Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
root@SDB03:/etc/apt# apt-get update
Hit http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates/main amd64 Packages
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org wheezy/main Sources/DiffIndex
Hit http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates/main i386 Packages
Hit
Hello Mark,
Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
Of course replace the mirror example I gave with the exact mirror repository
he needs to use. But the point is the [arch=arch,arch] bit.
This is generally not necessary, unless you want to _restrict_ the
architectures for which APT checks on
Claudius Hubig wrote:
Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
root@SDB03:/etc/apt# apt-get update
Hit http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates/main amd64 Packages
Hit http://ftp.de.debian.org wheezy/main Sources/DiffIndex
Hit http://security.debian.org wheezy/updates/main i386
Hugo writes:
One thing I noticed is that adobereader-enu depends on libgtk2.0-0 (=
2.4), which does not exist anywhere, it varies between 2.20.1-2.24.13,
but there is no 2.4.
2.24.13 is = 2.24.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Did that and the result is the same(below). One thing I noticed is that
adobereader-enu depends on libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.4), which does not exist
anywhere, it varies between 2.20.1-2.24.13, but there is no 2.4.
2.20 2.4, so that’s not a
Claudius Hubig wrote:
Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Did that and the result is the same(below). One thing I noticed is that
adobereader-enu depends on libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.4), which does not exist
anywhere, it varies between 2.20.1-2.24.13, but there is no 2.4.
2.20
I wrote:
2.24.13 is = 2.24.
Should read 2.24.13 is = 2.4.
Those are field seperators, not decimal points. The fields are
integers. There are no fractions in a Debian revision number.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Claudius,
Mark Allums m...@allums.com wrote:
Of course replace the mirror example I gave with the exact mirror
repository
he needs to use. But the point is the [arch=arch,arch] bit.
This is generally not necessary, unless you want to _restrict_ the
architectures for which APT checks on
Hi,
I am trying to install adobe reader with multiarch. Has anybody done that?
This is as far as I got:
===
Script started on Mon 24 Dec 2012 02:28:50 PM CST
root@SDB03:/home/hugo/Downloads# dpkg --print-architecture
amd64
Hi,
have you tried the acroread debian ball at www.deb-multimedia.org ?
hth,
Jerome
On 24/12/12 21:44, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install adobe reader with multiarch. Has anybody done that?
This is as far as I got:
===
Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
adobereader-enu depends on libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.4).
root@SDB03:/home/hugo/Downloads# apt-get install libgtk2.0-0:386
^i386
You want either
# apt-get install -f
or
# apt-get
Claudius Hubig wrote:
Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
adobereader-enu depends on libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.4).
root@SDB03:/home/hugo/Downloads# apt-get install libgtk2.0-0:386
^i386
You want either
# apt-get
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hi,
have you tried the acroread debian ball at www.deb-multimedia.org ?
I just did. And I got:
Script started on Mon 24 Dec 2012 03:23:05 PM CST
root@SDB03:/# apt-get install acroread
Reading
Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Claudius Hubig wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
root@SDB03:/home/hugo/Downloads# apt-get install libgtk2.0-0:386
^i386
# apt-get install libgtk2.0-0:i386
I
Claudius Hubig wrote:
Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Claudius Hubig wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
root@SDB03:/home/hugo/Downloads# apt-get install libgtk2.0-0:386
^i386
# apt-get install
Claudius Hubig wrote:
Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
libgtk2.0-0:i386 : Depends: libatk1.0-0:i386 (= 1.12.4) but it is not
going to be installed
[...]
It is likely that some of these are only available in Sid and your
package manager doesn’t consider it at the moment
Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Claudius, unfortunately it did not:
Hm, no idea what is broken then. For the record, I have these i386
packages installed as direct dependencies of libgtk2.0-0 (plus two
architecture:all packages that definitely shouldn't be the problem
Claudius Hubig wrote:
Hello Hugo,
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Claudius, unfortunately it did not:
Hm, no idea what is broken then. For the record, I have these i386
packages installed as direct dependencies of libgtk2.0-0 (plus two
architecture:all packages that definitely
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Claudius, unfortunately it did not:
Has he actually run
#dpkg --add-architecture i386
#apt-get update
?
He can also add/edit /etc/apt/sources.list to contain the line:
deb [arch=amd64, i386] http://ftp.somemirror.debian.org wheezy main contrib
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Claudius, unfortunately it did not:
Has he actually run
#dpkg --add-architecture i386
#apt-get update
?
He can also add/edit /etc/apt/sources.list to contain the line:
deb [arch=amd64, i386] http://ftp.somemirror.debian.org wheezy main
Mark Allums wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Claudius, unfortunately it did not:
Has he actually run
#dpkg --add-architecture i386
#apt-get update
?
He can also add/edit /etc/apt/sources.list to contain the line:
deb [arch=amd64, i386] http://ftp.somemirror.debian.org
21 matches
Mail list logo
