On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:07:41 +0800
Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar umarz...@gmail.com wrote:
i had enabled lenny-backports but aptitude -t lenny-backports install
iceweasel installs Iceweasel 3.0.6
There isn't an iceweasel package in Backports, so you're stuck with
the one in Lenny... unless you
2010/1/23 Graham savagebiscu...@googlemail.com
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:07:41 +0800
Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar umarz...@gmail.com wrote:
i had enabled lenny-backports but aptitude -t lenny-backports install
iceweasel installs Iceweasel 3.0.6
There isn't an iceweasel package in Backports,
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:13:26 +0800
Umarzuki Mochlis umarz...@gmail.com wrote:
my mistake, the package is for amd64 and powerpc
http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=lenny-backportssearchon=nameskeywords=iceweasel
No, it's my mistake. I didn't properly check with the Debian packages
page
i had enabled lenny-backports but aptitude -t lenny-backports install
iceweasel installs Iceweasel 3.0.6
my /etc/apt/sources.list as below
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian lenny main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main
deb
Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar wrote:
i had enabled lenny-backports but aptitude -t lenny-backports install
iceweasel installs Iceweasel 3.0.6
my /etc/apt/sources.list as below
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian lenny main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main
deb
Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar wrote:
i had enabled lenny-backports but aptitude -t lenny-backports install
iceweasel installs Iceweasel 3.0.6
my /etc/apt/sources.list as below
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian lenny main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main
deb
On 2010-01-23 04:07 +0100, Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar wrote:
i had enabled lenny-backports but aptitude -t lenny-backports install
iceweasel installs Iceweasel 3.0.6
Since the backport is brand new, it simply might not be available for
your architecture yet. What does apt-cache policy
2010/1/23 Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de
On 2010-01-23 04:07 +0100, Umarzuki Bin Mochlis Moktar wrote:
i had enabled lenny-backports but aptitude -t lenny-backports install
iceweasel installs Iceweasel 3.0.6
Since the backport is brand new, it simply might not be available for
your
2010/1/23 Wayne linux...@gmail.com linux...@gmail.com
[...]
aptitude install iceweasel=(version you want)
get the full version by doing
aptitude show iceweasel
# aptitude show iceweasel
Package: iceweasel
State: not installed
Version: 3.0.6-3
Priority: optional
Section: web
Maintainer:
make it like this:
settings - apps - mailto - /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mutt
But this won't work in Lenny... mutt 1.5.18-6 does not seem to include that
file.
You are right, it's only included in unstable mutt (1.5.20-2), but the
OP wrote that he works with iceweasel 3.5 which
), but the
OP wrote that he works with iceweasel 3.5 which is in experimental. So
I thought a solution for unstable is ok.
Indeed. I suppose there are many people here who run Lenny and use mutt and
iceweasel; that note was for their benefit so they need not look for a file
which does not exist (like I
* green [090909 07:51 -0500]
Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-09 01:10 -0500:
* green greenfreedo...@gmail.com 09.09.2009
Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-08 15:11 -0500:
* Michael Wagner michaeldeb...@web.de 08.09.2009
* Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de 04.09.2009
I've
also sprach Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de [2009.09.09.1918 +0200]:
This is somewhat overscripted from madduck ;-) The faxt is, that my
mutt (hg version from Mutt 1.5.20+lxtecppc (2009-08-04) doesn't
interpret neither $@ nor $[0-9]. I'll get over to mutt-dev with
this.
I don't
* martin f krafft [090909 20:29 +0200]
also sprach Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de [2009.09.09.1918 +0200]:
This is somewhat overscripted from madduck ;-) The faxt is, that my
mutt (hg version from Mutt 1.5.20+lxtecppc (2009-08-04) doesn't
interpret neither $@ nor $[0-9]. I'll get over
also sprach Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de [2009.09.09.2249 +0200]:
I don't understand. mutt has no business with $@ or $[0-9], but
I think you are probably hit by #545876. Does the patch fix it for
you?
No.
I'll need more information then. Maybe you can isolate the entire
argument
* Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de 04.09.2009
I've tried settings - apps - mailto - shellscript
Shellscript:
#!/bin/sh
exec xterm -e mutt $@
The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
Any hints?
Hello Elimar,
in the mutt package is the shellscript /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mutt, which
is
* Michael Wagner michaeldeb...@web.de 08.09.2009
* Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de 04.09.2009
I've tried settings - apps - mailto - shellscript
Apart from my other message you can also make it like this:
settings - apps - mailto - /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mutt
Hth Michael
--
Every
Michael Wagner wrote at 2009-09-08 15:11 -0500:
* Michael Wagner michaeldeb...@web.de 08.09.2009
* Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de 04.09.2009
I've tried settings - apps - mailto - shellscript
Apart from my other message you can also make it like this:
settings - apps - mailto -
* s. keeling [090907 02:14 +]
Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de:
I've tried settings - apps - mailto - shellscript
Shellscript:
#!/bin/sh
exec xterm -e mutt $@
The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
Any hints?
Ben at linuxgazette.net and I've been playing
Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de:
I've tried settings - apps - mailto - shellscript
Shellscript:
#!/bin/sh
exec xterm -e mutt $@
The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
Any hints?
Ben at linuxgazette.net and I've been playing with this for years (I
haven't used it in a while;
I've tried settings - apps - mailto - shellscript
Shellscript:
#!/bin/sh
exec xterm -e mutt $@
The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
Any hints?
Thanks
Elimar
--
It's a good thing we don't get all
the government we pay for.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
I've tried settings - apps - mailto - shellscript
Shellscript:
#!/bin/sh
exec xterm -e mutt $@
I'm guessing mutt can't parse the mailto: line given out by iceweasel.
Here's a very quick and very dirty bit of perl I knocked up; I'm not
suggesting it's right, but
I've tried settings - apps - mailto - shellscript
Shellscript:
#!/bin/sh
exec xterm -e mutt $@
The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
That's very close to the script that is working for me (using
Iceweasel 3.0.6 on Lenny):
#!/bin/sh
prefixWords=
if [ -t 0 -a -t
* Clive Standbridge [090904 16:47 +0100]
I've tried settings - apps - mailto - shellscript
Shellscript:
#!/bin/sh
exec xterm -e mutt $@
The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
That's very close to the script that is working for me (using
Iceweasel 3.0.6 on Lenny):
[...]
exec
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 03:00:13PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
I've tried settings - apps - mailto - shellscript
Shellscript:
#!/bin/sh
exec xterm -e mutt $@
The xterm only pops up for 1 second.
I use following in lenny and works fine:
--
#!/bin/sh
gnome-terminal -e mutt $@
--
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:48:28AM -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:37:30 +1200, Chris Bannister in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:44:47PM -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[snip]
So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#using
Doesn't document volatile. Mentions security but doesn't really document it
fully, even through the links provided. (In particular, I couldn't find
what to add you
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:37:30 +1200, Chris Bannister in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:44:47PM -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[snip]
So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ?
http://glandium.org/blog/?p=391
Thanks for your hard work.
--
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:35:56 -0400, Celejar in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:16:15 -0400
S. Fishpaste s...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid wrote:
...
I agree Ron, that T-Bird and to some extent Slypheed-Claws, are good
examples of GUI e-mail clients that are
In 20090816201911.gb4...@think.homelan, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed,12.Aug.09, 22:31:25, Tim Beauregard wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Volatile is for software that fails to achieve its goal if it is not
updated
[snip]
the contents of this post would make a good FAQ.
On Wed,12.Aug.09, 19:35:21, S. Fishpaste wrote:
I used XFce back in the day, now it seems bloated and slow on this P3. I've
also heard it has a nasty memory leak;
That has been fixed AFAICT. I also installed Xfce 4.4 on my mothers
laptop (p...@1.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM) and it is quite ok.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:44:47PM -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
Hello; First of all I'm not that familiar with a Linux GUI as I usually run
GNU/Linux headless via CLI.
I've got Lenny running Xserver-Xorg and I've noticed that the default
Iceweasel aka Firefox is an older version and I prefer
On Wed,12.Aug.09, 22:31:25, Tim Beauregard wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Volatile is for software that fails to achieve its goal if it is not
updated
[snip]
the contents of this post would make a good FAQ.
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#using
Regards,
Andrei
--
If
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:16:15 -0400
S. Fishpaste s...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid wrote:
...
I agree Ron, that T-Bird and to some extent Slypheed-Claws, are good
examples of GUI e-mail clients that are probably best of breed. I left
And what, exactly, is wrong with plain Sylph? :/
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:41:33 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-13 17:22:14 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
Wow talk about copious output, only 4002 lines.
4002 is not very much, in particular for a complex application such as
Firefox. This means that Firefox has
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:03:16 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-13 19:44, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[snip]
Yeah I have the preview pane set up similarly. You're quite right about
being able to delete threads or mark them read, as being sweet.
Tbird/IW has Mark
On 2009-08-14 10:16, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[snip]
It's been awhile since I have used T-Bird, but it's a great client. I'm not
saying mutt is any better, just that for _me_ since using mutt, I haven't
cared for any other e-mail client. I've tried, but keeping coming back. 8-D
And, of course,
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:18:09 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-14 10:16, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[snip]
It's been awhile since I have used T-Bird, but it's a great client. I'm not
saying mutt is any better, just that for _me_ since using mutt, I haven't
cared for
On 2009-08-14 14:22, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:18:09 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-14 10:16, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[snip]
It's been awhile since I have used T-Bird, but it's a great client. I'm not
saying mutt is any better, just that for _me_
Once I got used to mutt; I found it hard to adjust to any other
e-mail client. The power and flexibility is intoxicating. 8-D
I've always rather thought that might be the case. A sense of empowerment is
always welcome.
Thanks for the suggestion. Open an Xterm window and all will be revealed.
On 2009-08-12 22:52:14 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:21:00 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
Also, check that you don't have a firefox already running (maybe
hidden), otherwise when you run a second instance, it will send a
message to the old one
S. Fishpaste wrote:
Hm sounds like a plan. Do you know offhand which Debian distro has 3.5.x ?
Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using
these repos if you want.
deb ftp://ftp.mepis.com/mepis/ mepis-8.0 main
--
Jimmy Johnson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using
these repos if you want.
deb ftp://ftp.mepis.com/mepis/ mepis-8.0 main
Hiya
If you going to make a suggestion for a debian based distro, then you
might as well just make it Ubuntu.
Nothing wrong
On Thursday 13 August 2009 04:28:56 pm Brent Clark wrote:
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using
these repos if you want.
deb ftp://ftp.mepis.com/mepis/ mepis-8.0 main
Hiya
If you going to make a suggestion for a debian based
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:45:03 -0700, Jimmy Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
S. Fishpaste wrote:
Hm sounds like a plan. Do you know offhand which Debian distro has 3.5.x ?
Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using
these repos if you want.
deb
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:32:40 -0400, Charlie Kroeger in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
For e-mail; mutt is my preferred MUA.
Now there's a thread.
Know of any clearly written logical progressive steps for setting up mutt or
is it a life's work? Does it require an excessively high IQ fish?
I
Brent Clark wrote:
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using
these repos if you want.
deb ftp://ftp.mepis.com/mepis/ mepis-8.0 main
If you going to make a suggestion for a debian based distro, then you
might as well just make it Ubuntu.
S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:45:03 -0700, Jimmy Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
S. Fishpaste wrote:
Hm sounds like a plan. Do you know offhand which Debian distro has 3.5.x ?
Mepis 8.0 is based on Lenny and has 3.5 compiled, you can get it using
these repos if you
* S. Fishpaste s...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid [2009 Aug 13 11:13
-0500]:
Then when I ran into further questions, mutt-us...@mutt.org was always
helpful. Once I got used to mutt; I found it hard to adjust to any other
e-mail client. The power and flexibility is intoxicating. 8-D
That
On 2009-08-13 16:38, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* S. Fishpaste s...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid [2009 Aug 13 11:13
-0500]:
Then when I ran into further questions, mutt-us...@mutt.org was always
helpful. Once I got used to mutt; I found it hard to adjust to any other
e-mail client. The power
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:41:35 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-12 22:52:14 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:21:00 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
Also, check that you don't have a firefox already running (maybe
On 2009-08-13 17:22:14 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
Wow talk about copious output, only 4002 lines.
4002 is not very much, in particular for a complex application such as
Firefox. This means that Firefox has done almost nothing and a problem
occurred very early.
I have no idea what it all means.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:38:31 -0500, Nate Bargmann in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
* S. Fishpaste s...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid [2009 Aug 13 11:13
-0500]:
Then when I ran into further questions, mutt-us...@mutt.org was always
helpful. Once I got used to mutt; I found it hard to
On 2009-08-13 19:44, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[snip]
Yeah I have the preview pane set up similarly. You're quite right about
being able to delete threads or mark them read, as being sweet.
Tbird/IW has Mark Thread As Read.
The threading is what's the bees knees for me.
What do you mean? How
/experimental
apps you want in a more sandboxed environment.
As I understand it, I think that should be enough for your need. Later,
when a proper backport of iceweasel 3.5 arrives, you can use it under
stable.
I have successfully used this method when I wanted to install stuff form
experimental
On 2009-08-11 23:19:37 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Use the rmadison command
The rmadison command isn't reliable. For instance:
$ rmadison subversion
subversion | 1.4.2dfsg1-2 | etch-m68k | source, m68k
subversion | 1.4.2dfsg1-2 | oldstable | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa,
On 2009-08-12 10:35:07 +0200, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ?
If I were you, I would temporarily enable testing, unstable and
experimental repos, grab iceweasel and dependencies from experimental
and then disabling the repos.
Hm
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:26:47 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-12 10:35:07 +0200, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ?
If I were you, I would temporarily enable testing, unstable and
experimental repos,
with stable for almost all apps,
and installing a chroot environment to run the few unstable/experimental
apps you want in a more sandboxed environment.
As I understand it, I think that should be enough for your need. Later,
when a proper backport of iceweasel 3.5 arrives, you can use it under
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:52:27 -0400, Charlie Kroeger in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ?
You could put these sources in your /etc/apt/sources.list and do an #apt-get
update
deb http://ftp.tiscali.nl/debian/ sid main
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:22:16 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-11 22:04, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:24:44 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[ ...]
I have checked backports for
On 2009-08-12 13:23:08 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
That's the problem I'm running into Vincent; XUL libs with the
binary I downloaded from Mozilla.org
Do you have a $LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
--
Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.org - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog:
In slrnh85u4r.531@laptop.sweetpig.dyndns.org, S. Fishpaste wrote:
Well I was primarily wanting to stay with stable as this is an older
laptop and other than wanting an uptodate browser *always* I'd prefer to
use backports. Wonder why either backports or volatile don't carry the
latest
S. Fishpaste writes:
Speaking of Volatile isn't this the purpose of it; For packages like
web browsers which are updated frequently ?
No. It is for packages such as antivirus programs that must be updated
frequently to be useful. Upstream hyperactivity does not justify
putting a package in
|Firefox. I thought that was the purpose of those 2
sources.
Somebody has to provide them first. As a general rule, backports are
only made for packages that are in testing, and Iceweasel 3.5 has not
even hit unstable yet.
Given that the maintainers of Mozilla packages in Debian are totally
On 2009-08-12 12:27, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:22:16 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-11 22:04, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:24:44 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:27:05 -0400
S. Fishpaste s...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid wrote:
Yup that was what I was doing to get the error message initially;
:~/firefox-3.5.2$ ./firefox-bin
./firefox-bin: error while loading shared libraries:
libxul.so: cannot open shared
On 2009-08-12 15:11, Graham wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:27:05 -0400
S. Fishpaste s...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid wrote:
Yup that was what I was doing to get the error message initially;
:~/firefox-3.5.2$ ./firefox-bin
./firefox-bin: error while loading shared
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:45:46 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
--nextPart1623703.JhhgrbnWO2
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
In slrnh85u4r.531@laptop.sweetpig.dyndns.org,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:39:51 -0500, John Hasler in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
S. Fishpaste writes:
Speaking of Volatile isn't this the purpose of it; For packages like
web browsers which are updated frequently ?
No. It is for packages such as antivirus programs that must be updated
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:23 PM, S.
Fishpastes...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:26:47 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
On 2009-08-12 10:35:07 +0200, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on
. Wonder why either backports or volatile don't carry the latest
versions of Iceweasel|Firefox. I thought that was the purpose of those 2
sources.
Somebody has to provide them first. As a general rule, backports are
only made for packages that are in testing, and Iceweasel 3.5 has not
even hit
In slrnh8683n.531@laptop.sweetpig.dyndns.org, S. Fishpaste wrote:
In a normal laptop/workstation GUI environment few applications are as
important as a web browser (especially these days). A web worker for
example relies on a web browser pretty heavily. Not everyone using Debian
is using it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Volatile is for software that fails to achieve its goal if it is not updated
[snip]
the contents of this post would make a good FAQ.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Well I was primarily wanting to stay with stable as this is an older laptop
Hummm..well you could try Opera. They have a lighter faster up-to-scratch
browser.
Put this in your sources.list:
deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ sid non-free
#apt-get update
#apt-get install opera
Can't hurt. If
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:53:56 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-12 12:27, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[ ...]
Yeah I know, nevertheless that's the error message.
What *exactly* is the error message? Run it from an xterm (AFTER
having removed Lenny's iceweasel and
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:11:09 +0100, Graham in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:27:05 -0400
S. Fishpaste s...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid wrote:
Yup that was what I was doing to get the error message initially;
:~/firefox-3.5.2$ ./firefox-bin
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:31:25 +0100, Tim Beauregard in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Volatile is for software that fails to achieve its goal if it is not updated
[snip]
the contents of this post would make a good FAQ.
Indeed it would. Is there a cite for it
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:30:47 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
--nextPart4349252.rWh3h2apeg
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
In slrnh8683n.531@laptop.sweetpig.dyndns.org,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:57:19 -0300, Cassiano Leal in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:23 PM, S.
Fishpastes...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid wrote:
[ ...]
I just got Google Chrome going -- OK can't use Flash yet, but at least it's
pretty fast on this old laptop;
On 2009-08-12 19:39:10 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:11:09 +0100, Graham in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:27:05 -0400
S. Fishpaste s...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid wrote:
Yup that was what I was doing to get the error message initially;
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:39:10 -0400
S. Fishpaste s...@deer-in-the-headlights.ca.invalid wrote:
You're not meant to run ./firefox-bin, you're meant to run ./firefox
Try that and it should work.
Really ?!
I had tried that; didn't seem to do anything just exited without
echoing any error
In slrnh86lad.531@laptop.sweetpig.dyndns.org, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:31:25 +0100, Tim Beauregard in
gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Volatile is for software that fails to achieve its goal if it is not
updated
the contents of this post would
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:49:07 -0400, Charlie Kroeger in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
Well I was primarily wanting to stay with stable as this is an older laptop
Hummm..well you could try Opera. They have a lighter faster up-to-scratch
browser.
LOL Geez browser choice is almost religous
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:21:00 +0200, Vincent Lefevre in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-12 19:39:10 -0400, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:11:09 +0100, Graham in gmane.linux.debian.user wrote:
[ ...]
You're not meant to run ./firefox-bin, you're meant to run ./firefox
For e-mail; mutt is my preferred MUA.
Now there's a thread.
Know of any clearly written logical progressive steps for setting up mutt or
is it a life's work? Does it require an excessively high IQ fish?
--
CK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hello; First of all I'm not that familiar with a Linux GUI as I usually run
GNU/Linux headless via CLI.
I've got Lenny running Xserver-Xorg and I've noticed that the default
Iceweasel aka Firefox is an older version and I prefer to run the latest.
I have checked backports for stable and there
On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote:
Hello; First of all I'm not that familiar with a Linux GUI as I usually run
GNU/Linux headless via CLI.
I've got Lenny running Xserver-Xorg and I've noticed that the default
Iceweasel aka Firefox is an older version and I prefer to run the latest.
I
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Ron Johnsonron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote:
Hello; First of all I'm not that familiar with a Linux GUI as I usually
run
GNU/Linux headless via CLI.
I've got Lenny running Xserver-Xorg and I've noticed that the default
So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ?
You could put these sources in your /etc/apt/sources.list and do an #apt-get
update
deb http://ftp.tiscali.nl/debian/ sid main contrib non-free
If you have a GUI type package manager like smartpm it will show a list of all
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:17:14 -0300, Cassiano Leal in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Ron Johnsonron.l.john...@cox.net wrote:
That doesn't sound right. The Mozilla binary should come with the proper
XUL.
I agree. AFAIK, the Mozilla binary is completely
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:24:44 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[ ...]
I have checked backports for stable and there doesn't appear to be a 3.5
version, so I got Mozilla's version. Only problem it depends on XUL* which
wasn't
S. Fishpaste wrote:
If I were you, I would temporarily enable testing, unstable and
experimental repos, grab iceweasel and dependencies from experimental
and then disabling the repos.
Hm sounds like a plan. Do you know offhand which Debian distro has 3.5.x ?
Use the rmadison command
On 2009-08-11 22:04, S. Fishpaste wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:24:44 -0500, Ron Johnson in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
On 2009-08-11 16:44, S. Fishpaste wrote:
[ ...]
I have checked backports for stable and there doesn't appear to be a 3.5
version, so I got Mozilla's version. Only
Charlie Kroeger wrote:
So how does one use the latest version of this web browser on Stable ?
You could put these sources in your /etc/apt/sources.list and do an #apt-get
update
deb http://ftp.tiscali.nl/debian/ sid main contrib non-free
If you have a GUI type package manager
Soren Orel wrote:
When will Iceweasel 3.5 come to Debian Lenny? :P
A Lenny backport is a step closer, as it was just uploaded to experimental:
http://glandium.org/blog/?p=391
- Chris B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Chris Burkhardt wrote:
Soren Orel wrote:
When will Iceweasel 3.5 come to Debian Lenny? :P
A Lenny backport is a step closer, as it was just uploaded to experimental:
http://glandium.org/blog/?p=391
And even better, Mike Hommey just posted step-by-step instructions on installing
Iceweasel
By the way, how could I update Iceweasel browser in order to always run a
safer version in my machine ?
Is it through apt-get update ?
Thanks
2009/7/1 Soren Orel soren.o...@gmail.com
When will Iceweasel 3.5 come to Debian Lenny? :P
I hope this bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duque Gorlois wrote:
By the way, how could I update Iceweasel browser in order to always
run a safer version in my machine ?
Is it through apt-get update ?
Yes. The stable version of iceweasel gets security updates from debian's
security team.
Thanks a lot Johannes !
2009/7/2 Johannes Wiedersich johan...@physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duque Gorlois wrote:
By the way, how could I update Iceweasel browser in order to always
run a safer version in my machine ?
Is it through apt-get
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
