Hello Raul,
Very interesting proposal. Here are some grammatical corrections. I
have some other issues with this, but I'll will address those in another
mail.
Raul Miller wrote:
Debian's Social Contract
The Debian Project is an association of individuals who have made common
cause to
Raul Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:42:21AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
5. Programs that doesn't meet our free-software standards
Replace doesn't with don't or do not
We
support interoperability standards such as Linux Standard Base
Raul Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:42:21AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
5. Programs that doesn't meet our free-software standards
Replace doesn't with don't or do not
We
support interoperability standards such as Linux Standard Base
John Goerzen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:52:49PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
been exceeded, in the (bit over) two weeks since the GR was proposed
there haven't been enough seconds for it to be called to a vote. Here
are the posts pertaining to the vote as I have followed them (please
John Goerzen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:52:49PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
been exceeded, in the (bit over) two weeks since the GR was proposed
there haven't been enough seconds for it to be called to a vote. Here
are the posts pertaining to the vote as I have followed them (please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
So how about if we go ahead and get this thing moved to a vote, so we
can all get back to working on the sarge installer?
An excellent idea! However, although the minimum discussion period has
been exceeded, in the (bit over)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
So how about if we go ahead and get this thing moved to a vote, so we
can all get back to working on the sarge installer?
An excellent idea! However, although the minimum discussion period has
been exceeded, in the (bit over)
(as
they modify the constitution).
Hope this helps!
Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ikFEKl23+OYWEqURAkXeAJ0c48oXZHfsFapW7wo7q4Vu18MBLQCg2VxH
OJ9pQcxmXZMZelAt4JYnldk=
=/6HL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Here is the new version.
This vote is being conducted in accordance with the Debian
Constitution, Section A, Standard Resolution Procedure, to vote on a
General Resolution to amend the constitution to disambiguate section
4.1.5.
Don't know how I missed this
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Yet another update for the ballot.
conducted in accordance with the policy delinated in Section A, Standard
s/delinated/delineated/
Other than that, looks good.
Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
(as
they modify the constitution).
Hope this helps!
Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ikFEKl23+OYWEqURAkXeAJ0c48oXZHfsFapW7wo7q4Vu18MBLQCg2VxH
OJ9pQcxmXZMZelAt4JYnldk=
=/6HL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Here is the new version.
This vote is being conducted in accordance with the Debian
Constitution, Section A, Standard Resolution Procedure, to vote on a
General Resolution to amend the constitution to disambiguate section
4.1.5.
Don't know how I missed this
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Yet another update for the ballot.
conducted in accordance with the policy delinated in Section A, Standard
s/delinated/delineated/
Other than that, looks good.
Joe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grrr, I seconded the wrong one before...
I hearby second the following proposal.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi folks,
Here is a spell checked version, and also one that removes the
modify clause
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One nit:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00058.html
Jochen Voss == [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Nahmias == [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hearby second this proposal.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
- -- Start of PGP signed section.
Hi folks,
Here is my amended proposal, further changed by incorporating
Branden's suggestions. Would the sponsors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hearby second this amendment.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson wrote:
I propose the following amendment:
- 5.2 The Foundation Documents are the works entitled Debian
- Social Contract and Debian Free Software Guidelines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grrr, I seconded the wrong one before...
I hearby second the following proposal.
Joe Nahmias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi folks,
Here is a spell checked version, and also one that removes the
modify clause
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One nit:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00058.html
Jochen Voss == [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Nahmias == [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
19 matches
Mail list logo
