On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 09:06:18PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:52:20 +0200, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:54:53AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:45:56AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Anyway, I'm
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:11:29 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 09:06:18PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:52:20 +0200, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Regardless of what person is in charge, I think this person should
_only_ be
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:54:53AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:45:56AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Anyway, I'm likely to second the proposal that comes out of this draft.
Just for the reference, I'm inclined to change it into something like Debian
reaffirms
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
IMHO having a GR for this is wrong -- what goes into a release is the
business of the Release Manager. However, as there is already a proposal on
this, there should also be a counter-proposal for those who disagree.
I understand what you're trying to do, but I think
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:25:26AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
The following is a draft for an amendment to the latest GR; I'd appreciate
comments on it before eventually proposing it:
===
I hereby propose an amendment to the current GR proposal Release sarge
with amd64:
The
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:54:53AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:45:56AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Anyway, I'm likely to second the proposal that comes out of this draft.
Just for the reference, I'm inclined to change it into something like Debian
reaffirms
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:52:20 +0200, Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:54:53AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:45:56AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Anyway, I'm likely to second the proposal that comes out of this
draft.
Just for
The following is a draft for an amendment to the latest GR; I'd appreciate
comments on it before eventually proposing it:
===
I hereby propose an amendment to the current GR proposal Release sarge
with amd64:
The Debian project hereby resolves,
That we will not include further
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:25:26AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
The following is a draft for an amendment to the latest GR; I'd appreciate
comments on it before eventually proposing it:
===
I hereby propose an amendment to the current GR proposal Release sarge
with amd64:
The
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:38:47AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:25:26AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
The following is a draft for an amendment to the latest GR; I'd appreciate
^
Erm, shit. =)
Anyway, I'm likely to second the proposal
On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 00:25 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I hereby propose an amendment to the current GR proposal Release sarge
with amd64:
The Debian project hereby resolves,
That we will not include further architectures for the next Debian release
(codenamed 'sarge'),
11 matches
Mail list logo
