On 4/09/21 9:26 pm, Brian wrote:
On Sat 04 Sep 2021 at 21:21:38 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
Greg Wooledge pointed out in another thread that 'type' is often better than
'which' for finding out what kind of command you're about to run, and where
it comes from.
A quick test, however, threw up
On Sat 04 Sep 2021 at 21:21:38 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
> Greg Wooledge pointed out in another thread that 'type' is often better than
> 'which' for finding out what kind of command you're about to run, and where
> it comes from.
>
> A quick test, however, threw up another issue:
>
>
On 9/4/2021 11:21 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
Greg Wooledge pointed out in another thread that 'type' is often better
than 'which' for finding out what kind of command you're about to run,
and where it comes from.
A quick test, however, threw up another issue:
richard@zircon:~$ type ls
ls is
Greg Wooledge pointed out in another thread that 'type' is often better
than 'which' for finding out what kind of command you're about to run,
and where it comes from.
A quick test, however, threw up another issue:
richard@zircon:~$ type ls
ls is aliased to `ls --color=auto'
Great, so it's
4 matches
Mail list logo