On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:25:26PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 05:58:47PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
It'd have a substantial effect if a supermajority was required: if 60
of 100 people preferred your second preference, and voted Yes/Further
Discussion/No, while 40
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 09:42:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Certainly, you can vote however you like. But be aware that other people
might _not_ want to hinder their second preference just because they've
got no chance of getting their first preference.
If they don't want to put their
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 12:36:48PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
First note: you don't attempt to distinguish between "this is worth
redoing" and "this is not worth redoing", in your "status quo".
As I've said, I don't see any benefit in doing it. Whichever's
selected, as far as the
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 01:37:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
From A.3(1): ``If Further Discussion wins then the entire resolution
procedure is set back to the start of the discussion period.'' From
A.3(2): ``If Further Discussion wins then the entire procedure is set
back to the start of
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:25:26PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 05:58:47PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
It'd have a substantial effect if a supermajority was required: if 60
of 100 people preferred your second preference, and voted Yes/Further
Discussion/No, while 40
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 09:42:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Certainly, you can vote however you like. But be aware that other people
might _not_ want to hinder their second preference just because they've
got no chance of getting their first preference.
If they don't want to put their first
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 12:36:48PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
First note: you don't attempt to distinguish between this is worth
redoing and this is not worth redoing, in your status quo.
As I've said, I don't see any benefit in doing it. Whichever's
selected, as far as the constitution's
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 01:37:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
From A.3(1): ``If Further Discussion wins then the entire resolution
procedure is set back to the start of the discussion period.'' From
A.3(2): ``If Further Discussion wins then the entire procedure is set
back to the start of the
8 matches
Mail list logo
