOGFILE=/tmp/teste123.txt :0 * ^Subject.*SPAM $MAILDIR/spam/ :0 * ^(To|Cc).*cosmo@particula $MAILDIR/inbox/###### saida do log: procmail: Match on "^Subject.*SPAM*" procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=./spam/new/1561747667.26

Re: maildir + procmail/mutt

Prezado jmhenrique Consegui evoluir. .fetchmailrc set logfile /home/cosmo/fetchmail.log poll email.particula.local protocol imap username “USUARIO" password “SENHA" mda "/usr/bin/procmail -d %T"; .procmailrc SHELL=/bin/zsh

Re: maildir + procmail/mutt

:15Para: debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.orgAssunto: Re: maildir + procmail/mutt Prezado henrique Vamos lá, eu fiz o seguinte:## Estacao#$ sudo cat /etc/procmailrc DEFAULT="$HOME/Maildir/" MAILDIR="$HOME/Maildir/"$ cat .fetchmailrc set logfile /home/cosmo/fetchmail.log

Re: maildir + procmail/mutt

.local protocol imap: username “USUARIO" password “SENHA"; folder ‘Maildir' mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail -d %T” $ cat .procmailrc PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/ DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/

Re: maildir + procmail/mutt

a acessar o servidor de e-mail. Funcionou corretamente.  3 - postfix + dovecot(imap) + fetchmail/procmail + muttO problema esta aqui. Eu estou tendo problemas para configurar o procmail para que o mesmo possa trabalhar com pasta Maildir e possa filtrar os e-mails e redirecionar para as respectivas p

Re: maildir + procmail/mutt

tórios Maildir/{cur,new,tmp} com os > respectivos e-mails de teste. > > 2 - postfix + dovecot(imap) + mutt > Depois de configurar o postfix, fiz a instalação e configuração do Dovecot > (IMAP). Esta funcionando corretamente. > > https://github.com/abreuferr/lpi/blob/master/202/doc/2

maildir + procmail/mutt

(imap) + fetchmail/procmail + mutt O problema esta aqui. Eu estou tendo problemas para configurar o procmail para que o mesmo possa trabalhar com pasta Maildir e possa filtrar os e-mails e redirecionar para as respectivas pastas configuradas no arquivos .procmailrc. Para fazer o download das

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

r 06, 2017 at 09:59:16PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > > On Monday 06 March 2017 21:47:42 Andy Smith wrote: > > > > > > Hi Gene, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > &g

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Monday 06 March 2017 21:47:42 Andy Smith wrote: > > > > > Hi Gene, > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > > > > > &

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

gt; > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > > > > > > > procmail is still in Debian stretch and if it still works for > > > > you then it shou

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

formail can also force correct formatting on incoming email. On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Henning Follmann wrote: Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:43:17 From: Henning Follmann <hfollm...@itcfollmann.com> To: Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: procmai

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > > > > > procmail is still in Debian stretch and if it still works for you > > > then it should continue to work for you. > > > > > I wanted to add a formail line but the

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:59:16PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 06 March 2017 21:47:42 Andy Smith wrote: > > > Hi Gene, > > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > >

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? I still use procmail myself, but I do think about moving away one day. If you are using Exim, and if your mail arrival route is via your Exim (you mention fetchmail in follow-up email but I

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Monday 06 March 2017 21:54:26 Andy Smith wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:47:42AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > Oh, and procmail is not an MTA (and neither

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Monday 06 March 2017 21:47:42 Andy Smith wrote: > Hi Gene, > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? > > procmail is still in Debian stretch and if it still works for you > then it should continue to

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:47:42AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? Oh, and procmail is not an MTA (and neither is maildrop…), but more correctly a Mail Delivery Agent, but I got what

Re: procmail, when were the last rights administered?

Hi Gene, On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:29:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > And what replaces it in the MTA dept? procmail is still in Debian stretch and if it still works for you then it should continue to work for you. More modern alternatives include Sieve: http://sieve.info/clie

procmail, when were the last rights administered?

And what replaces it in the MTA dept? Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page

Re: postfix or procmail

Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android

Re: procmail

El día 22 de octubre de 2014, 16:34, Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es escribió: Si ese es el log del usuario, entonces ya vamos mal, porque procmail, cuando entrega un mensaje a un usuario, suele hacerlo con la identidad del propio usuario, y si el fichero log es de root y del grupo postfix

Re: procmail

El Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:40:17 -0600, ricky gutierrez escribió: saludos lista , estoy lidiando con una configuración de procmail y los mensajes marcados como spam por mi amavisd+spamassassin , la idea es qu mueva todo los mensajes marcados como spam a una carpeta llamada Spam dentro de su home

Re: procmail

perfecto. X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 10.67 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.67 Comprueba también que no haya ningún archivo de Postfix que invalide el archivo de configuración de Procmail ya que Postfix tendrá preferencia. la verdad no , he probado tanto como en /etc

Re: procmail

incluirse sólo en determinados casos. Hola , lo esta haciendo perfecto. X-Spam-Flag: YES (...) Perfecto pues. No sé si habrás probado con la receta del enlace que te pasado, que parece bastante sencilla: # Catch SPAM :0: * ^X-Spam-Flag: YES Spam Como te he dicho antes de Procmail estoy

Re: procmail

Se parece al que tenia anteriormente. Como te he dicho antes de Procmail estoy pez pero yo comprobaría si permite trabajar con el formato maildir o si hay que configurar algo especial para que reconozca este tipo de buzones. Más enlacitos 8:-) Procmail recipes for Maildir folders http

Re: procmail

El Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:30:52 -0600, ricky gutierrez escribió: El día 23 de octubre de 2014, 9:13, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: (...) Comprueba también que no haya ningún archivo de Postfix que invalide el archivo de configuración de Procmail ya que Postfix tendrá preferencia. la

Re: procmail

Bueno al final me cance de procmail , estoy medio hechando a andar sieve con dovecot , pero abrire otro hilo. slsss El día 23 de octubre de 2014, 10:04, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió: El Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:30:52 -0600, ricky gutierrez escribió: El día 23 de octubre de 2014, 9:13

procmail

saludos lista , estoy lidiando con una configuración de procmail y los mensajes marcados como spam por mi amavisd+spamassassin , la idea es qu mueva todo los mensajes marcados como spam a una carpeta llamada Spam dentro de su home/maildir . estoy usando maildir y postfixadmin con usuarios

Re: procmail

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:40:17PM -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote: [ problemas con procmail ] alguna idea? Añade LOGFILE=fichero-escribible y mira dentro para ver qué sucede. Si no es suficiente añade también VERBOSE=yes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ

Re: procmail

...@unex.es: On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:40:17PM -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote: [ problemas con procmail ] alguna idea? Añade LOGFILE=fichero-escribible y mira dentro para ver qué sucede. Si no es suficiente añade también VERBOSE=yes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ

Re: procmail

/$DOMAIN/$USER/ LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/procmail.log VERBOSE = yes : ^X-Spam-Flag.*YES .Spam/ 2014-10-22 14:39 GMT-06:00 Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es: On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:40:17PM -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote: [ problemas con procmail ] alguna idea? Añade LOGFILE=fichero-escribible y mira dentro

Re: procmail

.Spam/ 2014-10-22 14:39 GMT-06:00 Santiago Vila sanv...@unex.es: On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:40:17PM -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote: [ problemas con procmail ] alguna idea? Añade LOGFILE=fichero-escribible y mira dentro para ver qué sucede. Si no es suficiente añade también VERBOSE=yes

Re: procmail

El miércoles, 22 oct 2014 a las 23:45 horas (UTC+2), ricky gutierrez escribió: No , los permisos los veo bien #ls -l procmail.log -rwxrwx--- 1 root postfix 0 Oct 22 15:20 procmail.log dentro del directorio del usuario Te lo comento porque hace mcho usé procmail, y recuerdo problemas de

Re: procmail

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:45:22PM -0600, ricky gutierrez wrote: No , los permisos los veo bien #ls -l procmail.log -rwxrwx--- 1 root postfix 0 Oct 22 15:20 procmail.log dentro del directorio del usuario Si ese es el log del usuario, entonces ya vamos mal, porque procmail, cuando entrega

procmail et rbl

Bonjour, je recherche quelques règles pouvant être employées avec procmail et les listes rbl et sbl ( spamcop et spamhaus ) pour l'instant j'ai installé rblcheck et j'ai perdu quelques courriels du fait que je n'avais pas correctement renseigné une valeur

Procmail them out of your life: was how to auto-configure network adapter (ie. enable internet access)?

him go offline completely! Seriously, Andrew (and everyone else), why not make Debian-Users life more pleasant for yourself, and simply procmail those you consider a waste of bandwidth out of your life. I've procmailed out 13 Debian-Users people so far, and now I find less conflict on the list, and I

procmail et clamav

bonjour, je n'ai pas trouvé de règle pour clamav et procmail slt bernard -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org En

Re: procmail et clamav

Le Thu, 5 Jun 2014 17:27:25 +0200, Bernard Schoenacker bernard.schoenac...@free.fr a écrit : bonjour, je n'ai pas trouvé de règle pour clamav et procmail slt bernard bonjour, j'ai trouvé chez ubuntu (manpage) la recette qui convient : http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/dapper

Re: procmail et clamav

Bernard Schoenacker a écrit : Le Thu, 5 Jun 2014 17:27:25 +0200, Bernard Schoenacker bernard.schoenac...@free.fr a écrit : bonjour, je n'ai pas trouvé de règle pour clamav et procmail slt bernard bonjour, j'ai trouvé chez ubuntu (manpage) la recette qui convient : http

Re: procmail et clamav

Le Thu, 05 Jun 2014 18:08:45 +0200, BERTRAND Joël joel.bertr...@systella.fr a écrit : Bernard Schoenacker a écrit : Le Thu, 5 Jun 2014 17:27:25 +0200, Bernard Schoenacker bernard.schoenac...@free.fr a écrit : bonjour, je n'ai pas trouvé de règle pour clamav et procmail slt

Re: procmail et clamav

On 05/06/2014 17:27, Bernard Schoenacker wrote: bonjour, je n'ai pas trouvé de règle pour clamav et procmail # anti-virus :0HB: * ! ? (formail | clamdscan --quiet -) * ? echo emetteur reel $FROM $LOGFILE | formail -AX-Procmail: virus trouvé infected -- Francois Mescam Tel:+33 6 16 05 77

Re: procmail et clamav

Le Thu, 05 Jun 2014 18:39:58 +0200, Francois Mescam franc...@mescam.org a écrit : On 05/06/2014 17:27, Bernard Schoenacker wrote: bonjour, je n'ai pas trouvé de règle pour clamav et procmail # anti-virus :0HB: * ! ? (formail | clamdscan --quiet -) * ? echo emetteur reel $FROM $LOGFILE

Re: postfix or procmail

Things like that, with procmail, could cause several loops, especially when is flavored with the c flag. You should consider use a solution at postfix's level only. Anyway, you could also do something with isabel's procmailrc, example: /home/isabel/.procmailrc And write inside this: :0c * From

postfix o procmail

' /etc/postfix/main.cf Con procmail he probado y tampoco sin resultado con Procmail hize esto :0 c * ^From.*cuentaexte...@abc.com ! p...@midominio.com ma...@midominio.com o sea todo lo que entre de la cuentaexte...@abc.com sea renviado a esas cuentas o esto :0 c * ^From.*cuentaexte

postfix o procmail

' /etc/postfix/main.cf Con procmail he probado y tampoco sin resultado con Procmail hize esto :0 c * ^From.*cuentaexte...@abc.com ! p...@midominio.com ma...@midominio.com o sea todo lo que entre de la cuentaexte...@abc.com sea renviado a esas cuentas o esto :0 c * ^From.*cuentaexte

Re: postfix o procmail

That reminds me of awesome people hanging out together, Simone de Beauvoir, Jean Paul Sartre and Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara (Cuba, 1960): http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmul2aM3m71qearaqo1_1280.jpg _But_ the international mailing list for Debian is an English language mailing list.

postfix or procmail

Hi All day I receive an email from external account u...@external.com it reaches a user of my local domain isabel@mydomain, need to automatically be forwarded to other users on my domain and maria pepe. I use Debian 6 and postfix 2.7 I tried aliases and postfix, also with procmail something

Re: postfix or procmail

to automatically be forwarded to other users on my domain and maria pepe. I use Debian 6 and postfix 2.7 I tried aliases and postfix, also with procmail something like this echo multiples: pepe maria /etc/aliases postalias /etc/aliases echo '/^From:.user@external\.com/iREDIRECT multip

postfix o procmail

Hola He estado buscando la forma de que los correo entrantes de una cuenta externa sean reenviados a varias cuentas de correo internas con Procmail hize esto :0 c * ^From.*cuentaexte...@abc.com ! p...@midominio.com ma...@midominio.com o sea todo lo que entre de la cuentaexte...@abc.com sea

Re: postfix o procmail

El 11/07/13 20:08, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu escribió: Hola He estado buscando la forma de que los correo entrantes de una cuenta externa sean reenviados a varias cuentas de correo internas con Procmail hize esto :0 c * ^From.*cuentaexte...@abc.com ! p...@midominio.com ma...@midominio.com o sea

Re: Procmail no funciona

On 15/05/13 12:21, co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu wrote: Hola Alguien que haya podido hacer funcionar el procmail que pudiera dar una mano, no hay forma que me trabaje con postfix, no sé que estoy haciendo mal. /etc/procmailrc ?Como debe ir el fichero de configuración? Ejemplo como hacer para que

Procmail no funciona

Hola Alguien que haya podido hacer funcionar el procmail que pudiera dar una mano, no hay forma que me trabaje con postfix, no sé que estoy haciendo mal. /etc/procmailrc ?Como debe ir el fichero de configuración? Ejemplo como hacer para que los correos entrantes no se dupliquen ni tripliquen

Re: Procmail no funciona

El 15/5/2013 10:21 a.m., co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu escribi: Hola Alguien que haya podido hacer funcionar el procmail que pudiera dar una mano, no hay forma que me trabaje con postfix, no s que estoy haciendo mal. /etc/procmailrc ?Como debe ir el fichero de configuracin

Procmail does not work

Hi Someone who has been running the procmail that could give a hand, there is no way that I work with postfix, I know I'm doing wrong. /etc/procmailrc? Because you must go to the configuration file? Example how to make incoming messages are not duplicated or triple, etc.. To work on cosets

Re: Procmail does not work

co...@esid.gecgr.co.cu grabbed a keyboard and wrote: Hi Someone who has been running the procmail that could give a hand, there is no way that I work with postfix, I know I'm doing wrong. /etc/procmailrc? Because you must go to the configuration file? Here is what is in my /etc

[Fwd: Re: Procmail does not work]

Hi David I did exactly as you said but still not working with the line mailbox_command = procmai -a $EXTENSION in Postfix and the configuration file in /etc/promailrc check this out $ cat /etc/procmailrc SHELL=/bin/bash SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -t LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log

Dudas con procmail

Hola Alguien me pudiera poner un ejemplo de como configurar procmail en Debian squeeze quiero poner reglas para todos los usuarios por lo que debo ponerlo en /etc/procmailrc ?Como debe ir el fichero de configuración? Ejemplo como hacer para que los correos entrantes no se dupliquen ni

Re: procmail en Debian

como configurar procmail en Debian squeeze quiero poner reglas para todos los usuarios por lo que debo ponerlo en /etc/procmailrc Ejemplo como hacer para que los correos entrantes no se dupliquen ni tripliquen, etc. me inmagino que en el postfix debo activar la linea mailbox_command

procmail en Debian

Hola Alguien me pudiera poner un ejemplo de como configurar procmail en Debian squeeze quiero poner reglas para todos los usuarios por lo que debo ponerlo en /etc/procmailrc Ejemplo como hacer para que los correos entrantes no se dupliquen ni tripliquen, etc. me inmagino que en el postfix debo

Re: [Postfix/procmail/dovecot] mbox et maildir : pourquoi tant de haine ?

Bonjour, Bonsoir, Le Sun, 6 Jan 2013 15:35:11 +0100, Bzzz, vous avez écrit : On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 14:21:16 +0100 Grégory Bulot debian.list200...@batman.dyndns.org wrote: - Arrivent en mbox dans /var/mail/%u - Arrivent après traitement procmail(rc) en Maildir Actuellement : - Les

[Postfix/procmail/dovecot] mbox et maildir : pourquoi tant de haine ?

Bonjour, Ayant mon propre serveur de mails, je souhaiterais que mes mails : - Arrivent en mbox dans /var/mail/%u - Arrivent après traitement procmail(rc) en Maildir Actuellement : - Les mails arrivent bien en mbox dans /var/mail/%u - mon procmailrc est bien pris en charge mais les mails sont

Re: [Postfix/procmail/dovecot] mbox et maildir : pourquoi tant de haine ?

Bonjour, Bonsoir, Le Sun, 6 Jan 2013 14:21:16 +0100, Grégory Bulot, vous avez écrit : Mon .procmailrc MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/ LOGFILE=$HOME/procmail.log :0 * ^Return-Path:.r...@mondomain.com $MAILDIR/local/ La dernière ligne n'est pas bonne écriture (le point) : $MAILDIR/.local/

Re: [Postfix/procmail/dovecot] mbox et maildir : pourquoi tant de haine ?

On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 14:21:16 +0100 Grégory Bulot debian.list200...@batman.dyndns.org wrote: - Arrivent en mbox dans /var/mail/%u - Arrivent après traitement procmail(rc) en Maildir Actuellement : - Les mails arrivent bien en mbox dans /var/mail/%u - mon procmailrc est bien pris en charge

postfix, fetchmail, procmail - y'a comme un hic

faire tourner ça en sid, mais c'est quand même la 1ère fois que ça arrive (avant, j'ai seulement eu un svr non-opérationnel comme pire panne). Donc, je me dis que c'est ptêt la partie fetchmail/procmail qui fait ça et je commente les règles spécifique à cet ami, mais nan: ce matin même topo. Je

Re: postfix, fetchmail, procmail - y'a comme un hic

, relay=local, delay=0.3, delays=0.13/0.03/0/0.14, dsn=2.0.0, status =sent (delivered to command: /usr/bin/procmail) Dec 20 04:34:17 anubis postfix/qmgr[4559]: 87F8E6382C4: removed Le mail a donc bien été confié à procmail. As-tu regardé le fichier de log de procmail ? C'est verbeux mais

Re: postfix, fetchmail, procmail - y'a comme un hic

On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:22:15 +0100 Sébastien NOBILI sebnewslet...@free.fr wrote: Le mail a donc bien été confié à procmail. As-tu regardé le fichier de log de procmail ? C'est verbeux mais instructif… Pas sûr que tu puisses te baser sur « message-id » pour identifier les lignes

Re: procmail filtering

On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:14:57AM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: lee: I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox format which I dont want. Formail doesn't actually save the mailboxes anywhere, procmail does that. And if you append a slash to the mailbox name

Re: procmail filtering

On 07/05/2012 02:41 PM, Jon Dowland wrote: You can run procmail in filter mode and pipe it each mail that you wish to filter individually, but you must keep track of which mails have been piped to procmail and remove them/mark them 'processed' yourself, via shell scripts etc. Make sure your

Re: procmail filtering

On 07/05/2012 09:59 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: lee wrote: I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox format which I dont want. With Maildir format you don't need formail. Just pipe each individual message to procmail. Of the top of my head and untested: for m

procmail filtering

Hi. probably not the best list to ask, but i've been trying and searching for awhile now, with not much success. I'm looking for a way to run my procmail filters on a directory containing emails I would like to filter. I'm using a Maildir email directory setup. I've looked at formail + procmail

Re: procmail filtering

lee: I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox format which I dont want. Formail doesn't actually save the mailboxes anywhere, procmail does that. And if you append a slash to the mailbox name, procmail generates maildirs. Example: MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/ LOGFILE

Re: procmail filtering

You can run procmail in filter mode and pipe it each mail that you wish to filter individually, but you must keep track of which mails have been piped to procmail and remove them/mark them 'processed' yourself, via shell scripts etc. Make sure your procmail recipe(s) deliver to a sensible

Re: procmail filtering

lee wrote: I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox format which I dont want. With Maildir format you don't need formail. Just pipe each individual message to procmail. Of the top of my head and untested: for m in Maildir/new/* Maildir/cur/*; do procmail

Re: [SOLVE] Debian exim4 procmail mysql

te faltaba configurar en Procmail la ruta donde se encuentran almacenados los mensajes ¿no? Y la bitácora me ayudo a solucionar el problema. ¿Qué bitácora? :-? Saludos, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-spanish-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: [SOLVE] Debian exim4 procmail mysql

. Hola Tengo una configuración como la que menciono en el subject. Sucede que cuando recibo correo, los filtros de procmail no funcionan. Básicamente lo que hice para utilizar procmail con exim4 fue nada, porque en la configuración de  router y transport de exim4 ya viene la configuración para

Re: Debian exim4 procmail mysql

sentencia SQL, ¿alguien tiene idea? (...) my.domain.com in +local_domains? yes (matched +local_domains) checking for local user seeking password data for user usuario: using cached result getpwnam() returned NULL (user not found) procmail router skipped: usuario is not a local user Pues ni idea

Debian exim4 procmail mysql

Hola Tengo una configuración como la que menciono en el subject. Sucede que cuando recibo correo, los filtros de procmail no funcionan. Básicamente lo que hice para utilizar procmail con exim4 fue nada, porque en la configuración de  router y transport de exim4 ya viene la configuración para

Re: procmail, problem with this delivering recipe

action line, but that doesn't prevent me from concatenating consequent lines together with a trailing '\', just like what I'm doing in make as well. All those complicated piping will form a *single* action line. I've checked the log, procmail is OK with that, no error or complains, and I get

Re: procmail, problem with this delivering recipe

On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 03:40:24 +, T o n g wrote: # send header only [ . . . ] I.e., having processed it, procmail went on with the following recipes instead of considering the mail delivered and cease processing the rcfile. Hmm... looks like procmail considered the mail *header

Re: procmail, problem with this delivering recipe

T o n g wrote: :0 Hfhwi * ^Subject: \/.* | formail -b -c -X From: -X To: -X Subject: -X Date: . . . | $SENDMAIL $SENDMAILFLAGS . . . You need to create another recipe for the second pipe. :0 Hfhwi * ^Subject: \/.* | formail -b -c -X From: -X To: -X Subject: -X Date: . . .

Re: procmail, problem with this delivering recipe

commands between formail $SENDMAIL in my rcfile. Yes. But as noted that is incorrect. Only one action line is allowed there. If I need to do something more complicated then normally I create a script and put all of the complication there and simply call it. Now procmail considers the mail

Re: Procmail regular expression: word end boundary matching

T o n g wrote: Bob Proulx wrote: I think it is a bug in the \ expansion. OMG, I thought it would be very hard for anyone to find out the answer. THANKS A LOT. works like a charm. That seems to be an okay workaround but it still looks like a bug. Since I use procmail a lot it motivated

Re: Procmail regular expression: word end boundary matching

T o n g wrote: I seems not able to get the word end boundary matching for procmail works. Here is my test rc file: :0 HB * 1^0 \test\ * 1^0 test /dev/null and there is a ' test ' in my test email. However, from the dry run log, I can see that '\test\' did not match yet 'test' did

Re: Postfix procmail maildir

: /usr/bin/procmail -a $EXTENSION) Aug 11 20:32:44 neo postfix/qmgr[6740]: 4D7EC49811: removed -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe vers debian-user-french-requ

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >