On Tue, 18 May 2004 01:04:12 +0200
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:33:02AM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
Hey, does anybody object to a call for votes on
http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_004 being put out by the secretary?
There was much discussion
Hey, does anybody object to a call for votes on
http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_004 being put out by the secretary?
There was much discussion on the issue on many lists, and going by the
proposers and seconders, everybody I would expect to actively
participate in any discussion has already
I, of course, mean Ready to vote on 2004-004? in the subject :) Just
had a bit of a brainfart.
On Mon, 17 May 2004 00:33:02 -0400
David B Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, does anybody object to a call for votes on
http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_004 being put out by the secretary
On Sun, 02 May 2004 13:15:33 -0500
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On consultation with the other sponsors, I have decided to
add a sunset clause to the proposed Transition Guide, so that the
specific references to Sarge are ex-purged after it is released.
I second
On Sun, 2 May 2004 17:00:51 -0400
David B Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 02 May 2004 13:15:33 -0500
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On consultation with the other sponsors, I have decided to
add a sunset clause to the proposed Transition Guide, so
On Sun, 02 May 2004 13:15:33 -0500
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On consultation with the other sponsors, I have decided to
add a sunset clause to the proposed Transition Guide, so that the
specific references to Sarge are ex-purged after it is released.
I second
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:46:25 -0500
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 06:17:40PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
The wordy proposal, while wordy, covers everything - and it also
provides rationale and context for the user.
Providing context for the user
I second this proposed option for GR 2004_04
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:57:45 -0500
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[This version contains typographical fixes, and a tightening
up of the grammar, of the foundation document. I do not
believe any substantive
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:55:41 -0500
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:57:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I hereby propose that we amend the constitution to add to the list of
foundation documents the document attached in this proposal, titled
Transition
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:55:41 -0500
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:57:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I hereby propose that we amend the constitution to add to the list of
foundation documents the document attached in this proposal, titled
Transition
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:34:45 -0500
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 11:03:08AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
Given Manoj's answer which basically says you guys can agree to whatever
rules of conduct you want, I'd like to ask that you *not* generate any
new
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:34:45 -0500
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 11:03:08AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
Given Manoj's answer which basically says you guys can agree to whatever
rules of conduct you want, I'd like to ask that you *not* generate any
new
it.
---
David B. Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oftc.net/
4096R/59DDCB9F: CC53 F124 35C0 7BC2 58FE 7A3C 157D DFD9 59DD CB9F
(Retreive from subkeys.pgp.net or risk key
it.
---
David B. Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oftc.net/
4096R/59DDCB9F: CC53 F124 35C0 7BC2 58FE 7A3C 157D DFD9 59DD CB9F
(Retreive from subkeys.pgp.net or risk key
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 13:07:39 +0100
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 09:05:27AM +, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Is this just a game to you?
I wondered how many messages it would take for someone to notice.
I've always wondered why so many threads in Debian ended up
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 13:07:39 +0100
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 09:05:27AM +, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Is this just a game to you?
I wondered how many messages it would take for someone to notice.
I've always wondered why so many threads in Debian ended up
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:29:39 -0600
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:29:39 -0600
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:06:06 -0600
Debian Project Secretary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the IRC debate (to be held on irc.oftc.net)
I've put in a CNAME for one of our servers, at dpl2004.oftc.net. Please
use that hostname in any annoucements (hello, DWN :), or an hostname (no
problem with it being
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:06:06 -0600
Debian Project Secretary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the IRC debate (to be held on irc.oftc.net)
I've put in a CNAME for one of our servers, at dpl2004.oftc.net. Please
use that hostname in any annoucements (hello, DWN :), or an hostname (no
problem with it being
On 3 Mar 2003 07:46:42 -
Moshe Zadka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a candidate, I would like some idea of the format to better prepare
myself. Such things as time per question, and number of ping-pongs
(that is, e.g., could I reply to another candidate's reply to my
answer, and so forth).
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:53:59 -0500
David B Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions are, of course, welcome :)
Just to clarify, since people seem to be asking a lot; yes, logs will be
available, and will be posted to the web site.
That people even need to ask is disturbing, it's a given
Hello everybody,
This Friday, at 22:00 UTC, the Debian Project Debate (real-time/IRC
portion) will take place. The formal portion of the debate is expected
to last for an hour.
It will take place in two channels on the Freenode IRC network,
#debian-dpl-debate and #debian-dpl-discuss. The
On 3 Mar 2003 07:46:42 -
Moshe Zadka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a candidate, I would like some idea of the format to better prepare
myself. Such things as time per question, and number of ping-pongs
(that is, e.g., could I reply to another candidate's reply to my
answer, and so forth).
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:53:59 -0500
David B Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions are, of course, welcome :)
Just to clarify, since people seem to be asking a lot; yes, logs will be
available, and will be posted to the web site.
That people even need to ask is disturbing, it's a given
Hello everybody,
This Friday, at 22:00 UTC, the Debian Project Debate (real-time/IRC
portion) will take place. The formal portion of the debate is expected
to last for an hour.
It will take place in two channels on the Freenode IRC network,
#debian-dpl-debate and #debian-dpl-discuss. The
Evening, all :)
Could the candidates please give us a rundown of what time of day
(generally speaking, and in UTC please) would be best for them, for the
live portion of the DPL debate?
If you'd like to also point out some upcoming dates where you're
more-or-less free, that would be great.
27 matches
Mail list logo
