Le Dim 12 Février 2006 02:22, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
Hi,
I second Adeodato Simó's proposal but at the same time I consider it
still leaves some spaces for the absolutism interpretation which
tends to plague Debian. I consider we should have reasonable space
for judgment for many things in
2006/2/11, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There isn't anything to do with politess. If I hurted you, them please
accept my apologies. But I'm frank enough to express my view as I
feel them. As a non-native English speaker, the vocabulary might
not always be appropriate.
Hmm, you should
On Friday 10 February 2006 19:15, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
Thorough summaries written by representative proponents and opponents of
each principal side of the GFDL debate would be well received at this
time. Such summaries are requested. For other DDs, I cannot speak, but
such summaries
On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant outgrape:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 9 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
The only people it made happy are extremists.
Oh, so I am extremist now.
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:03:45PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
In other situations, we might want to incorporate parts of the manual
into the source (for tooltips, help texts, usage examples, etc..). We
certainly couldn't do that with a GFDL manual
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:51:08PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
You are allowed to *accompany* your document with the license. But an
invariant section must be *part of* the document. [...]
In the case of a reference card (as I understand the DFSG), you
would not be allowed to just
also sprach Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.12.0222 +0100]:
s/include no invariant sections/don't include any significant contents
to prevent our Freedom in invariant sections/ and matching changes to
the text.
I think this sounds incredibly vague and leaves significant up in
the air
Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 09:22 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
Am I in violation of the License merely by unpacking make or
by doing an tla get on my machine? If I am, why is this free -- I
can't even unpack the sources with no Invariant Sections, with no
Front-Cover Texts,
Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 22:16 +0200, Anton Zinoviev a écrit :
GFDL doesn't place any restrictions on the form of the printed
document. For example it can be a collection of unbound sheets of
paper plus some unbound pictures plus some bug maps plus a cup or two.
All you have to do in
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:10:19 +0200, Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:31:30PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
If my opinion is not the same as yours I am allowed to express my
opinion in additional invariant section. Or if I think your opinion
is misleading the
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:19:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
We have already discussed many examples, if you have some new example
you are welcome to share it with us. :-)
I don't recall the following example being brought up.
Let's assume a manual, written by
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:31:20PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Now, I'd like to download this (translated) manual and place it on a
portable device I own, so I can easily read it without killing a bunch
of trees. I think this is clearly a useful modification, and I think
that I should be
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
don't be an idiot. you only have to keep the invariant sections if you
are DISTRIBUTING a copy. you can do whatever you want with your own
copy.
Right, so you can't *distribute* a copy on an ASCII-only medium, even
of the English translation of a
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 05:19:37PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
don't be an idiot. you only have to keep the invariant sections if you
are DISTRIBUTING a copy. you can do whatever you want with your own
copy.
Right, so you can't
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there's nothing in the GFDL that prevents you from doing that. the
capabilities of your medium are beyond the ability of the GFDL (or any
license) to control.
This is hardly true. The GFDL says you must transmit the original
Japanese text in the case
On 12 Feb 2006, Craig Sanders told this:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:31:20PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Now, I'd like to download this (translated) manual and place it on
a portable device I own, so I can easily read it without killing a
bunch of trees. I think this is clearly a useful
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:44:51PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
What if he wants to further distribute the stuff to other
people who are using a device like his? I mean, sharing stuff useful
to me is one of the prime reasons I like free software -- if stuff is
useful, I can share.
17 matches
Mail list logo
