On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 02:34:44AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
[Seriously -- I'm rather thick skinned, and wouldn't recognize an insult
if it came up and whapped me on the knuckles.]
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:10:10AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Clearly, then, I am going to have to try
My gratitude to Branden Robinson for help in constructing this message in a
form that will hopefully be clear to all.
*** SNIP HERE ***
Per section A.5 ("Expiry") of the constitution, both John Goerzen's General
Resolution regarding non-free, and Anthony Towns's amendment thereto, have
expired.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
If my memory serves me correctly, Branden I decide that our
proposals should be on the same ballot; though there does remain some
difference in them. We think that there should be three options of
the ballot: (ordering of A and B was done by a
Are we all now clear on why ballots must be understandable, and why
transparency of process is important?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:06:31PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
BTW I would have edited the vote pages (since that area of the web site is
allowed to all web people), but I thought it wasn't allowed to anyone except
the Secretary to do it.
If it is in fact allowed for others to edit those
On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 02:34:44AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
[Seriously -- I'm rather thick skinned, and wouldn't recognize an insult
if it came up and whapped me on the knuckles.]
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:10:10AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Clearly, then, I am going to have to try
My gratitude to Branden Robinson for help in constructing this message in a
form that will hopefully be clear to all.
*** SNIP HERE ***
Per section A.5 (Expiry) of the constitution, both John Goerzen's General
Resolution regarding non-free, and Anthony Towns's amendment thereto, have
expired.
There are two standing proposals that I know of. If something hasn't been
done (I believe either Manoj or Overfiend are on vacation or recently came
back from), I'd like to clearify.
I had a conversation with Overfiend last week and was informed
(unofficially, unfortunatly) that he and Manoj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
If my memory serves me correctly, Branden I decide that our
proposals should be on the same ballot; though there does remain some
difference in them. We think that there should be three options of
the ballot: (ordering of A and B was done by a
Are we all now clear on why ballots must be understandable, and why
transparency of process is important?
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 05:26:44PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Are we all now clear on why ballots must be understandable, and why
transparency of process is important?
You think something has been learned from all of this? bwahahahaha!
--
Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are we all now clear on why ballots must be understandable, and why
transparency of process is important?
As an observer, and not a developer (note to self: you've been hanging
out on the debian developers lists for 4+ years now, get off your ass
and become a developer already!), I think
* Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001108 19:01]:
You think something has been learned from all of this? bwahahahaha!
Yes. No more vacations for Darren. :)
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really
impressed down here, I can tell you.''
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 01:50:49PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
If my memory serves me correctly, Branden I decide that our
proposals should be on the same ballot; though there does remain some
difference in them. We think that there should be three options of
the ballot:
14 matches
Mail list logo
