Re: printer

2000-03-21 Thread Michael Bonetsmueller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sandy Shapiro) writes:

 I have a HP LaserJet 1100. What are the steps  for installing it or
 getting it to work?

1) install package doc-linux-text.
2) read /usr/share/doc/Printing-HOWTO.gz.
3) ask again if you have more questions.

I recommend apsfilter as a filtering package. 

-- 
Michael Bonetsmüller   The least we can do is wave to each other
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  --Van der Graaf Generator


how to block access to ppp?

2000-03-12 Thread Michael Bonetsmueller

I want to temporary block access to pppd. I want to allow my users
only to use ppp at a predefined time, say 1200-1300. 

I have a mechanism like /etc/porttime in mind. My experiments with
ppp-pam and pam_time.so bore no fruit. I have masqdialer installed,
too. Any ideas?

-- 
Michael Bonetsmüller   The least we can do is wave to each other
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  --Van der Graaf Generator


Re: Hardware woes/make-kpkg

1999-03-18 Thread Michael Bonetsmueller

ahem. mea culpa. I overlooked kernel-package and now everything is up
and running, including the 'mca_' problem. Thanks to Laurent and Wayne
for your help!

Michael.

-- 
Michael Bonetsmüller   The least we can do is wave to each other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --Van der Graaf Generator


Hardware woes/make-kpkg

1999-03-16 Thread Michael Bonetsmueller

I can't find make-kpkg (neither locate nor dpkg -S finds anything),
and so I compiled the kernel using the 
make config zImage modules modules_install zlilo 
routine.

Now I get unresolved symbols when loading the 3c509.o module. All of
the symbols start with 'mca_' which sounds like a micro channel
problem! 

But I don't have and want micro channel. Can anybody tell me what I'm
missing here?

Where can I find make-kpkg?

TIA!

-- 
Michael Bonetsmüller   The least we can do is wave to each other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --Van der Graaf Generator


Re: what's the best html wordprocessor?

1999-03-11 Thread Michael Bonetsmueller
Paul Puri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I've used netscape composer, amaya, emacs (which is more of an html 
 code editor), I'm looking for wysiwyg (word processor type).
 
 Now I think soffice's StarWriter is the best around.  It acts just 
 like a word processor, it has footnotes, doublespace, etc.  It also 
 uses good html.  I checked my docs in lynx and they were quite 
 viewable, and the double spacing etc looked great.
 
 I'm interested in this because my goal is to write all documents in an 
 open file type that can be easily indexed and searchable in htdig.  
 That way I can have a permanent and growing personal (searchable) 
 library (one that would also be searchable over the network).  
 
 I know there are lots of great word processors, but .wpd, .doc, .dvi, 
 etc. are not acceptable.  I hear gnome will have an xml word 
 processor, that is something to look forward to.

I find the idea to use HTML as an exchangeable format for documents
REALLY scary, because it doesn't use content based tagging and the
documents look different on each browser. You can't carefully design a
document and be sure that it will look the same even with a new
browser version. For searching, HTDIG and the like, HTML is great,
however.

My suggestion is to keep 2 copies of a document around: one in a
format that ideally uses content tagging and can reproduce faithful
copies for printing (dvi, I suppose) and a HTML copy for browsing,
indexing and the like.

I would try to learn SGML. From SGML you can create all types of
documents, including HTML. 

Even LaTeX is better, and Latex-documents usually are searchable,
too. Using the right style files, you can even have
content-tagging. LaTeX2HTML translates LaTeX into HTML.

The editor: I don't care. WYSIWYG doesn't bother me, because in LaTeX
I trust (after having made my own style files). Emacs+AucTeX+RefTeX is
my favourite combination, but vi would do the same job.



-- 
Michael Bonetsmüller   The least we can do is wave to each other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --Van der Graaf Generator


Re: Favorite WP/Office software...

1999-03-08 Thread Michael Bonetsmueller

Paul Nathan Puri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I'm curious what people feel is their favorite word processor/ office
 productivity suite (i.e., star office, word perfect, lyx, TeX, siag
 office, etc.).
 

EMACS + AucTeX + LaTeX. 

Only missing thing is a useable UNIX-native free spreadsheet. (I'm
running Linux on a 486 so SO is a clear no no for me. Besides, I think
that ports like WP and SO are a nice thing, but not the Final
Solution. They necessarily have a very un-UNIX-y touch-and-feel. Why
escape from Windows to use SO, which tries very hard to look like the
Big Stinker?

Michael.

-- 
Michael Bonetsmüller   The least we can do is wave to each other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --Van der Graaf Generator