On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 06:43:41PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o dijo [Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 04:13:20PM -0400]:
> > Whether we recommend the one with non-free firmware or not (some have
> > proposed that the "free" installer would have "visual priority
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:32:23AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> If a free installer is still produced and offered alongside the one
> including non-free-firmware, would you feel more at ease? That sounds
> like an easy compromise to make, and many people would probably
> welcome it.
>
> Debian
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 01:57:59PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:52 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > Interesting. What would be the composition, roles, duties of that
> > Strategy Council ?
>
> Like all committees and boards I envision, the Strategy
Apologies for this administrative question, but we have a couple of
votes active at the moment, and so inquiring minds want to know.
Due to an oversight, I managed to forget to update my GPG subkey's
expiration date. I've since fixed it, and uploaded it to
keyring.debian.org, but there's the
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 11:32:35AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Pierre-Elliott Bécue - 06.11.21, 11:06:58 CET:
> > That being said, the name is indeed outdated, and "Debian Archive
> > Team" sounds quite nice.
>
> Agreed. I like this name.
+1, and +1 about ***not*** trying to do this
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 06:51:05PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> 4. The Project Leader has a casting vote. There is a quorum of 3Q. The
>default option is "None of the above."
Should this be, "unless specified elsewhere"?
>
> 6.3. Procedure
>
> 1. Resolution process.
>
>The
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:03:52AM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
Then mail the ballot to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't worry about spacing of the columns or any quote characters
() that your reply inserts. NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed
(or PGP signed) with your key that is in the
Let's try again with the correct GPG key
I second Craig's proposal.
- Ted
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:09:30AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
I second Craig's proposal.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:45:18AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Tue
Let's try again with the correct GPG key
I second Craig's proposal.
- Ted
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:09:30AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
I second Craig's proposal.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:45:18AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Tue
I second Craig's proposal.
- Ted
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:45:18AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 08:41:35PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
The Debian Project,
affirming its committment to principles of freeness for all
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:46:32PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
But it *is* released. Your claim was that all the fonts would have to
disappear. Actually, no, you haven't substantiated that.
Well, there is certainly a double-standard going on about fonts.
People have argued that since
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:11:03AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
But for a font, the ability to tweak the bitmap might well be, because
there is nothing more to a rendered font than the bitmap; for a
binary program, there is a logical structure to the instructions which
it is
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:08:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally, I'm still trying to decide myself what is going to happen
with Debian. Is it a bunch of fanatics who are more interested in
philosophy than technology, in which case
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:00:17PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
The issue is actually more complex because of the non-free section of
the distribution. The pragmatists will simply use that one. People
like me who suffer from a mild form of Free Software Extremism are
those who are losing
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:46:32PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
But it *is* released. Your claim was that all the fonts would have to
disappear. Actually, no, you haven't substantiated that.
Well, there is certainly a double-standard going on about fonts.
People have argued that since
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:11:03AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
But for a font, the ability to tweak the bitmap might well be, because
there is nothing more to a rendered font than the bitmap; for a
binary program, there is a logical structure to the instructions which
it is
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:08:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally, I'm still trying to decide myself what is going to happen
with Debian. Is it a bunch of fanatics who are more interested in
philosophy than technology, in which case
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:39:55PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:56:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
At the rate we're currently going, I don't really expect to be able to
achieve this this year. In light of the new Social Contract, however,
I don't believe there
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:39:55PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:56:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
At the rate we're currently going, I don't really expect to be able to
achieve this this year. In light of the new Social Contract, however,
I don't believe there
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:56:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
As this is no longer limited to software, and as this decision was
made by developers after and during discussion of how we should consider
non-software content such as documentation and firmware, I don't believe
I can justify the
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 12:54:14PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Theodore Ts'o ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You forgot one other thing. We'll also have to strip **ALL**
**FONTS** from Debian, since fonts come in binary form, and we don't
have anything approaching the preferred form
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:56:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
As this is no longer limited to software, and as this decision was
made by developers after and during discussion of how we should consider
non-software content such as documentation and firmware, I don't believe
I can justify the
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 12:54:14PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Theodore Ts'o ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You forgot one other thing. We'll also have to strip **ALL**
**FONTS** from Debian, since fonts come in binary form, and we don't
have anything approaching the preferred form
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:24:49PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
it is not up to you to tell me HOW i may say something.
i'll use whatever words i feel are necessary to get my point across. if you
don't like some of the words that i choose to employ, then tough luck - get a life.
Craig,
It
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:24:49PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
it is not up to you to tell me HOW i may say something.
i'll use whatever words i feel are necessary to get my point across. if you
don't like some of the words that i choose to employ, then tough luck - get a
life.
Craig,
It
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:42:23PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
General Resolution: Status of the non-free section
Text: The actual text of the GR is:
The next release of Debian will not be accompanied
by a
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 12:55:07PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
[For the W3C docs, for example, there is no reason except convenience
why they would _have_ to be served from .debian.org - could we get them
to host the .debs of their own documentation? ]
The problem with third party
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 12:55:07PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
[For the W3C docs, for example, there is no reason except convenience
why they would _have_ to be served from .debian.org - could we get them
to host the .debs of their own documentation? ]
The problem with third party
28 matches
Mail list logo
