On 2004-03-03 15:46:59 + Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should this
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-04 10:15]:
Additionally, I asked how much longer you think this discussion
should be given before taking further action. For example, is
tagging FDL-caused bugs release-ignore for the next four years
acceptable?
In July last year, I was asked by some
On 2004-03-03 15:46:59 + Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should this
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-04 10:15]:
Additionally, I asked how much longer you think this discussion
should be given before taking further action. For example, is
tagging FDL-caused bugs release-ignore for the next four years
acceptable?
In July last year, I was asked by some
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 17:13]:
Has all this talking resulted in even an iota of concrete movement
on the official FSF position? Have there been any real promises
made that there is indeed going to be a change, from hte powers
that be in the FSF? Is there anything solid we can
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should this discussion be given? What would
they do to see more FDL-caused bugs in
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:46:59 +, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 10:29]:
Has all this talking resulted in even an iota of concrete
movement on the official FSF position? Have there been any real
promises made that there is indeed going to be a change, from hte
powers that be in the FSF? Is there
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:29:39 -0600
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should
On 2004-03-03 07:12:40 + Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
However, I'm sympathetic to RMS having been injured, and I'm
sympathetic
to Eben Moglen having to work overtime to counter the outrageous FUD
and
untruths being spewed by SCO and its shadowy partners.
Hrm, emails like
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:46:59 +, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 10:29]:
Has all this talking resulted in even an iota of concrete
movement on the official FSF position? Have there been any real
promises made that there is indeed going to be a change, from hte
powers that be in the FSF? Is there
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:29:39 -0600
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should
13 matches
Mail list logo
