Hi,
tadziu wrote:
i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get
it working, and it's not performing as well as i've expected.
Re. the getting version 4.0
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Lorenzo Sutton lsut...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
tadziu wrote:
i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get
it working,
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 03:25:56 -0400, shawn wilson wrote:
On Jun 4, 2011 2:08 AM, jeremy jozwik jerjoz.for...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow... I'm still with 3.0.6.
my pc is still in 2.5
How brave! :-)
Y'all realize this isn't really anything to brag about?
Sure, but I don't need the latest
Wow... I'm still with 3.0.6.
my pc is still in 2.5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTimnO3HHNb3KJoF3zFRu6o9C6=u...@mail.gmail.com
On Jun 4, 2011 2:08 AM, jeremy jozwik jerjoz.for...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow... I'm still with 3.0.6.
my pc is still in 2.5
Y'all realize this isn't really anything to brag about? I just hope both of
you are running noscript or just turn scripting off (preferably the later
with browsers that
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, William Hopkins we.hopk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/02/11 at 08:15pm, tadziu wrote:
i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote:
E.g.
http://www.ixquick.com/
and
http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm
can't replace Google for my needs.
Have you tried http://duckduckgo.com/
They say they do not track and results are pretty nice. I
On 06/02/2011 07:31 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Arno Schuring writes:
I find DDG (http://duckduckgo.com/Duck_Duck_Go) satisfies my needs
perfectly.
Requires Javascript. Google doesn't.
I've been using ever since Google decided to start showing site
thumbnails on mouseover events.
I've never
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 08:32 +0200, alberto fuentes wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
E.g.
http://www.ixquick.com/
and
http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm
can't replace Google for my
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 09:38 +0200, Klaus Wolf wrote:
Hallo together,
it is not new that google or yahoo wants to see the whole world
as a glasfish. So for surch the web I use metacrawler like the
server of Uni Kassel www.metager.de .
whish a nice day to all
klaus
Thank you Klaus :)
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:15:11 +0200, tadziu wrote:
i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to stable
before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my second computer with
squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get it working, and it's not
performing as well as i've
wrote:
From: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net
Subject: Re: google to pull support for firefox 3,5
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Friday, June 3, 2011, 3:49 AM
I've been using ever since Google decided to start
showing site
thumbnails on mouseover events.
I've never seen those
DuckDuckGo is my first choice but I have found that the results just aren't as
good as Google for technical searches. For everyday stuff they're OK.
--- On Fri, 6/3/11, alberto fuentes paj...@gmail.com wrote:
From: alberto fuentes paj...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: google to pull support
On 20110602_222757, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 13:21 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:49:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 20:34 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance
i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get
it working, and it's not performing as well as i've expected.
On 06/02/11 at 08:15pm, tadziu wrote:
i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to get
it working, and it's not performing as well as i've expected.
If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it
does force people to buy newer hardware. How green of Google Inc.
Reminds me to start migrating away from their products and start
treating them as Microsoft's.
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 20:34 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it
does force people to buy newer hardware. How green of Google Inc.
Reminds me to start migrating away
On Jun 2, 2011 3:35 PM, Nuno Magalhães nunomagalh...@eu.ipp.pt wrote:
If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it
does force people to buy newer hardware. How green of Google Inc.
Reminds me to start
On 06/02/11 at 03:56pm, shawn wilson wrote:
On Jun 2, 2011 3:35 PM, Nuno Magalhães nunomagalh...@eu.ipp.pt wrote:
If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it
does force people to buy newer
On 06/02/11 at 09:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
Google's search engine.
E.g.
http://www.ixquick.com/
and
http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm
can't replace Google for my needs.
Scroogle IS google. So.. not a great
Perhaps gmail desktop alerts shouldn't work, and you would be advised to
upgrade if you wanted them, but gmail as a whole should continue working.
...as should all other google 'apps'...
i doubt that. i failed to change google account settings with ff3,5. just got
information that my browser
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:06 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
On 06/02/11 at 09:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
Google's search engine.
E.g.
http://www.ixquick.com/
and
http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/scraper.htm
can't
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:49:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 20:34 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
make sense. If. There's something called graceful degradation and it
does force people
On 06/02/11 at 10:17pm, tadziu wrote:
Perhaps gmail desktop alerts shouldn't work, and you would be advised to
upgrade if you wanted them, but gmail as a whole should continue working.
...as should all other google 'apps'...
i doubt that. i failed to change google account settings with
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 13:21 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:49:18 +0200, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 20:34 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
If their excuse was lack of standards' compliance maybe it'd kinda
make sense. If. There's
On 06/02/11 at 10:21pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:06 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
On 06/02/11 at 09:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
Google's search engine.
E.g.
http://www.ixquick.com/
and
As I said, it works even in IE5. I just lie and say I'm using a 'supported'
browser. the js-free version of gmail is a simple site.
implying that i'd like to use gmail in plain html, but i dont. are you
shure that
i'll preserve my current gmail functionality when i'll use your
workaround
On 06/02/11 at 10:54pm, tadziu wrote:
As I said, it works even in IE5. I just lie and say I'm using a 'supported'
browser. the js-free version of gmail is a simple site.
implying that i'd like to use gmail in plain html, but i dont. are you
shure that
i'll preserve my current gmail
On Jun 2, 2011 4:54 PM, tadziu tadzi...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, it works even in IE5. I just lie and say I'm using a
'supported' browser. the js-free version of gmail is a simple site.
implying that i'd like to use gmail in plain html, but i dont. are you
shure that
i'll preserve
I explicitly stated that I use plain HTML. I'm sure none of the fancy
javascript crap will keep working, which points out the foolishness of
treating a web page like an application.
i fully understand your point aswell as atitude towards web apps. but
mind two cases:
first: (not particular
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:27 PM, William Hopkins we.hopk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/02/11 at 08:15pm, tadziu wrote:
i'm just curious, is there any chance to bring iceweasel 4.0 to
stable before google ends support for 3,5? i got 4.0 on my
second computer with squeeze, but i had to mess a bit to
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:32 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
On 06/02/11 at 10:21pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 16:06 -0400, William Hopkins wrote:
On 06/02/11 at 09:49pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
Google's search
This is almost getting O/T, but anyways...
Ralf Mardorf (ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net on 2011-06-02 21:49 +0200):
Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
Google's search engine.
Like you said, it depends on what you use it for. I find DDG
Arno Schuring writes:
I find DDG (http://duckduckgo.com/Duck_Duck_Go) satisfies my needs
perfectly.
Requires Javascript. Google doesn't.
I've been using ever since Google decided to start showing site
thumbnails on mouseover events.
I've never seen those.
--
John Hasler
--
To
On 06/03/11 at 02:01am, Arno Schuring wrote:
This is almost getting O/T, but anyways...
Ralf Mardorf (ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net on 2011-06-02 21:49 +0200):
Unfortunately there seems to be no search engine able to replace
Google's search engine.
Like you said, it depends on what you use
36 matches
Mail list logo
