Hello DPL candidate who signed the Vancouver plan,
(Excluding Anthony Towns who signed as (ftpmaster) not as (DPL
candidate).)
The Vancouver plan has several mention of the security team which lead
to believe it was accomodated to address the concern of this team.
However [EMAIL PROTECTED] shows
Bill Allombert wrote:
The Vancouver plan has several mention of the security team which lead
to believe it was accomodated to address the concern of this team.
However [EMAIL PROTECTED] shows that
the security team was not consulted and the most active security officer
does not endorse the
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
The Vancouver plan has several mention of the security team which lead
to believe it was accomodated to address the concern of this team.
[...]
Er, let's quote every mention of security in Steve's mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~wget -q -O -
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The interesting question still is: Do the DPL candidates think it is in
order that such a plan is designed without consulting the security team?
Did they know it wasn't consulted? etc.
I think various people that should have been consulted weren't, and I
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:58:42PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right with counting words, and Bill is wrong when he says the
team was mentioned several times. But since there was no rationale
for the criteria put on release arches, people tried to
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:53:55PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Did you sign on the assumption it has been reviewed by the security team,
or did you know they had not been consulted ? Did you make some
investigations ?
Joey was invited to the meeting but could not make it. He was on
the list
Forwarded to the list at Andreas' request.
---BeginMessage---
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:48:32PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
So this isn't really a James Troup question, it's a question of how
much screw-up is necessary before a delegation should be yanked?
This depends on many
Bill Allombert wrote:
Hello DPL candidate who signed the Vancouver plan,
(Excluding Anthony Towns who signed as (ftpmaster) not as (DPL
candidate).)
No, I signed it as Anthony Towns, and left it up to Steve to work out
which hat or hats he wanted to classify that under. (Well, actually I
didn't
8 matches
Mail list logo
