C L A V V X PI e m A I a rA v b L A n oL i i I G a zI t e U R x aS ra n M A c3,75 1,22 3,32 http://eimoearValdeLomb.tripod.com
Hello world,
One of the issues Debian often stands for is transparency and openness
-- indeed, the openness of our bug tracking system is codified in the
Social Contract's statement We will not hide problems. However, one
particular area of significance within the project is not open at all:
the
Hi,
I have one comment on this: when the posts were made, they
were made under the mantilla of a promise of privacy; I think it is
wrong to retroactively change the rules without asking the authors
for permission to publish.
So, change the redaction rules to always listen to
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
---
In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 08:38:09PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I have one comment on this: when the posts were made, they
were made under the mantilla of a promise of privacy; I think it is
wrong to retroactively change the rules without asking the authors
for permission to
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 07:01:16PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
I would suggest that declassification of posts affected by a GR be put
on hold if a proposal is made for a GR while the GR process takes
place [since the absolute minimum time that a GR can take is 2 weeks.]
4.2.2.1 does cover
Anthony Towns wrote:
Comments, suggestions and seconds appreciated.
I'm very happy to second this proposal, since it saves me the bother of
finishing the rough draft of the same thing I've been sitting on for a
year, and is much more thought out to boot. Clearly an idea whose time
has come. :-)
Hi,
Here is my proposed change, that would make the process opt-in
by the actual authors, and still give a hearing to any others who may
be affected. I think this process allows people who may have posted
only under the protection of the privacy umbrella, while still
allowing the
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:24 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Here is my proposed change, that would make the process opt-in
by the actual authors, and still give a hearing to any others who may
be affected. I think this process allows people who may have posted
only under the
9 matches
Mail list logo
