Re: Kleopatra / gpgconf

2017-12-22 Thread Alberto Luaces
Hans writes: > Now I know, who is to blame. :) However, so I hope, that this bugreport will > reach the correct maintainer. IMHO in this case, the reason for the bug is > clear, but as there are dependencies with kleopatra, libgpgme and gpgconf, > those who better know as me, will see, what

Re: Kleopatra / gpgconf

2017-12-22 Thread Hans
Am Freitag, 22. Dezember 2017, 09:44:18 CET schrieb Alberto Luaces: Yes you are correct. Just forgot about this bugreport. Now I know, who is to blame. :) However, so I hope, that this bugreport will reach the correct maintainer. IMHO in this case, the reason for the bug is clear, but as there

Re: Kleopatra / gpgconf

2017-12-22 Thread Alberto Luaces
Hans writes: > It is not clear for me, who is to blame now? My bad English... I mean, who > should be filed a bug. Huh... didn't you file the bug already? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883328 -- Alberto

Kleopatra / gpgconf

2017-12-22 Thread Hans
Hi dear list, it looks like "kleopatra" is mourning about gpgconf. During the start of kleopatra, gpgconf is checked and the check fails. So, kleopatra is not usable. Further investigations tell, that gpgconf is not compiled with a needed feature of libgpme. It is not clear f