On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:15:46 -0600
Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mike,
Another option would be to put the image on the web somewhere, and
post a link to it in the relevant query message.
That's one way of receiving such information separately off list.
Yes, indeed it is. I
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:59:50PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:15:46 -0600
Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mike,
Another option would be to put the image on the web somewhere, and
post a link to it in the relevant query message.
That's one way of
Douglas Tutty wrote:
..
Since the spam doesn't seem to be targeted specifically to *N*X system
users, it may be safe to think that their targeted audience mostly is
running *doze. Sind *doze people can't handle .ps files easily there's
less incentive for the spammers to send .ps files.
So the
Douglas Tutty wrote:
Since the spam doesn't seem to be targeted specifically to *N*X system
users, it may be safe to think that their targeted audience mostly is
running *doze. Sind *doze people can't handle .ps files easily there's
less incentive for the spammers to send .ps files.
So
Andrew Sackville-West writes:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 01:05:39PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
The other thing I've noticed is that a new spam will have a subject
starting with Re: . Could not the list filter verify that the subject
Re'd actually exists in the list archive within a set time
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:06:54PM +, Gary Roach wrote:
Check out a couple of not so on topic entries.
Please refrain from replying to spams on-list, and
especially quoting context from them. This only serves to
make statistical-classification filters less reliable.
--
Jon Dowland
--
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:32:01AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:06:54PM +, Gary Roach wrote:
Check out a couple of not so on topic entries.
It seems to me that much of this spam includes graphic images
(presumably that contain ads but I don't open them). Could
On Thursday 04 January 2007 11:30, Douglas Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:32:01AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:06:54PM +, Gary Roach wrote:
Check out a couple of not so on topic entries.
It seems to me that much of this spam includes graphic images
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:09:19PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
On Thursday 04 January 2007 11:30, Douglas Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:32:01AM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:06:54PM +, Gary Roach wrote:
Check out a couple of not so on topic
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 01:05:39PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
The other thing I've noticed is that a new spam will have a subject
starting with Re: . Could not the list filter verify that the subject
Re'd actually exists in the list archive within a set time frame (30
days?).
but then
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 01:05:39PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
The other thing I've noticed is that a new spam will have a subject
starting with Re: . Could not the list filter verify that the subject
Re'd actually exists in the list archive within a set time
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:16:11AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 01:05:39PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
The other thing I've noticed is that a new spam will have a subject
starting with Re: . Could not the list filter verify that the subject
Re'd actually
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
That is not a solution. Spammers can always use .ps files to send their spam.
Besides not every email containing a graphic image is spam. For example, one
might be attaching a .jpg screenshot with a font problem he is having on his
computer.
Respectfully, I would
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:25:34 -0600
Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mike,
Respectfully, I would very much prefer not to see images posted to the
list, under any circumstances. If there is a problem such as you
mentioned, then those who wish to respond to the issue should receive
Brad Rogers wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:25:34 -0600
Mike McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mike,
Respectfully, I would very much prefer not to see images posted to the
list, under any circumstances. If there is a problem such as you
mentioned, then those who wish to respond to the
Check out a couple of not so on topic entries.
exacting Schooolgirls doinng splendiferous suckiing. susan 12/30/2006
2:00PM
and
YOUR INHERITANCE FUNDS OF $15.5MMike Dana Will 01/02/2007 4:30AM
Im not exactly a prude but it does clutter up the group. The advertising
just
Exactly right. I never thought I'd get this sort of thing in a Linux group!
--Steve Mazurek
On 1/3/07, Gary Roach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out a couple of not so on topic entries.
exacting Schooolgirls doinng splendiferous suckiing. susan 12/30/2006
2:00PM
and
YOUR INHERITANCE
17 matches
Mail list logo
