Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-10 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:25:44PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: So, the full position statement proposed is: THE DEBIAN PROJECT: 1. reaffirms its dedication to providing a 100% free system to our users according to

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-10 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:20:06AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:25:44PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: So, the full position statement proposed is: THE DEBIAN PROJECT: 1. reaffirms its

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-10 Thread Julien BLACHE
Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've tried to consolidate all the little I would second this if and remarks that people made (and I agree to), but that MJ Ray didn't outright reject. How about something like that? Would in particular MJ Raj, Sven Luther, Julien Blache agree

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-09 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:53:00PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why do you mention the admin section of the non-free archive ? I mean, sections are mostly obsolet with the new pool structure, and it is not clear what is meant here. I mean packages with a Section:

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-08 Thread Nathanael Nerode
MJ Ray wrote: So, the full position statement proposed is: THE DEBIAN PROJECT: 1. reaffirms its dedication to providing a 100% free system to our users according to our Social Contract and the DFSG; and

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-06 Thread MJ Ray
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Le mardi 05 septembre 2006 =E0 17:28 -0400, Joey Hess a =E9crit : AIUI, I would word your proposal something like this: =20 3. as a special exception to help users who have vital hardware without free firmware, the Debian installation media images may

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-06 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would otherwise support a similar amendment, but I in this form I consider it harmful to our cause. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prove it. I should prove that Debian distributing illegal proprietary kernel drivers would really be a bad idea? No, prove that you would

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-06 Thread MJ Ray
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, prove that you would otherwise support a similar amendment. I am not sure how this can be done. [...] By putting one forward, for example. Actions, not hollow promises. After all, my proposal is essentially a new archive

Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread MJ Ray
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is my (slightly rushed) write-up of a non-free-hw compromise option. Please second it if you think it should appear on the vote. This amendment to [EMAIL PROTECTED] removes the rationale and therefore, replaces authors in point 2 with

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:25:44PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, i think we are going to have too many options on that ballot, i think we should do some rationalizing at some point, and keep only a few which will represent most opinions, and work on

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread Julien BLACHE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (MJ Ray) wrote: Hi, 3. as a special exception to help users who have vital hardware ^ without free software drivers yet, the Debian system and official CD We'll soon have a 200+ posts sub-thread trying

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread MJ Ray
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, i think we are going to have too many options on that ballot, i think we should do some rationalizing at some point, and keep only a few which will represent most opinions, and work on polishing their wordings instead of everyone proposing their pet

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread MJ Ray
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MJ Ray) wrote: 3. as a special exception to help users who have vital hardware ^ without free software drivers yet, the

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:53:00PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, i think we are going to have too many options on that ballot, i think we should do some rationalizing at some point, and keep only a few which will represent most opinions, and work on polishing

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread Julien BLACHE
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, 3. as a special exception to help users who have vital hardware ^ without free software drivers yet, the Debian system and official CD We'll soon have a 200+ posts sub-thread trying

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:53:00PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, i think we are going to have too many options on that ballot, i think we should do some rationalizing at some point, and keep only a few which will represent most opinions, and work on polishing

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. as a special exception to help users who have vital hardware without free software drivers yet, the Debian system and official CD images may include hardware-support packages from the admin section of the non-free archive area which conform to all Debian

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread Joey Hess
MJ Ray wrote: 3. as a special exception to help users who have vital hardware without free software drivers yet, the Debian system and official CD images may include hardware-support packages from the admin section of the non-free archive area which conform to all Debian Free

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread MJ Ray
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] MJ Ray wrote: 3. as a special exception to help users who have vital hardware without free software drivers yet, the Debian system and official CD images may include hardware-support packages from the admin section of the non-free archive area which

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread MJ Ray
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the non-free archive area which conform to all Debian Free Software Guidelines except guideline 2 (Source Code), or an archive section/area with equivalent requirements. This may include proprietary kernel drivers and will exclude

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread Joey Hess
MJ Ray wrote: Apart from maybe possibly getting the wrong section, I think all of those so-called 'serious flaws' are based on misreading the proposal. It certianly seems to be based on us having different defintions of terms including the Debian system and drivers. AIUI, I would word your

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This may include proprietary kernel drivers and will exclude important firmwares which are not legally modifiable. Both too much and too little at the same time. How would you exclude proprietary kernel drivers while allowing important firmwares which are not legally

Re: Proposal - Amendment - allow hardware support from non-free into the debian system

2006-09-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 05 septembre 2006 à 17:28 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : AIUI, I would word your proposal something like this: 3. as a special exception to help users who have vital hardware without free firmware, the Debian installation media images may include selected firmware from non-free