Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-26 Thread Simon Tod
--- Russell Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Tod wrote: So why can't modprobe find any of the modules - if indeed that's the problem - cause they're certainly where they're supposed to be. Looking through the output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* again suggests to me

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-25 Thread Simon Tod
Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached file. How does

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-25 Thread Simon Tod
Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached file. How does

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-25 Thread Russell Shaw
Simon Tod wrote: Surely I don't need to do make modules and make modules_install when I'm not compiling a kernel, just installing a pre-built one 2.4.20-686 (and the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules file)!? The output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* gives me the lengthy output in the attached

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-25 Thread Simon Tod
So why can't modprobe find any of the modules - if indeed that's the problem - cause they're certainly where they're supposed to be. Looking through the output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* again suggests to me that it's some sort of dependency or configuration problem... the same comment

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-25 Thread Russell Shaw
Simon Tod wrote: So why can't modprobe find any of the modules - if indeed that's the problem - cause they're certainly where they're supposed to be. Looking through the output of ~$ depmod ~$ modprobe -a \* again suggests to me that it's some sort of dependency or configuration problem... the

RE: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-19 Thread Simon Tod
them under /proc/sys/cpu/[0-9]+ by the way, you can also cat speed, speed-min and speed-max -Original Message- From: Simon Tod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new kernel, new problems Having

Re: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-19 Thread Russell Shaw
Simon Tod wrote: Thanks. Got the cpu speed bit solved. Looking through the PCMCIA HowTo I've checked to see that /etc/pcmica/config, /etc/default/pcmcia and /etc/init.d/pcmica are the same under both kernels. My new kernel is missing the line serial_cs 4384 0 (unused) from

new kernel, new problems

2003-02-18 Thread Simon Tod
Having installed kernel-image-2.4.20-686 and kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.20-686 to rid myself of a couple of problems I was having with my old kernel (2.4.19), I've now picked up a couple of new problems. 1) A failure to get the pcmcia modem running - I notice there is a pcmcia entry in

RE: new kernel, new problems

2003-02-18 Thread Narins, Josh
multiple processors, you should find them under /proc/sys/cpu/[0-9]+ by the way, you can also cat speed, speed-min and speed-max -Original Message- From: Simon Tod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new kernel, new