On 8/23/2012 10:00 AM, hvw59601 wrote:
Mindful of what Stan Hoeppner in various posts has written about SSD I
thought I'd put swap on an SSD I installed (Samsung SSD 830 128GB) in
order to get superfast hibernate.
Surprise: it is slower than usual and the disk light is on.
[snip]
Is there
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:42:45AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
This email mentions nothing of any troubleshooting performed by you up
to this point. It's sole purpose seems to be to blame me for what you
apparently believe is a bad recommendation.
I read it very differently: veiled admiration
Le jeudi 23 août 2012 à 10:00 -0500, hvw59601 a écrit :
Hi,
Mindful of what Stan Hoeppner in various posts has written about SSD I
thought I'd put swap on an SSD I installed (Samsung SSD 830 128GB) in
order to get superfast hibernate.
Surprise: it is slower than usual and the disk light
On 8/24/2012 3:43 AM, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:42:45AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
This email mentions nothing of any troubleshooting performed by you up
to this point. It's sole purpose seems to be to blame me for what you
apparently believe is a bad recommendation.
I
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:00:46AM -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
Hi,
Mindful of what Stan Hoeppner in various posts has written about SSD
I thought I'd put swap on an SSD I installed (Samsung SSD 830 128GB)
in order to get superfast hibernate.
I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit of
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:04 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit of SSDs that they have
a tiny access time? But that their read speed is about the same as a
normal disk (also, I might be wrong, but I understand their write speed
is average).
This
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Gaël DONVAL wrote:
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:04 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit of SSDs that they have
a tiny access time? But that their read speed is about the same as a
normal disk (also, I might
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:58 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Gaël DONVAL wrote:
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:04 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit of SSDs that they have
a tiny access time? But that
On 24/08/12 08:29 AM, Gaël DONVAL wrote:
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:58 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Gaël DONVAL wrote:
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 12:04 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit :
I might be wrong here, but isn't the key benefit of SSDs that
Gary Dale garyd...@rogers.com wrote:
So why would switching to an SSD slow hibernation times? Frankly I can't
think of any reasons (comparing apples to apples) why a faster drive
should lead to slower performance. Possibly it's an interface issue -
the SSD's controller is getting swamped -
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 16:47 +0200, Sven Hartge a écrit :
Maybe the alignment of the swap partition is off? SSD react very badly
if you don't align your partitions to their erase block size. This is
why I always recommend to align them to 1MB boundaries as most SSDs
available today seem to
Gaël DONVAL wrote:
Le vendredi 24 août 2012 à 16:47 +0200, Sven Hartge a écrit :
Maybe the alignment of the swap partition is off? SSD react very badly
if you don't align your partitions to their erase block size. This is
why I always recommend to align them to 1MB boundaries as most SSDs
12 matches
Mail list logo
