Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:06 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I think this is the core of the disagreement. I do not call it a
temporary override of a foundation document; I call it a temporary
practical consensus between the needs of our users and the needs of
the free
On Tue, May 12 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 06:59:41PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
On Sun May 10 18:34, Luk Claes wrote:
3. Option X overrides a foundation document, possibly temporarily (?)
Not possible. You can only override a decision and amending a
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 10:53 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
DFSG is a guideline and a target: we must no go far as the nearest point
we reached, but it still a guideline.
Consider:
- we never had a full DFSG Debian (also when DFSG was written)
- we have RC also on stable releases. What
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 20:09 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Either Social Contract section one and the DFSG prohibit the
distribution of a non-free blob in the release, or they do not.
This 'in the release' is bogus, I guess you mean in 'main'?
Debian is only free
4 matches
Mail list logo
