On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 06:07:14PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Under A.2 Calling for a vote, change item 2 to read
^^
2. The proposer or any sponsor of a resolution may call for a vote on that
resolution and all related amendments.
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
c. If a supermajority of S:1 is required for A, it's majority ratio
is S, otherwise it's majority ratio is 1.
s/it's/its/! I think I mentioned this last time too...
RATIONALE: Options which the voters rank above the default
Hi folks,
Lets get the ball rolling on the other GR's that we have
pending. There are two things I'd like to do, in case Raul and aj
don't preempt me ;-).
a) test the non secret vote code path in the vote engine. There have
been some additions in the voting engine, namely,
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:55:52AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
Ah, I think this might interact very badly with super majorities. Or
at least it seems important to educate the voters that they really
want to rank default above accept if they vote for reject.
At least we have the following
Anthony == Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
Anthony On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 05:38:36PM -0500, Buddha Buck
Anthony wrote:
Sam Hartman wrote: Would the two options on the ballot be my
GR and a default option of more discussion? I think that,
under the proposal
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 01:55:52AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
Ah, I think this might interact very badly with super majorities. Or
at least it seems important to educate the voters that they really
want to rank default above accept if they vote for reject.
At least we have the following
Would someone mind giving me a few examples of how this works in practice?
Let's say I propose a GR and get seconds and it comes to a vote with
no amendments.
Would the two options on the ballot be my GR and a default option of
more discussion?
I realize this is a simplistic example; my actual
Would someone mind giving me a few examples of how this works in practice?
Let's say I propose a GR and get seconds and it comes to a vote with
no amendments.
Would the two options on the ballot be my GR and a default option of
more discussion?
I realize this is a simplistic example; my actual
Sam Hartman wrote:
Would someone mind giving me a few examples of how this works in practice?
Let's say I propose a GR and get seconds and it comes to a vote with
no amendments.
Would the two options on the ballot be my GR and a default option of
more discussion?
I think that, under the
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 05:38:36PM -0500, Buddha Buck wrote:
Sam Hartman wrote:
Would the two options on the ballot be my GR and a default option of
more discussion?
I think that, under the proposal as made, this is correct.
Yes.
When this has been brought up in the past, I believe that
Hi Folks,
I did not see any changes proposed to the last draft posted,
so here is that version. We have been discussion this for several
months now (seems like a decade or so ;-); I suggest that unless
there are major and/or widespread objections, we treat this as a GR
proposal and
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
c. If a supermajority of S:1 is required for A, it's majority ratio
is S, otherwise it's majority ratio is 1.
Grammar nits: s/it\'s/its/; s/, otherwise/; otherwise,/
RATIONALE: Options which the voters rank above the default
Hi Folks,
I did not see any changes proposed to the last draft posted,
so here is that version. We have been discussion this for several
months now (seems like a decade or so ;-); I suggest that unless
there are major and/or widespread objections, we treat this as a GR
proposal and
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
c. If a supermajority of S:1 is required for A, it's majority ratio
is S, otherwise it's majority ratio is 1.
Grammar nits: s/it\'s/its/; s/, otherwise/; otherwise,/
RATIONALE: Options which the voters rank above the default
14 matches
Mail list logo
