Re: x-terminal-emulator xterm [SOLVED]

2002-05-14 Thread Andy Saxena
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 07:49:36PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: * Andy Saxena ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020508 18:44]: Even if an executable can tell whether or not it is being called by a symlink, why should the xterm binary be coded to disregard the ~/.Xresources file? Well, technically

Re: x-terminal-emulator xterm [SOLVED]

2002-05-14 Thread Andy Saxena
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 07:41:28PM -0700, Eric G. Miller wrote: On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:44:30PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote: I am still not certain how this applies to my original question. Even if an executable can tell whether or not it is being called by a symlink, why should the

Re: x-terminal-emulator xterm

2002-05-08 Thread Andy Saxena
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 12:40:26AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: * Andy Saxena ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020505 23:16]: Hi, For some reason, when I invoke x-terminal-emulator, which points to xterm, results in different background, foreground, etc. settings than if I were to invoke xterm

Re: x-terminal-emulator xterm

2002-05-08 Thread Eric G. Miller
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 12:41:28AM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote: On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 12:40:26AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: [snip] It is on some levels; the symlink is dereferenced to get to the actual code of the executable. A program can tell how it was called by looking at argv[0],

Re: x-terminal-emulator xterm

2002-05-08 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Eric G. Miller (egm2@jps.net) [020508 01:28]: On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 12:41:28AM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote: On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 12:40:26AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: [snip] It is on some levels; the symlink is dereferenced to get to the actual code of the executable. A program can

Re: x-terminal-emulator xterm

2002-05-08 Thread Andy Saxena
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 11:00:14AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: As for taking different actions based on the command by which a program was called, look at the fsck family, bzless and bzmore, mh's show, next, and prev, and a lot of other things that show up in find / -type f | -links 1 =). Oh,

Re: x-terminal-emulator xterm

2002-05-08 Thread Eric G. Miller
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:44:30PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote: I am still not certain how this applies to my original question. Even if an executable can tell whether or not it is being called by a symlink, why should the xterm binary be coded to disregard the ~/.Xresources file? IMHO, it

Re: x-terminal-emulator xterm

2002-05-08 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Andy Saxena ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020508 18:44]: Even if an executable can tell whether or not it is being called by a symlink, why should the xterm binary be coded to disregard the ~/.Xresources file? Well, technically speaking, xterm never reads the .Xresources file at all. That file is

x-terminal-emulator xterm

2002-05-06 Thread Andy Saxena
Hi, For some reason, when I invoke x-terminal-emulator, which points to xterm, results in different background, foreground, etc. settings than if I were to invoke xterm directly. In general, if xterm is invoked via a symlink, the result is different! I was under the impression that invoking a

Re: x-terminal-emulator xterm

2002-05-06 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Andy Saxena ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020505 23:16]: Hi, For some reason, when I invoke x-terminal-emulator, which points to xterm, results in different background, foreground, etc. settings than if I were to invoke xterm directly. It has to do with the way xterm loads its X Resources. These

Re: x-terminal-emulator xterm

2002-05-06 Thread David Roundy
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 12:40:26AM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: In general, if xterm is invoked via a symlink, the result is different! I was under the impression that invoking a program via a symlink is transparent as far as the execution context of the program is concerned. It is on some