On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 10:27:28PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is a draft that modifies proposal A in a minor way,
So any chance we could get some more progress on this?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save
Shouldn't this include a No option as well as Further Discussion?
no to what ? hehe.. i guess no 's kinda attitude, eh? ;)
never mind,
oh, yes, :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
pgpjJFYe5vjS5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
A suggested ballot for the secretary to consider is:
- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
[ ] YES to proposal A: Foundation + issue/modify/withdraw
Amend the constitution to introduce Foundation
John == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John I'm talking about tm, which Gnus used previously, and was a lot
John better that whatever it is that it uses now.
Check your facts. Gnus never used tm, though you may have. The
tm folks are now producing semi-gnus, and you should
"John" == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Yeah, I ran into the same GNUS bug that someone else did -- namely
John that it blindly deletes PGPMIME parts from a message, making it look
John like there was no sig...
Gnus does not yet supprt PGPMIME. It may in the future.
]
I'm talking about tm, which Gnus used previously, and was a lot
better that whatever it is that it uses now.
-- John
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"John" == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Yeah, I ran into the same GNUS bug that someone else did -- namely
John
"John" == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John I'm talking about tm, which Gnus used previously, and was a lot
John better that whatever it is that it uses now.
Check your facts. Gnus never used tm, though you may have. The
tm folks are now producing semi-gnus, and you should
I'm talking about tm, which Gnus used previously, and was a lot
better that whatever it is that it uses now.
-- John
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Yeah, I ran into the same GNUS bug that someone else did -- namely
John that
John == John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Yeah, I ran into the same GNUS bug that someone else did -- namely
John that it blindly deletes PGPMIME parts from a message, making it look
John like there was no sig...
Gnus does not yet supprt PGPMIME. It may in the future.
]
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I second Branden's proposal.
But unsigned, so it just doesn't count.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:29:23PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I second Branden's proposal.
But unsigned, so it just doesn't count.
Please check your mailer. When it left my exim queue, it was signed.
Dan
I Second this
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:05:55AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
==
4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
4.1. Powers
Together, the Developers may:
1. Appoint or recall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I repeat my original second to this proposal.
Bob
__
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
Branden
I thought I'd respond to some of this just as a way of clarifying my
thinking...
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* This proposal was originally made to debian-project on 19 July, but
according to http://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal, the current
Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I formally second this proposal.
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* This proposal was originally made to debian-project on 19 July, but
according to http://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal, the current
Project Secretary refuses
Yeah, I ran into the same GNUS bug that someone else did -- namely
that it blindly deletes PGPMIME parts from a message, making it look
like there was no sig...
Sigh. Its older MIME handling was a lot better.
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:30:40PM
* This proposal was originally made to debian-project on 19 July, but
according to http://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal, the current
Project Secretary refuses to recognizes Proposed General Resolutions sent
to any list other than debian-project.
* I have been told, secondhand, that the
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:05:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
according to http://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal, the current
Project Secretary refuses to recognizes Proposed General Resolutions sent
to any list other than debian-project.
^^
I second Branden's proposal.
Dan
/\ /\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I second Branden's proposal.
But unsigned, so it just doesn't count.
I second Branden's proposal.
--
Stevie Strickland| 325912 Georgia Tech Station
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Georgia Institute of Technology
http://kelewan.debian.net/~sstrickl | Atlanta, GA 30332
Official Debian GNU/Linux Developer | CS 2130 TA
pgpmToEeQ2aCj.pgp
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:29:23PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I second Branden's proposal.
But unsigned, so it just doesn't count.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue Oct 10 19:40:01 2000) --]
I Second this
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:05:55AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
==
4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
4.1. Powers
Together, the Developers may:
1. Appoint or recall
Hi,
I am sponsoring this proposal with Message ID
[EMAIL PROTECTED].
Marcus
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:05:55AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
==
4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
4.1. Powers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I repeat my original second to this proposal.
Bob
__
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
Branden
I thought I'd respond to some of this just as a way of clarifying my
thinking...
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* This proposal was originally made to debian-project on 19 July, but
according to http://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal, the current
Project Secretary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I formally second this proposal.
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* This proposal was originally made to debian-project on 19 July, but
according to http://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal, the current
Project Secretary refuses
Please remember to GPG-sign your seconds!
Stevie Strickland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I second Branden's proposal.
--
Stevie Strickland| 325912 Georgia Tech Station
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Georgia Institute of Technology
http://kelewan.debian.net/~sstrickl
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:30:40PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
Please remember to GPG-sign your seconds!
Stevie Strickland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He did. Looked like a valid RFC 2015 message to me and mutt, at least...
--
G. Branden Robinson | I came, I saw, she
Yeah, I ran into the same GNUS bug that someone else did -- namely
that it blindly deletes PGPMIME parts from a message, making it look
like there was no sig...
Sigh. Its older MIME handling was a lot better.
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:30:40PM -0500,
30 matches
Mail list logo
