Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
If I remember how my script works well enough to use it correctly,
the clone candidates (ones that a lot of voters rank next to each other)
were:
326 votes (77%), Ari and Ted
That's very unfair to Zeke.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
That's not really legitimate STV since when a vote ranks two candidates
equally I count it towards both totals, which is why 231+237 = 468 which
is more than the total number of votes (421), but it's the best we can
do, I think.
Nah, here are the
Some quick analysis of the tally sheet:
First preference votes:
152 Anthony
122 Steve
75 Andreas
70 Jeroen
48 Bill
9 Ari
4 Ted
14 NOTA
(that counts 48 votes that ranked two or more options equal first
multiple times)
Using STV (aka IRV, which .au uses
Anthony Towns wrote:
So, by the looks of things, we get the same result with either
American-style voting (only the first ranked candidate counts)
Actually, by American-style voting, several of the candidates would have
needed to band together to geta bigger share of the votes, with the ones
Anthony == Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
[...]
Anthony Another interesting question, especially given we had two
Anthony candidates who were planning on working together to lead Debian
Anthony should either be elected, is how closely together candidates
Anthony were ranked. If
5 matches
Mail list logo
