Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal

2000-07-06 Thread Joseph Carter
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 04:05:37PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: This is the same as the old Who does Debian Admin answer to? thread. It seems more like the I don't want this to happen, so I will be a rules lawyer thread to me. Well, not that anybody asked me (because they didn't) but as I see

Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal

2000-07-06 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Joey So we issue DFSG v2, a new document that just happens to include the Joey text of DFSG v1 verbatim, except for oner paragraph. I think that is what should be done in any case, if this GR passes. We leave the DFSG around (since other

Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal

2000-07-06 Thread Joey Hess
Manoj Srivastava wrote: Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Joey So we issue DFSG v2, a new document that just happens to include the Joey text of DFSG v1 verbatim, except for oner paragraph. I think that is what should be done in any case, if this GR passes. We leave the

Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal

2000-07-06 Thread Craig Sanders
(this is probably a mistake but i'm breaking my rule of not responding to the stupid things you say because the stupidity level in your message is particularly annoying) On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 10:08:18PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: Well, not that anybody asked me (because they didn't) but as I