On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:05:31 +, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2011-09-05, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
The problem with clinging to GNOME2 is that the GNOME project will no
longer develop it, so unless someone forks the whole kit and caboodle,
it will eventually die off.
Yep, but
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:20:08 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
(...)
I am so happy with LXDE that I wish I had switched sooner, but until
Fedora 15 came out I had been contented and familiar enough with
GNOME2 not to make the effort to evaluate alternatives.
All this is my personal experience,
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 19:07 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-09-04 18:32 +0200, Chir0n wrote:
Hi all,
after an aptitude dist-upgrade to testing (and to unstable too) some GTK2
applications look ugly, like GTK1 appplications.
Gnome-terminal and Epiphany are two of them.
So is
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 20:25:03 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:19:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Does anyone know how to solve this?
I guess this is something related to the migration to GTK3 and GNOME3.
I'd say we have to be patient.
Well, I don't wish to be patient.
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:57:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
I neither like gnome-shell in its current state (I tested GNOME 3.0 in
openSUSE and did not feel good with it), but I hope it changes a lot
when wheezy comes out... and there is also the fallback mode.
The problem with fallback mode is that
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:46 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:57:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
I neither like gnome-shell in its current state (I tested GNOME 3.0 in
openSUSE and did not feel good with it), but I hope it changes a lot
when wheezy comes out... and there is also
On 2011-09-05, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:46 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:57:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
I neither like gnome-shell in its current state (I tested GNOME 3.0 in
openSUSE and did not feel good with it), but I hope it changes
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:32:27 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:46 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:57:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
I neither like gnome-shell in its current state (I tested GNOME 3.0 in
openSUSE and did not feel good with it), but I hope it
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:32:27 + (UTC)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:47:46 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:57:13 +, Camaleón wrote:
I neither like gnome-shell in its current state (I tested GNOME
3.0 in openSUSE and did not feel good
Hi all,
after an aptitude dist-upgrade to testing (and to unstable too) some GTK2
applications look ugly, like GTK1 appplications.
Gnome-terminal and Epiphany are two of them.
I tried install testing and after a aptitude upgrade the problem returned.
Does anyone know how to solve this?
On 2011-09-04 18:32 +0200, Chir0n wrote:
Hi all,
after an aptitude dist-upgrade to testing (and to unstable too) some GTK2
applications look ugly, like GTK1 appplications.
Gnome-terminal and Epiphany are two of them.
They are not, because they are not GTK2 applications anymore. This may
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:32:57 -0300, Chir0n wrote:
after an aptitude dist-upgrade to testing (and to unstable too) some
GTK2 applications look ugly, like GTK1 appplications.
Yep, here also, at least in my VM that runs wheezy (scrolls and menus are
like GTK1 old-style).
Gnome-terminal and
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:19:46 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 13:32:57 -0300, Chir0n wrote:
after an aptitude dist-upgrade to testing (and to unstable too) some
GTK2 applications look ugly, like GTK1 appplications.
Yep, here also, at least in my VM that runs wheezy (scrolls and
13 matches
Mail list logo
