On Sat, 04 Sep 2021 18:08:18 -0500
"David Palacio" wrote:
> I have compared my previous install nft ruleset and installed
> packages list with the current install and found that firewalld
> wasn't installed in the working system but ufw was. The nft ruleset
> was nearly identical save for the
> In /root/.bashrc I use this to give a red prompt including host and
> full path followed by a new line.
I take this idea a bit further, setting a longer prompt and setting
workstation hosts for specific colors for user logins, and then doing a red
prompt for servers.
Part of my
On Sat 04 Sep 2021 at 23:04:49 (-0300), Dedeco Balaco wrote:
>
> today, i started to upgrade my computer from Debian 9 (Stretch) to
> Debian 11 (Bullseye). I had some trouble finding what i wanted to do, a
> completely internet based upgrade, if possible. In the Debian
> documention, i did not
On Fri 03 Sep 2021 at 02:45:03 (+0100), piorunz wrote:
> On 03/09/2021 01:34, David Wright wrote:
> > (I use my own customisations for distinct colours on each host,
> > and inverse colours for root's prompt.)
>
> Can you please share your root prompt invocation? Thanks!
Sure. The colours come
Hi,
I have this `phwmon.py`[1] which I use with fluxbox to have a couple
of system monitors at hand. It depends on some python2 packages, so
stopped working some time ago.
I've just made it work, installing manually (# apt-get install packages.deb)
this packages that I've downloaded from Debian
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 11:04:49PM -0300, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
> So, i should to 2 upgrades: one to Debian 10, and one more to Debian 11.
> Fine. And for each one, the steps are:
> But after my first edition to sources.list, apt update fails. I have
> tried apt-get update to, but it also fails
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 13:50:19 +0200
"Daniel M." wrote:
> To my understanding, unstable has 91.0.1-1 and experimental has
> 91.0.1-2 as seen in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox.
>
Or you can download v92.0.b9 from
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/developer/
The button links to:
I have compared my previous install nft ruleset and installed packages list
with the current install and found that firewalld wasn't installed in the
working system but ufw was. The nft ruleset was nearly identical save for the
missing firewalld rules.
And so after purging firewalld,
Greg Wooledge [2021-09-04 11:35:25] wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 04:49:24PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
>> # file /sbin/reboot
>> /sbin/reboot: POSIX shell script, ASCII text executable
>
> That's not normal for a bullseye system using systemd for init.
Indeed.
> I'm not sure what you did
On 9/3/21 7:42 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
OK, changed.
Your data format still has issues.
You seem to have got the old file again, check it out again,
because some of those issues have already been
mentioned/fixed:
https://dataswamp.org/~incal/ebchw/cpu.txt
On Sat, 04 Sep 2021 14:46:21 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-09-04 at 13:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 12:54:35PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >
> >> Greg Wooledge [2021-09-04 11:35:25] wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 04:49:24PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net
On 2021-09-04 at 13:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 12:54:35PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>> Greg Wooledge [2021-09-04 11:35:25] wrote:
>> > On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 04:49:24PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
>> >> # file /sbin/reboot
>> >> /sbin/reboot: POSIX shell script,
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 12:54:35PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Greg Wooledge [2021-09-04 11:35:25] wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 04:49:24PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> >> # file /sbin/reboot
> >> /sbin/reboot: POSIX shell script, ASCII text executable
> >
> > That's not normal for a
rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
> Top posting and not quoting anything as I'm coming from a different POV.
>
> If the OP needs firefox 91 (or whatever), there is another option, installing
> the package available from Mozilla as a separate executable.
Sure. I've had an issue with the Debian Buster's
Top posting and not quoting anything as I'm coming from a different POV.
If the OP needs firefox 91 (or whatever), there is another option, installing
the package available from Mozilla as a separate executable.
(Aside: I had to do that (for an earlier version of Firefox) because a website
SOLVED
/usr/share/open-infrastructure/container/shutdown.txt
is from package progress-linux-container:
Progress Linux is a Debian derivative distribution focused on system
integration.
This package is a metapackage to be installed in a container
(systemd-nspawn).
# apt remove
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 04:49:24PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 16:42:45 +0300
> Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 02:40:13PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> > > Suddenly I can no longer reboot or poweroff my up-to-date
> > > bullseye system:
> >
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 04:49:24PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 16:42:45 +0300
> Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 02:40:13PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> > > Suddenly I can no longer reboot or poweroff my up-to-date
> > > bullseye system:
> >
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 16:42:45 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
> /bin/systemd reboot
>
> And, what about these:
>
> ls -al /sbin/reboot
> file /sbin/reboot
>
> Reco
>
the commands poweroff and reboot are textfiles.
I have no idea
# mcedit /sbin/reboot:
#!/bin/sh
echo "${0}: disabled in
bonjour
pas chez moi (FFOX 78.13.0esr). Le site est accessible.
Le 04/09/2021 à 09:29, rok a écrit :
bonjour,
http://refpersys.org/
est une connexion non sécurisées et est bloquée par firefox;
amitiés,
--
Erwann
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 16:42:45 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 02:40:13PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> > Suddenly I can no longer reboot or poweroff my up-to-date
> > bullseye system:
> >
> > # reboot
> > /usr/sbin/reboot: disabled in systemd-nspawn container
>
>
Hi.
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 02:40:13PM +0200, sp...@caiway.net wrote:
> Suddenly I can no longer reboot or poweroff my up-to-date
> bullseye system:
>
> # reboot
> /usr/sbin/reboot: disabled in systemd-nspawn container
Unless I'm mistaken, these messages are not generated by systemd.
In
Marko Randjelovic writes:
> Your control 'Capture',0 is turned on and volume is at maximum, so
> that's fine, but you don't have 'input source' control. On my machine
> output of 'amixer -c0' gives among other controls the following:
>
> Simple mixer control 'Input Source',0
> Capabilities:
"Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
> Very new laptop? Does it need Intel firmware for the soundcard?
> firmware-intel-sound from non-free?
>
> https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/firmware-intel-sound
Thanks for the advice, Andy. I just tried it. But this did not work. I
even rebooted the system
> If you mean the line from that page "[2021-08-18] Accepted firefox
> 91.0.1-1 (source) into unstable (Mike Hommey)", that doesn't mean binary
> packages are available as you've noticed.
Okay, that explains it. In fact, i was referring to the versions table
in the left column.
> I don't actually
"Daniel M." writes:
> The debian package tracker (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox)
> states that version 91.0.1-1 of firefox should be available, but I can
> in no way install it.
If you mean the line from that page "[2021-08-18] Accepted firefox
91.0.1-1 (source) into unstable (Mike
Hi,
Suddenly I can no longer reboot or poweroff my up-to-date
bullseye system:
# reboot
/usr/sbin/reboot: disabled in systemd-nspawn container
Linux container share the kernel of the host system they are running on,
there is no need to reboot just the container.
However, please contact your
Le 04/09/2021 à 14:02, Jean-François Bachelet a écrit :
Hello ^^)
Le 04/09/2021 à 11:37, NoSpam a écrit :
Bonjour
Le 04/09/2021 à 03:44, Jean-François Bachelet a écrit :
Hello ^^)
en ce moment je suis floodé de mails 'dmark aggregate reports' de la
part de serveurs que j'ai pas
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 01:50:19PM +0200, Daniel M. wrote:
> To my understanding, unstable has 91.0.1-1 and experimental has
> 91.0.1-2 as seen in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox.
>
The buildd status page for the firefox package [0] shows that the
builders have the package in state
On Samstag, 4. September 2021 07:50:19 -04 Daniel M. wrote:
> To my understanding, unstable has 91.0.1-1 and experimental has
> 91.0.1-2 as seen in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox.
Unstable here still with 88.0.1-1 not 91...
same as OP
Have no time neither today nor tomorrow to look into
Le 04/09/2021 à 08:06, Basile Starynkevitch a écrit :
Bonjour la liste,
Sur un portable x86-64 mon /etc/apt/sources.list (édité maintes fois à
la main) contient actuellement
guiseppe# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ testing
main
To my understanding, unstable has 91.0.1-1 and experimental has
91.0.1-2 as seen in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox.
Hello ^^)
Le 04/09/2021 à 11:37, NoSpam a écrit :
Bonjour
Le 04/09/2021 à 03:44, Jean-François Bachelet a écrit :
Hello ^^)
en ce moment je suis floodé de mails 'dmark aggregate reports' de la
part de serveurs que j'ai pas contacté, pour un domaine (qui
m'appartient) mais qui n'envoie
On Sat, 04 Sep 2021 07:47:02 +0530
Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> Marko Randjelovic writes:
>
> > Did you make sure:
> >
> > 1. correct device is set to record from
> > 2. recording is enabled
> > 3. input volume is large enough
>
> I guess I have only one device so there is nothing to set.
I
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:52:45PM +0530, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> I have a fresh Bullseye installation on a laptop. Sound output is
> working. But the input is not working. The device is detected.
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> $ arecord -l
> List of
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:17:21AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 04:11:49PM +0200, Richard Forst wrote:
> > I just installed Debian using netinstall image. I thought I install testing
> > version, but apparently it's Debian 11. So now my source.list looks like
> >
Le sam. 4 sept. 2021 09:49, Basile Starynkevitch
a écrit :
>
> On 9/4/21 9:29 AM, rok wrote:
> > bonjour,
>
Bonjour
> >
> > http://refpersys.org/
> >
> > est une connexion non sécurisées et est bloquée par firefox;
>
>
> Qui peut m'expliquer l'intérêt de HTTPS (encrypté) par rapport à HTTP
>
On 4/09/21 9:26 pm, Brian wrote:
On Sat 04 Sep 2021 at 21:21:38 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
Greg Wooledge pointed out in another thread that 'type' is often better than
'which' for finding out what kind of command you're about to run, and where
it comes from.
A quick test, however, threw up
Bonjour
Le 04/09/2021 à 03:44, Jean-François Bachelet a écrit :
Hello ^^)
en ce moment je suis floodé de mails 'dmark aggregate reports' de la
part de serveurs que j'ai pas contacté, pour un domaine (qui
m'appartient) mais qui n'envoie pas de mails sauf si c'est moi qui le
fait... et le
On Sat 04 Sep 2021 at 21:21:38 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
> Greg Wooledge pointed out in another thread that 'type' is often better than
> 'which' for finding out what kind of command you're about to run, and where
> it comes from.
>
> A quick test, however, threw up another issue:
>
>
On 9/4/2021 11:21 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
Greg Wooledge pointed out in another thread that 'type' is often better
than 'which' for finding out what kind of command you're about to run,
and where it comes from.
A quick test, however, threw up another issue:
richard@zircon:~$ type ls
ls is
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 01:58:41AM -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, Michael Lange wrote:
>
> > according to https://ice-wm.org/man/icewm-preferences the syntax for
> > using a bold font should rather be:
>
> > ActiveTaskBarFontNameXft=”sans-serif:size=12:bold” .
>
> Ah. RTFM
On 1/09/21 3:32 am, Greg Wooledge wrote:
In bash, which is *not* a shell builtin -- it's a separate program,
/usr/bin/which.
Well _that_ took a while to parse correctly :-) I know bash is not a
shell builtin, that would be weird ...
Cheers,
Richard
Greg Wooledge pointed out in another thread that 'type' is often better
than 'which' for finding out what kind of command you're about to run,
and where it comes from.
A quick test, however, threw up another issue:
richard@zircon:~$ type ls
ls is aliased to `ls --color=auto'
Great, so it's
Pour les autres, voici mon /etc/apt/sources.list qui marche (en Île de
France à Bourg La Reine)
# fichier /etc/apt/sources.list sur guiseppe
deb http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ testing
main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/debian/
HEllo ^^)
Le 04/09/2021 à 09:32, l0f...@tuta.io a écrit :
Bonjour Jeff,
4 sept. 2021, 02:23 de jfbache...@free.fr:
Le 03/09/2021 à 16:10, Luc Novales a écrit :
Pourquoi penses tu que c’est une vieille lib ?
Parce ce que c'est que disent les auteurs du logiciel dans leur propre site, ce
On 9/4/21 9:29 AM, rok wrote:
bonjour,
http://refpersys.org/
est une connexion non sécurisées et est bloquée par firefox;
Qui peut m'expliquer l'intérêt de HTTPS (encrypté) par rapport à HTTP
(textuel) sur un site web en lecture seule?
De mon point de vue, encrypter le protocole dans
bonjour,
http://refpersys.org/
est une connexion non sécurisées et est bloquée par firefox;
Le 4/09/21 à 08:06, Basile Starynkevitch a écrit :
Bonjour la liste,
Sur un portable x86-64 mon /etc/apt/sources.list (édité maintes fois à
la main) contient actuellement
guiseppe# cat
Bonjour Jeff,
4 sept. 2021, 02:23 de jfbache...@free.fr:
> Le 03/09/2021 à 16:10, Luc Novales a écrit :
>
>> Pourquoi penses tu que c’est une vieille lib ?
>>
> Parce ce que c'est que disent les auteurs du logiciel dans leur propre site,
> ce que je cite dans mon mel en vient directement.
>
>
El 2021-09-04 a las 08:46 +0200, Camaleón escribió:
> El 2021-09-03 a las 17:00 -0300, Marcelo Eduardo Giordano escribió:
>
> > El 3/9/21 a las 03:28, Camaleón escribió:
> > > El 2021-09-02 a las 18:49 -0300, Marcelo Eduardo Giordano escribió:
> > >
> > > > Tengo Debian bullseye kde y he
J'ai testé depuis chez moi.
guiseppe# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ testing main contrib
non-free
cette ligne ne passe pas, ce qui est d'ailleurs bizarre puisque le
fichier InRelease existe.
Mais je pense qu'elle est redondante avec
El 2021-09-03 a las 17:00 -0300, Marcelo Eduardo Giordano escribió:
> El 3/9/21 a las 03:28, Camaleón escribió:
> > El 2021-09-02 a las 18:49 -0300, Marcelo Eduardo Giordano escribió:
> >
> > > Tengo Debian bullseye kde y he cambiado unas configuraciones de cups por
> > > lo
> > > cual me pidió
David Christensen wrote:
>> OK, changed.
>
> Your data format still has issues.
You seem to have got the old file again, check it out again,
because some of those issues have already been
mentioned/fixed:
https://dataswamp.org/~incal/ebchw/cpu.txt
--
underground experts united
Bonjour la liste,
Sur un portable x86-64 mon /etc/apt/sources.list (édité maintes fois à
la main) contient actuellement
guiseppe# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ testing
main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.proxad.net/debian/ testing
54 matches
Mail list logo
