On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:48:18AM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I overlooked this the first time, but
>
> On 2024-03-29 16:03, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > FYI, if I didn't go forward with the project, that we've been discussing
> > with Jonathan over at least 3 years, is
Hi Thomas,
I overlooked this the first time, but
On 2024-03-29 16:03, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> FYI, if I didn't go forward with the project, that we've been discussing
> with Jonathan over at least 3 years, is because I have no idea where to
> host it. I have clearly stated that having this
On 2024/04/10 16:08, Felix Lechner wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:57:55 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
every single hardware request over the last 4 years (whether from DSA
or from a DD) has been approved.
Mine wasn't, although I probably didn't follow the proper procedure. I
just wrote a
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:57:55 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> every single hardware request over the last 4 years (whether from DSA
> or from a DD) has been approved.
Mine wasn't, although I probably didn't follow the proper procedure. I
just wrote a private email to Jonathan. His response
Hi,
now that the campaign period has ended, I will write my longer answer on
-devel where it belongs.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:38:34PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 05:53:46PM +0200 schrieb Marc Haber:
> > I think this can't just be seen by looking at the statistiks.
Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 10:14:59AM -0700 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
> On Thursday, April 4, 2024 5:32:45 AM MST Andreas Tille wrote:
> >[ ] Its not acceptable, don't do that
> >[ ] We should discuss this on debian-devel, possibly do some GR
> >before things like this are permitted
> >
Hi again,
Am Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 09:26:25AM +0200 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> > I want to be able to immediately respond to future problems in this
> > package. I'm fine with putting Debian Med team as maintainer, but not
> > my personal ID (maximum as Uploader since I do not have any personal
> >
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:37:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 07:59:56PM +0200 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> >
> > There is the possilbity to salavage the packagei [1], but that of course
> > will
> > only work if the person agrees to take over maintainance
Hi Holger,
Am Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 10:42:35AM + schrieb Holger Levsen:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:26:03PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > also: (NMU-)uploads to DELAYED/15 are great.
> > Sorry, I do not feel my time well spent on just curing a symptom
> > (unfixed RC bug) via NMU instead
Hi Santiago,
Am Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:21:48PM -0300 schrieb santiago:
> ...
> Non-commercial FLOSS products/projects do not have to comply with CRA.
> However, I think there could be an impact in the industry regarding the
> adoption and use of Debian.
>
> What are you thoughts on the subject?
> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk writes:
Adrian> If I send an email requesting all data Debian has about me to
Adrian> data-protect...@debian.org, will I receive a complete reply within
the
Adrian> expected time, including all data members of delegations like the
Adrian> Debian
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 04:38:57PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Andreas,
> Am Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:41:17AM +0300 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
>...
> > Many parts of Debians Privacy Policy look questionable.
> >
> > For example the rights are not stated, and in addition to this being a
On 05/04/24 23:51, santiago wrote:
Dear DPL candidates,
As you may be aware, the EU has adopted a new cybersecurity regulation
[CRA] and other countries are following the example. You may also be
aware that Debian issued a public statement about it (based on a
previous draft version of the
On 03/04/24 01:35, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
Hello!
Jonathan's latest "Bits from the DPL" entry reminded me of how much I
like those :)
I also like reading them.
What are your thoughts on the format?
I like the format, but sometimes it becomes too long that I end up not
finishing
Dear DPL candidates,
As you may be aware, the EU has adopted a new cybersecurity regulation
[CRA] and other countries are following the example. You may also be
aware that Debian issued a public statement about it (based on a
previous draft version of the regulation) last year.
CRA will have an
On 05/04/24 03:11, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi,
this email has two parts:
A short question where I would appreciate a "yes" or "no" answer from
all candidates, and a longer explanation what and why I am asking.
Question:
If elected, will you commit to have a lawyer specialized in that area
review
On 03/04/24 01:42, Marc Haber wrote:
Dear Candidates,
There are many people who see Debian as a technology project, with the
technical goal of producing The Universal Operating System.
I believe that Debian is both a technology project and a community.
What are you planning to do to Debian
Hi Scott,
Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:12:45PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> On April 4, 2024 12:59:34 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >I would like to learn what options I have to realise paragraph
> >
> > Packaging standards
> >
> >of my platform.
>
> Obviously the DPL has an outsized voice
Hi Adrian,
Am Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:41:17AM +0300 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> this email has two parts:
> A short question where I would appreciate a "yes" or "no" answer from
> all candidates, and a longer explanation what and why I am asking.
>
>
> Question:
>
> If elected, will you commit to
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 11:18, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:41:00PM +0100 schrieb Luca Boccassi:
> > > Please don't get me wrong: I do not consider Fedora a commercial
> > > entity. I simply subscribe the statement that we are facing some
> > > problems in Debian since we
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:26:03PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > also: (NMU-)uploads to DELAYED/15 are great.
> Sorry, I do not feel my time well spent on just curing a symptom
> (unfixed RC bug) via NMU instead of addressing the underlying cause
> that the package is maintained by a single
Hi Tobias,
Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 07:59:56PM +0200 schrieb Tobias Frost:
>
> There is the possilbity to salavage the packagei [1], but that of course will
> only work if the person agrees to take over maintainance and add their name to
> Uploaders: or Maintainer: [2].
I want to be able to
Am Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 09:55:56AM + schrieb Holger Levsen:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:32:45PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > [...] I could follow the normal NMU procedure but I do not consider
> > this a sustainable solution.
> [...]
> > I did not uploaded my work but I would like to
Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:41:00PM +0100 schrieb Luca Boccassi:
> > Please don't get me wrong: I do not consider Fedora a commercial
> > entity. I simply subscribe the statement that we are facing some
> > problems in Debian since we are not a commercial entity.
>
> I think the framing is
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:32:45PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [...] I could follow the normal NMU procedure but I do not consider
> this a sustainable solution.
[...]
> I did not uploaded my work but I would like to know what action is
> considered acceptable by the voters. I repeat that
Hi,
Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 09:55:33PM +0100 schrieb Luca Boccassi:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 21:30, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> >
> > > In practical terms, it would probably be made easier if it was
> > > mandatory for all packages to be on Salsa, either in the 'debian'
> > > namespace or in a team
Hi,
this email has two parts:
A short question where I would appreciate a "yes" or "no" answer from
all candidates, and a longer explanation what and why I am asking.
Question:
If elected, will you commit to have a lawyer specialized in that area
review policies and practices around handling
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 21:30, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
>
> > In practical terms, it would probably be made easier if it was
> > mandatory for all packages to be on Salsa, either in the 'debian'
> > namespace or in a team namespace (but not under individual users).
>
> Realistically, even if you
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:32:45PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the light of the previous discussion I have a question to all voters.
> Due to bug #1066377 more than 30 testing removal warnings hit my mailbox
> today (I stopped counting after 30). While the Debian Med
On Thursday, April 4, 2024 5:32:45 AM MST Andreas Tille wrote:
>[ ] Its not acceptable, don't do that
>[ ] We should discuss this on debian-devel, possibly do some GR
>before things like this are permitted
>[ ] Wait one week before uploading
>[X] Wait one day before
Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:04:49PM + schrieb Holger Levsen:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:59:34PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I would like to learn what options I have to realise paragraph
> >Packaging standards
> > of my platform.
>
> I also think this feels a bit like abusing the
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:32:45PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>[ ] Its not acceptable, don't do that
>[ ] We should discuss this on debian-devel, possibly do some GR
>before things like this are permitted
>[ ] Wait one week before uploading
>[X] Wait one day before
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 13:40, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:47:11PM +0100 schrieb Luca Boccassi:
> > > > That's the price we currently pay for being not a commercial entity,
> > >
> > > I fully subscribe to this statement.
> >
> > I don't think commercial
On April 4, 2024 12:59:34 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi Scott,
>
>Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:42:11PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman:
>> I'm interested to understand what you think this has to do with the DPL
>> election or the role of the DPL within the project?
>
>I would like to learn
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:59:34PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I would like to learn what options I have to realise paragraph
>Packaging standards
> of my platform.
I also think this feels a bit like abusing the election audience for a
topic which should be discussed on -devel outside
Hi Scott,
Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:42:11PM + schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> I'm interested to understand what you think this has to do with the DPL
> election or the role of the DPL within the project?
I would like to learn what options I have to realise paragraph
Packaging standards
of
On April 4, 2024 12:32:45 PM UTC, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi,
>
>in the light of the previous discussion I have a question to all voters.
>Due to bug #1066377 more than 30 testing removal warnings hit my mailbox
>today (I stopped counting after 30). While the Debian Med package
>clustalo is the
Hi Luca,
Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:47:11PM +0100 schrieb Luca Boccassi:
> > As far as I know other major distributions do not undertake the time_t
> > 64bit transition (whether this marks leadership or not is questionable
> > but it will make us the leading distribution on those architectures in
Hi,
in the light of the previous discussion I have a question to all voters.
Due to bug #1066377 more than 30 testing removal warnings hit my mailbox
today (I stopped counting after 30). While the Debian Med package
clustalo is the only package that's responsible for this due to its
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 11:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> Am Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 05:53:46PM +0200 schrieb Marc Haber:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:37:37AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > "we now use Wayland
> > instead of X11", "please don't create your system users with adduser and
>
Hi Marc,
Am Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 05:53:46PM +0200 schrieb Marc Haber:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:37:37AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I see a big problem that we do not follow common standards. While we
> > have some teams with strict policies setting those standards internally
> > to a
[snipped everything that I don't have an answer for. Neither removal nor
quoting is endorsement or reject of what Andreas said.]
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:37:37AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:12:56PM +0200 schrieb Marc Haber:
> > There are many people who see Debian
> "Andreas" == Andreas Tille writes:
Andreas> I was told in private that a daily log in Git might be a bit tough
but
Andreas> I hope to manage. I consider it a good preparation for the
monthly Bits.
I think I recall inheriting some infrastructure from Chris for
maintaining some
Hi Marc,
Am Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:12:56PM +0200 schrieb Marc Haber:
> There are many people who see Debian as a technology project, with the
> technical goal of producing The Universal Operating System.
>
> What are you planning to do to Debian from a technical and technological
> point of
Hi Lous-Philippe,
Am Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:05:21PM -0400 schrieb Louis-Philippe Véronneau:
> Jonathan's latest "Bits from the DPL" entry reminded me of how much I like
> those :)
>
> What are your thoughts on the format?
>
> If you are elected, do you plan to publish regular "Bits"? If not,
Dear Candidates,
There are many people who see Debian as a technology project, with the
technical goal of producing The Universal Operating System.
What are you planning to do to Debian from a technical and technological
point of view? What do we well, where do we suck on the technical site?
If
Hello!
Jonathan's latest "Bits from the DPL" entry reminded me of how much I
like those :)
What are your thoughts on the format?
If you are elected, do you plan to publish regular "Bits"? If not, how
do you plan to communicate with the rest of the project with regards to
the work you are
On 27/03/24 04:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
As you know, there's a large amount of money sleeping in SPI account
for Debian. Do you have ideas on how to spend it?
From Jonathan's mail, I think we do not have too much money unused now.
Would you be ok spending 100k USD on buying hardware
On 3/27/24 08:51, Andreas Tille wrote:
Would you be ok spending 100k USD on buying hardware for a new Debian cloud,
for example? I've always volunteered to operate it for Debian, but it never
went through, because I haven't spent time to find where to host it and so
on, but highvoltage liked the
On 3/27/24 11:25, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
Hi,
Thomas Goirand wrote on 27/03/2024 at 00:24:30+0100:
Hi,
As you know, there's a large amount of money sleeping in SPI account
for Debian. Do you have ideas on how to spend it?
Would you be ok spending 100k USD on buying hardware for a new
Hi!
On 2024/03/27 12:25, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
Would you be ok spending 100k USD on buying hardware for a new Debian
cloud, for example? I've always volunteered to operate it for Debian,
but it never went through, because I haven't spent time to find where
to host it and so on, but
Hi,
Thomas Goirand wrote on 27/03/2024 at 00:24:30+0100:
> Hi,
>
> As you know, there's a large amount of money sleeping in SPI account
> for Debian. Do you have ideas on how to spend it?
>
> Would you be ok spending 100k USD on buying hardware for a new Debian
> cloud, for example? I've always
Hi Thomas,
Am Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:24:30AM +0100 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
> As you know, there's a large amount of money sleeping in SPI account for
> Debian. Do you have ideas on how to spend it?
While I admit that I'm not well informed about the status of the acount
currently I'm perfectly
Hi,
As you know, there's a large amount of money sleeping in SPI account for
Debian. Do you have ideas on how to spend it?
Would you be ok spending 100k USD on buying hardware for a new Debian
cloud, for example? I've always volunteered to operate it for Debian,
but it never went through,
Hi Felix,
It seems there's much more behind the scenes than I happen to know... So, with
the little context I have, I keep believing that your reimbursement request is
appropriate. And, for *just* not following the proper procedure, such a request
shouldn't be ultimately refused, IMO.
Bests,
--
he contact details of the controller is
mandatory for processing of personal data (Articles 13(1)(a) and 14(1)(a)),
failure to do so is subject to administrative fines of up to 20 Million Euro
(Article 83(5)(b)).
> This is just one of the things that, I think, would be a lot simpler if
>
Hi Adrian,
On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 23:48 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Will this handwritten note be available through
> contributors.debian.org?
>
> If the personal information in the handwritten note did not come
> directly from the person, who at Debian is responsible to ensure that
> the person
ouldn't
even determine which data protection authority has jurisdiction.
This is just one of the things that, I think, would be a lot simpler if
Debian would register as an organization, hence my question [1] to the
candidates.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2022/03/msg00135.html
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 09:25:46PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2022/04/01 20:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Would you commit to something more specific, like that our Data
> > Protection team will reply to debian-project within 3 months discussing
> > all issues mentioned in the discussion at
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 04:57:38PM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk writes:
> Adrian> Your "services" approach does not work for the non-trivial
> Adrian> cases where Debian might be a (joint) controller of personal
> Adrian> data.
>
> Adrian> The Debian
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 22:16:55 +0300
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> One option would be to outsource this work to our paid GDPR lawyer.
Is there any option to cooperate with other FLOSS organizations?
They would have the same issue and we may be able to share it and
costs ;)
--
Hideki Yamane
> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk writes:
Adrian> Your "services" approach does not work for the non-trivial
Adrian> cases where Debian might be a (joint) controller of personal
Adrian> data.
Adrian> The Debian Community Team promises confidentiality regarding
Adrian> personal
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 09:18:53PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Adrian Bunk
>
> > Who will fulfill the request within the legal limit of one month if
> > a person sends an email to data-protect...@debian.org asking whether
> > Debian is a (joint) controller of any data about this person,
On 2022/04/01 20:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Would you commit to something more specific, like that our Data
Protection team will reply to debian-project within 3 months discussing
all issues mentioned in the discussion at [1] so far, and with their
reply having been proof-read by our GDPR lawyer?
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 08:46:42PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Adrian Bunk
>
> > Would you commit to something more specific, like that our Data
> > Protection team will reply to debian-project within 3 months discussing
> > all issues mentioned in the discussion at [1] so far, and with
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:40:02PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>...
> This isn't the role of the data protection team, though, any more than
> owner@bugs is responsible for fixing all the bugs in all the packages.
> I'm quite happy to act as a redirector (as per the first part of the
>
]] Adrian Bunk
> Who will fulfill the request within the legal limit of one month if
> a person sends an email to data-protect...@debian.org asking whether
> Debian is a (joint) controller of any data about this person, and
> if yes requests a copy of all data?
To make this easier for services
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 09:28:53PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Would you commit to something more specific, like that our Data
> Protection team will reply to debian-project within 3 months discussing
> all issues mentioned in the discussion at [1] so far, and with their
> reply having been
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:02:15PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> Hi Adrian
Hi Jonathan,
>...
> I'm not sure bringing in the lawyer as a first step is optimal, they are
> expensive and will probably tell us a lot of things we already know. IMHO
> it's better to do some initial groundwork,
]] Adrian Bunk
> Would you commit to something more specific, like that our Data
> Protection team will reply to debian-project within 3 months discussing
> all issues mentioned in the discussion at [1] so far, and with their
> reply having been proof-read by our GDPR lawyer?
I don't think
]] Jonathan Carter
> So, I would appreciate it if the data protection team could look into
> all of the issues we know of in Debian, but I'd also like there to be
> a process where people can file issues with the data protection
> team. I'll admit I had to search a bit to find the
exceed the expectations of
these legislations around the world.
There seems to be a general agreement that privacy in Debian falls
short of the legal minimum requirements at least in the EU.
Even the exact scope of the problem is not clear.
Question to all candidates:
If elected, will you ask
Hi,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 23:08:41 +0300
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> If elected, will you ask our Data Protection team and our GDPR lawyer to
> jointly do a review of all handling of personal data in Debian regarding
> GDPR compliance,
Yes.
> and make the results of the review available to all
>
Hi Charles,
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 21:51:44 +0900
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I expect a term limit to increase rotation on the positions of power,
> with the following benefits:
>
> - reduce the risk of burn-out of the delegates,
>
> - motivate fresh people to have the ambition to serve in these
>
uirements at least in the EU.
>
> Even the exact scope of the problem is not clear.
>
> Question to all candidates:
>
> If elected, will you ask our Data Protection team and our GDPR lawyer to
> jointly do a review of all handling of personal data in Debian regarding
The discussion starting in [1] is about privacy in Debian with a focus
on the GDPR of the European Union.
There seems to be a general agreement that privacy in Debian falls
short of the legal minimum requirements at least in the EU.
Even the exact scope of the problem is not clear.
Question
On 2022/03/30 07:33, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 20:47 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
It furthermore seems that I did not follow the proper process when
filing my request, as Paul Wise pointed out.
My reference to the Hardware/Wanted wiki page was referring to the
procedure for after
On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 20:47 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> It furthermore seems that I did not follow the proper process when
> filing my request, as Paul Wise pointed out.
My reference to the Hardware/Wanted wiki page was referring to the
procedure for after you have bought hardware, no longer
Hi Tiago,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 11:09 AM Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
>
> Given that Jonathan, after lots of research as he describes in this
> thread, has stated that such request never reached him, can you clarify
> how can you have even complied to a request for more information from him?
>
Hi Ted,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 1:39 PM Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> I'll note that you spent a lot of time about how the council would
> appoint a chair and vice-chair, create bylaws, meet monthly, etc.
>
> However you didn't really answer the question regarding what the
> authorities that the
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 01:57:59PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:52 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > Interesting. What would be the composition, roles, duties of that
> > Strategy Council ?
>
> Like all committees and boards I envision, the Strategy
On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 18:34 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> One thing people have been really concerned about when asking for Debian
> to buy hardware is, is what happens to the hardware after they're done
> with it? So far I've just told them that they can try to pass it on to
> another DD
Hi Richard (2022.03.27_20:17:48_+)
> > The only cases of waste I know of happens when people ask for
> > sponsorship for DebConf and then hotel space is made for them (and
> > possibly other expenses) and then they just don't show up without any
> > heads-up. Even those are rare, but it's the
On 3/27/22 11:14, Jonathan Carter wrote:
The only cases of waste I know of happens when people ask for
sponsorship for DebConf and then hotel space is made for them (and
possibly other expenses) and then they just don't show up without any
heads-up. Even those are rare, but it's the only
Hi Felix,
On 2022-03-24 8:18 p.m., Felix Lechner wrote:
[...]
>
> For example, I requested $217 for a one-time SSD & RAM upgrade to help
> operate lintian.d.o in November of 2021. My request was not granted. I
> didn't even receive a response from Jonathan (other than a request for
> more
Hi Richard
On 2022/03/24 22:17, Richard Laager wrote:
The disbursements that I've heard about seem to be relatively "small
potatoes" things. Is there some huge wasteful spending occurring that
I've missed?
Most of it is small potatoes (typically less than $1000, typically for
hardware or
Hi Paul
On 2022/03/26 01:27, Paul Wise wrote:
We have these documents related to that:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL#Money
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL/AskingForMoney
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL/SponsoringGuidelines
These were written by Stefano Zacchiroli in 2010 when he was
On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 11:41 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> I still want to work towards having an expenditure policy,
...
> The idea would be that there's some clear document that makes it
> really easy for someone to know whether they can apply for something
> or not, and I think if it hits a
Hi Lucas
On 2022/03/17 17:54, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
As someone who used to care a lot about Debian, but who hasn't been able
to pay much attention to the project lately, I was wondering:
I don't think anyone would hold it against you that you've got busy with
other stuff, having a life
On 2022/03/25 11:41, Jonathan Carter wrote:
For example, I requested $217 for a one-time SSD & RAM upgrade to help
operate lintian.d.o in November of 2021. My request was not granted. I
didn't even receive a response from Jonathan (other than a request for
more information, with which I
Hi Felix
On 2022/03/25 02:18, Felix Lechner wrote:
For example, I requested $217 for a one-time SSD & RAM upgrade to help
operate lintian.d.o in November of 2021. My request was not granted. I
didn't even receive a response from Jonathan (other than a request for
more information, with which I
Hi Andy,
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:36 PM Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> We've had the Code of Conduct for about eight years now and the Community Team
> for about as long. There are still significant differences about how some
> people feel about them, despite the Code of Conduct having been
On 3/24/22 19:18, Felix Lechner wrote:
For example, I requested $217 for a one-time SSD & RAM upgrade to help
operate lintian.d.o in November of 2021. My request was not granted. I
didn't even receive a response from Jonathan (other than a request for
more information, with which I complied)
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 1:17 PM Richard Laager wrote:
>
> The disbursements that I've heard about seem to be relatively "small
> potatoes" things. Is there some huge wasteful spending occurring that
> I've missed?
I don't know. As an outside candidate, I received no confidential
On 3/24/22 15:45, Sam Hartman wrote:
"Richard" == Richard Laager writes:
Richard> On 3/20/22 07:10, Felix Lechner wrote:
>> If we accidentally formed a General Partnership, as has been
>> suggested elsewhere
Richard> Yes, that would be really dumb for a number of reasons.
> "Richard" == Richard Laager writes:
Richard> On 3/20/22 07:10, Felix Lechner wrote:
>> If we accidentally formed a General Partnership, as has been
>> suggested elsewhere
Richard> Yes, that would be really dumb for a number of reasons.
The problem is that at least in the
On 3/20/22 07:10, Felix Lechner wrote:
If we accidentally formed a General Partnership, as has been suggested
elsewhere
Yes, that would be really dumb for a number of reasons.
I have friends who are or were high-ranking officials at the UN. With
the project's permission, I might explore
On 3/20/22 11:58, Felix Lechner wrote:
I would not be comfortable granting
financial requests, other than on an emergency basis, without some
type of community review.
The disbursements that I've heard about seem to be relatively "small
potatoes" things. Is there some huge wasteful spending
On 20 March 2022 09:56:53 UTC, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 19:34:03 +
>"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
>> We've had the Code of Conduct for about eight years now and the Community
>> Team
>> for about as long. There are still significant differences about how some
>>
Le Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 04:27:49PM +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
>
> I'm sorry, but could you explain "what do you want to improve with
> a term limit"?
Good evening Hideki,
I expect a term limit to increase rotation on the positions of power,
with the following benefits:
- reduce the risk
1 - 100 of 1025 matches
Mail list logo
