Thank you All,
For your valuable feedbacks, I will test GNOME-3 again w/o animations as
suggested, while I am on MATE for the time being.
Using X with EXA acceleration for TRIDENT video chip has problems
updating display occasionally, trailing some garbage on the screen, it
looks as if it could
On 2016-05-16, Tomas Kral wrote:
> Dear Pete and All,
>
> I also use LXDE on RPI, that is our second machine in the household.
>
> I quite like GNOME for its appearance ala MacOS, and the new version of
> GNOME has got many new great ideas, it looks awesome, though it does
On 05/16/2016 09:42 AM, Michael Milliman wrote:
On 05/16/2016 09:12 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
"Jessie" is not generally very responsive compared to "Wheezy", display
update and mouse tracking is very very slow.
Could it be that your wheezy install did not use Gnome-3 and that you're
now
On 05/16/2016 09:12 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
"Jessie" is not generally very responsive compared to "Wheezy", display
update and mouse tracking is very very slow.
Could it be that your wheezy install did not use Gnome-3 and that you're
now using the standard Gnome-3 desktop (which presumes
> Yes "Wheezy" under GNOME-2, and "Jessie" under GNOME-3
Right. Gnome-3 requires decent 3D support.
> I see, it has to do with graphics after all. X.Org's XAA and EXA are 2D
> accelerators, right?
That's right.
> My PC mainboard manual states it has got on-chip AGP 2D/3D.
I don't think X.org
Dear Stefan,
Yes "Wheezy" under GNOME-2, and "Jessie" under GNOME-3
I see, it has to do with graphics after all. X.Org's XAA and EXA are 2D
accelerators, right?
My PC mainboard manual states it has got on-chip AGP 2D/3D.
"Wheezy" performs well with XAA, that is not maintained upstream any
Dear Pete and All,
I also use LXDE on RPI, that is our second machine in the household.
I quite like GNOME for its appearance ala MacOS, and the new version of
GNOME has got many new great ideas, it looks awesome, though it does not
perform very well on my older PC platform.
I also tried X with
> "Jessie" is not generally very responsive compared to "Wheezy", display
> update and mouse tracking is very very slow.
Could it be that your wheezy install did not use Gnome-3 and that you're
now using the standard Gnome-3 desktop (which presumes existence of 3D
GPU acceleration) on a system
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Tomas Kral wrote:
> Dear Users,
>
> I have finally installed "Jessie" in a separate partition of the machine
> where I also run "Wheezy" for past few years.
>
> I use GNOME desktops.
Hi Tomas,
Is GNOME a requirement? If not, perhaps take
Dear Users,
I have finally installed "Jessie" in a separate partition of the machine
where I also run "Wheezy" for past few years.
I use GNOME desktops.
"Jessie" is not generally very responsive compared to "Wheezy", display
update and mouse tracking is very very slow.
I have to admit that my
Dear Users,
I have finally installed "Jessie" in a separate partition of the machine
where I also run "Wheezy" for past few years.
I use GNOME desktops.
"Jessie" is not generally very responsive compared to "Wheezy", display
update and mouse tracking is very very slow.
I have to admit that my
11 matches
Mail list logo