Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-18 Thread tomas
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 04:18:48PM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: [...] > On Sun, 18 Sep 2022, jr wrote: > > > hi, > > > > (sorry, late to the party :-)) > > > > I don't think 'script' has been mentioned yet, a neat way (imo) to > > record the console/terminal. > > > I like tee more than script

Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-18 Thread ghe2001
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ofSomePossibleUse... Back in 2008 or so, I wrote some software for a friend who was teaching at a B/VI school for kids in Austin, Texas. There's still parts missing, and it's not been tidied up for max speed. And it was written in objective-c:

Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-18 Thread Jude DaShiell
Jude "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) . On Sun, 18 Sep 2022, jr wrote: > hi, > > (sorry, late to the party :-)) > > I don't think 'script' has been mentioned yet, a neat way

Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-18 Thread jr
hi, (sorry, late to the party :-)) I don't think 'script' has been mentioned yet, a neat way (imo) to record the console/terminal.

Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-18 Thread Karen Lewellen
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022, Greg Wooledge wrote: However, the solution ultimately didn't involve any specific features of links. The problem was solved at a different layer (terminal multiplexer). Actually, no it did not, because our solution produced an error, with my ending up solving the problem

Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-18 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 12:23:19AM -0700, dmacdoug wrote: > The OP addressed her question to "seasoned links users" so I'd say > those who have nothing constructive to contribute toward helping her > should just skip the thread if top posting makes them angry. However, the solution ultimately

Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-18 Thread dmacdoug
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 08:07:15AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 04:17:45PM -0400, Maude Summerside wrote: > > [...] > > > Screen reader or not, what don't you understand by STOP TOP POSTING ? > > Look. I hate top posting as every other person. Especially in mailing >

Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-18 Thread tomas
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 04:17:45PM -0400, Maude Summerside wrote: [...] > Screen reader or not, what don't you understand by STOP TOP POSTING ? Look. I hate top posting as every other person. Especially in mailing lists, i think it's disruptive for longer threads. But please, try to be polite

Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-17 Thread Lee
On 9/17/22, Maude Summerside wrote: <.. snip ..> > Screen reader or not, what don't you understand by STOP TOP POSTING ? *plonk*

Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-17 Thread Maude Summerside
On 2022-09-17 11:55, Karen Lewellen wrote: > Given in my first post I *stated was using a screen reader* the sight > factor  was stated. > Not that searching for shellworld contributed to my question being > answered, or its solution. > For the record, another company owns shellworld now.

Re: shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-17 Thread Karen Lewellen
Given in my first post I *stated was using a screen reader* the sight factor was stated. Not that searching for shellworld contributed to my question being answered, or its solution. For the record, another company owns shellworld now. On Sat, 17 Sep 2022, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: On

shellworld.net (for visually impaired users), (was: Re: question for seasoned links users?)

2022-09-17 Thread rhkramer
On Saturday, September 17, 2022 04:28:40 AM David wrote: > On Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 16:07, Karen Lewellen > Every other time when you have asked questions here, I have tried but > been unable to find any information at all about shellworld.net. A google search for shellworld.net provides hints (I