not be doing much for the forseeable future
due to the latter until things improve. Thankfully, this has been
picked up and dealt with in the last week. Thanks to all involved for
their efforts here.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
pgphj0Cby23X1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
certainly couldn't do that with a GFDL manual and GPL source.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt
require and uphold
the same set of freedoms of both, which obviously includes the ability
to modify without restrictions on what is modifiable.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp
.
Could we draw this debate to some sort of conclusion? I continue to
remain unconvinced by the majority of your arguments, many of which
are still poorly explained.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:33:05PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the following is an useful test. If the license forbids some
modification that is necessary in order to adapt the document to some
need
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:41:42PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I think the following is an useful test. If the license forbids some
modification that is necessary in order to adapt the document to some
need, then the document is non-free
and completely uninformative (as was the post
you are replying to). There is no explanation at all, so we are non
the wiser than had you not posted at all. This is not at all helpful.
Thanks for your consideration,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http
the discussion: we have already
read the point you were trying to make, so it doesn't need repeating
ad nauseam.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG
between retaining them indefinitely without any means of
change, and not being able to remove what has become lengthy and/or
inaccurate or inappropriate baggage.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux
in the context of DFSG.
You aren't free to remove parts you don't want. We wouldn't accept
that in source code, and I fail to see why documentation should be any
different in this particular respect.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roger Leigh
I think that this behaviour, as well as that on other lists in the
recent past, is making it increasingly necessary that we introduce
some way of enforcing a minimum standard of decency on our lists. [...]
You pillory[1] a man over his -private
is not a clear one, since
they are often one and the same thing, and this has been discussed
quite a lot during past discussion.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org
reality when it
contradicts your lunatic viewpoint.
Craig,
None of your commentary above is constructive. If you have a point to
make, please do so without the personal abuse. This sort of vitriol
only serves to detract from your claims, be they valid or not.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
(if not all) of the upstream lists I
participate upon.
You would have liked the vitriolic diatribe Craig mailed to me
privately off-list, in response to my request for politeness, even
less...
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net
.
=
Cheers,
aj
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
came into being, so people
using the licence are likely to be at least peripherally aware of the
issues.
While it's true that we have tried to get it solved quietly, it's not
true to say that we collectively did nothing.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux
is not a DFSG-free licence, the consequences
are clear.
If we do hold a GR over this decision, I won't be voting any
differently than I did in either of the above votes; my principles
haven't changed since last time I voted.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux
, myself.
Just because people vote in a way that you might not does not mean
they are uninformed.
I'm not convinced.
Happily, the OP still has a chance to change his mind ;-)
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
Of The Above
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
Of The Above
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
conversation. Just because you consider it
to be nothing particularly offensive does not mean that others feel
the same way. For the record, I was disgusted by your post. If you
have a point to make, make it calmly and rationally.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http
conversation. Just because you consider it
to be nothing particularly offensive does not mean that others feel
the same way. For the record, I was disgusted by your post. If you
have a point to make, make it calmly and rationally.
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http
23 matches
Mail list logo
