Nathan E Norman wrote:
Do you realise you quoted 40 lines of the original message and added 1
meaningful line? What a waste of bandwidth.
hah. my 1meg dsl line runs average at 2.8% for the past week,
i got plenty of bandwidth to spare :P
http://portal.aphroland.org/mrtg/
nate
--
:::
ICQ:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 12:01:48AM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
Nathan E Norman wrote:
Do you realise you quoted 40 lines of the original message and added 1
meaningful line? What a waste of bandwidth.
hah. my 1meg dsl line runs average at 2.8% for the past week,
i got plenty of bandwidth
Subject: Re: putting Apache into chroot()-prison
Date: Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:19:53PM -0600
In reply to:Nathan E Norman
Quoting Nathan E Norman([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No, it's a company as demonstrated by the Micromuse Inc.. `whois
micromuse.com', and a look at http
From what I've been able to gather,
chroot can be secure,
but only if the user can never get root.
FreeBSD's jail had a recent problem.
Mounting /proc inside the chroot is not a good idea.
In a message dated 12/27/00 7:01:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
not to
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:57:27PM -0800 or thereabouts, Nate Amsden wrote:
R. M. Lampert wrote:
Hi, folks!
Due to some very unpleasant experience in the company
I'm working at (rootshell attack due to a buffer overflow
intrusion in httpd...) there's a great need with us
to
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:50PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:57:27PM -0800 or thereabouts, Nate Amsden wrote:
[ 21 lines deleted ]
not to discourage youb ut its pretty well known chroot() is not
an ultimate solution for security, it has been in the past
rather
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:02:03PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Norman,
The name's Nathan ... I realize it's a difficult name to parse.
As an unbiased observer I will comment on your
comment concerning the quote/content ratio of the other
poster. You have your preferences.
Hi, folks!
Due to some very unpleasant experience in the company
I'm working at (rootshell attack due to a buffer overflow
intrusion in httpd...) there's a great need with us
to inform thoroughly about changing to a safer environment,
that is LAMP or even better NAMP (NetBSD, Apache ... there
Here are a couple links which should help you get on your way.
(Thanks to Stas Bekman, just another mod_perl hacker)
http://www.securityfocus.com/focus/sun/articles/apache-inst.html
http://forum.swarthmore.edu/epigone/modperl/stimlorthen
R. M. Lampert wrote:
Hi, folks!
Due to some very unpleasant experience in the company
I'm working at (rootshell attack due to a buffer overflow
intrusion in httpd...) there's a great need with us
to inform thoroughly about changing to a safer environment,
that is LAMP or even better
10 matches
Mail list logo
