On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:41:08PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:55:35PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Craig Sanders wrote:
the DFSG also allows that the modification may be by patch only.
No, it does not.
yes it does.
Quoting DFSG 4, with emphasis
you people love to recycle the same lies over and over and over again.
i'm becoming convinced that it is a deliberate strategy - repeat the
same lies and eventually everyone will just give up out of exhaustion.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:42:44PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
3a only says that a
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:42:44PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
3a only says that a binary has to be *accompanied* with the source code.
Hence it can be on a separate medium. So you can distribute your 1KB
chip, stapled to a CD-ROM that contains the
Craig Sanders wrote:
the DFSG also allows that the modification may be by patch only.
No, it does not.
Quoting DFSG 4, with emphasis added:
The license may restrict source-code from being distributed
in modified form _only_ if the license allows the distribution
of patch files with the
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:38:57 +1100, Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
the GFDL has a similar provision. you can provide a link to an
internet address containing the full document.
Please show me where the GFDL has such a provision. The passage that
i've shown it before. i have no
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:55:35PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Craig Sanders wrote:
the DFSG also allows that the modification may be by patch only.
No, it does not.
yes it does.
Quoting DFSG 4, with emphasis added:
The license may restrict source-code from being distributed
in
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:07:48PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:38:57 +1100, Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
the GFDL has a similar provision. you can provide a link to an
internet address containing the full document.
Please show me where the GFDL has such a
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:06:09 +1100, Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:07:48PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
You made the assertion that it was sufficient to just include a link
to the full document (including invariant sections) or to just the
invariant sections
Craig Sanders wrote:
The license may restrict source-code from being distributed
in modified form _only_ if the license allows the distribution
of patch files with the source code for the purpose of modifying
the program at build time. THE LICENSE MUST EXPLICITLY PERMIT
DISTRIBUTION OF SOFTWARE
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:41:08PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:55:35PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Craig Sanders wrote:
the DFSG also allows that the modification may be by patch only.
No, it does not.
yes it does.
Quoting DFSG 4, with emphasis
10 matches
Mail list logo
