On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:55:37 -0400, Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Unfortunately, it seems to me that currently the project has no way of
dealing with people who refuse to look at new ways of doing things.
Sure. The project has no way of dealing with people who are
Hi,
On Saturday 15 March 2008 22:40, Marc Haber wrote:
Additionally, it may be a good idea to have regular IRC conferences
where the DPL is available to answer questions. A good time would
probably be a week after bits have been posted so that the questions
that the bits have raised can be
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
All this replacement in favour of a better person sounds very
nasty, mean, and likely to be highly subjective to me, and most
organizations do not often throw people out while they are still
performing their duties.
Of
Charles Plessy wrote:
I started to wonder about modularity in the use of the Debian
infrastructure in 2006, because of a problem with the clustalw package.
As you can see on the graph, its popcon score started to decrease around
july.
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080316 21:01]:
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The creiteria can be more than just voting on issues -- look for
number of emails on threads on a issue raised, number of emails sent to
the bug report, number of
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080317 00:24]:
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:13 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080316 21:01]:
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The creiteria can be more than just voting on
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:13 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080316 21:01]:
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
The creiteria can be more than just voting on issues -- look for
number of emails on threads on a issue
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:33 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
I see; so there are no members of the technical committee who have
failed twice to vote?
I'm not sure how not voting twice in a row makes someone a less
important contributor by definition.
I see; so what number do you think would
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:33 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
But I would really prefer if you would fix your own packages instead of
relaying on our BSPers.
Actually, I'm very good about uploading fixes for RC bugs promptly. The
bugs I think you are referring to were marked severity important.
On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Actually, I'm very good about uploading fixes for RC bugs promptly.
The bugs I think you are referring to were marked severity
important. Perhaps the bugs were tagged incorrectly?
Severity != tag. And the severity is correct.
I must have missed the
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 02:46 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Actually, I'm very good about uploading fixes for RC bugs promptly.
The bugs I think you are referring to were marked severity
important. Perhaps the bugs were tagged incorrectly?
Please respect list policies and don't duplicate mails.
On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I thought all RC bugs were supposed to have severity serious or
higher. Has that been changed?
RC != RG.
You don't read debian-devel-announce, do you?
Of course I do. What I said was that
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 03:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I thought all RC bugs were supposed to have severity serious or
higher. Has that been changed?
RC != RG.
Ah, well then there is no need to berate me for failing to fix the bug
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 03:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
And what exactly does this have to do with the technical committee?
No idea. It looks like it all started with
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and since you're still
wondering about RC/RG bugs, I'm answering these questions.
It would be a shame
14 matches
Mail list logo
