On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:06:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 05:01:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a ??crit :
I think that it would be very helpful to describe how the question has
already been resolved. My understanding is that the various proposals
add policy on
Thanks Anthony and Lucas for your suggestions.
Even if it can be improved, I am reluctant to change the wording of the
amendement, given that the whole point is a) to say that a GR is unwelcome, and
b) to reduce as much as possible the “attack surface” on the voted text in case
some people want
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome
Charles == Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Charles Thanks Anthony and Lucas for your suggestions. Even if it
Charles can be improved, I am reluctant to change the wording of
Charles the amendement, given that the whole point is a) to say
Charles that a GR is unwelcome,
Hi,
On Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2014, Sam Hartman wrote:
my response is so what? People are doing their jobs, let's not get in
their way.
I'd rather this amendment not push people away simply because they
disagree over whether all the questions have been answered.
I agree. I've also been
Le Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 05:01:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the
Hi,
On Sonntag, 19. Oktober 2014, Charles Plessy wrote:
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing
General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the
outcome of the
Le dimanche, 19 octobre 2014, 23.29:21 Charles Plessy a écrit :
--
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing
General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless
of the outcome of
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Charles Plessy wrote:
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
the vote.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Here is the text:
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org (2014-10-19):
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
the vote.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Here is the text:
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive
Charles Plessy wrote:
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
the vote.
Regarding the subject of
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Anyway, whichever the name I call for seconds (or comments: if this proposed
amendment is considered harmful, let me know).
Received (well, found in the middle of a mail thread, thanks for
changing the subject though :P) and
Joey == Joey Hess jo...@debian.org writes:
Joey Charles Plessy wrote:
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when
proposing General Resolutions, as the GR process may be
Le Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 05:31:28PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs a écrit :
Charles Plessy:
This is why I am proposing this amendement, to say: “this GR was a bad idea,
please do not do it again”.
I would not regard it as an amendment, but as a separate alternative option
on the ballot. If I
Hi Charles,
On 19/10/14 at 23:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 05:31:28PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs a écrit :
Charles Plessy:
This is why I am proposing this amendement, to say: “this GR was a bad
idea,
please do not do it again”.
I would not regard it
Hi,
Charles Plessy:
---
The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
the vote.
Regarding the subject of
19 matches
Mail list logo
