their rights to pull the accounts
of the people in question.
A denial of service attack is grounds for exclusion and DMUP states:
Don't by any ... reckless ... act interfere with the work of another
developer
Regards,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim+61 403 411 672
Do
a bit of it to you now:
* Do not use foul language; besides, some people receive the
lists via packet radio, where swearing is illegal.
as well as:
* Try not to flame; it is not polite.
Pasc
[1]: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
--
Pascal Hakim
quote a bit of it to you now:
* Do not use foul language; besides, some people receive the
lists via packet radio, where swearing is illegal.
as well as:
* Try not to flame; it is not polite.
Pasc
[1]: http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
--
Pascal Hakim
any data to prove this, or is this just a wild hypothesis?
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim+61 4 0341 1672
has also has copies of some lists which aren't archived on the web, such as
debian-private.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim+61 4 0341 1672
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
has also has copies of some lists which aren't archived on the web, such as
debian-private.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim+61 4 0341 1672
Hi,
Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not?
Would you change this?
Do you believe the Tech Committee is effective in its role for the project?
Cheers,
Pasc
[1]: http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
--
Pascal Hakim
Hi,
Which of the groups/people on [1] do you consider delegates? Why or why not?
Would you change this?
Do you believe the Tech Committee is effective in its role for the project?
Cheers,
Pasc
[1]: http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
--
Pascal Hakim
8 matches
Mail list logo
