On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 06:34:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Hmm, I have the ballot (3341) that I sent in on Dec 14th right here. I
have logs indicating it got to master[1] half an hour before deadline. I
see I got an ACK for the other ballot, sent at the same time, but not
for this one.
snip
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:54:30PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
On Tue Dec 16 06:55, Anthony Towns wrote:
Of the various people involved in the topic, many voted in ways you
(or at least I) mightn't expect.
...
Matthew Johnson - voted for implementation
I'm not too surprised by this.
aj wrote:
Joey Hess
Hmm, I have the ballot (3341) that I sent in on Dec 14th right here. I
have logs indicating it got to master[1] half an hour before deadline. I
see I got an ACK for the other ballot, sent at the same time, but not
for this one.
Anyway, it's always interesting to
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
devo...@vote.debian.org devo...@vote.debian.org (15/12/2008):
digraph Results {
ranksep=0.25;
Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or consensus.\n4.49 [
style=filled , fontname=Helvetica, fontsize=10 ];
Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or consensus.\n4.49 -
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:22:06PM +, devo...@vote.debian.org wrote:
The winners are:
Option 2 Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or consensus,
leading to a new proposal.
which, aiui was the original resolution, namely:
The Debian Project recognizes that many
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:55:22AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
Of the various people involved in the topic, many voted in ways you
(or at least I) mightn't expect.
[...]
Jurij Smakov - voted the amendment over the original resolution
Not sure how it became an amendment, but option 1
On 16/12/08 at 06:55 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:22:06PM +, devo...@vote.debian.org wrote:
The winners are:
Option 2 Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or consensus,
leading to a new proposal.
which, aiui was the original resolution,
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
Thank you for the detailed analysis.
You missed one point:
Excluding votes where more than one
option were ranked first, and counting only first choices, we get the
following results:
Option 1: 93
Option 2: 90
Option 3: 61
Option 4: 12
On Tue Dec 16 06:55, Anthony Towns wrote:
Of the various people involved in the topic, many voted in ways you
(or at least I) mightn't expect.
...
Matthew Johnson - voted for implementation
I'm not too surprised by this. I think it's entirely logically
consistent to second something then
On 15/12/08 at 15:28 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
Thank you for the detailed analysis.
You missed one point:
Excluding votes where more than one
option were ranked first, and counting only first choices, we get the
following results:
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
On 15/12/08 at 15:28 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I suspect this is because the obvious please, dear deity, stop talking
about things constantly and just do them vote ranks 3 above 2 above 1,
so I doubt many votes transferred from 3 to 1 when 3
12 matches
Mail list logo
