What would you think of an implementation of supermajority which has
this same general characteristic? [I ask this because Anthony Town's
most recent implied draft presents an implementation of supermajority
with exactly this property.]
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 11:01:32AM +0100, Jochen
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:23:42AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 11:01:32AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
A = change the scoial contract and remove non-free
(Requires supermajority)
B = try to nurture and increase non-free
(Requires no supermajority)
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:23:42AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
Cases where the default option defeats another option are never the
weakest defeats.
Huh? Can you explain this to me? Why could this be true?
Confused,
Jochen
--
Omm
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:23:42AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
In other words, supermajority options are eliminated only when their
weakest defeats against schwartz set options are eliminated, and we have
a bias towards the default option in some (but not all)
Currently, I'm considering what I'm thinking of as Anthony Town's
proposal. By this, I mean:
__
quorum is number of submitted votes
supermajority multiplies vote counts for default option when comparing
with supermajority vote
On Nov 24, Branden Robinson wrote:
How do we know this would happen at all, let alone ad nauseum?
I can't prove that it *would* happen, but it's a definite
possibility.
A scenario: Assume controversial subject X arises and the developer
community is evenly split, pro/con. Vote #1 occurs. 6
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:23:42AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
In other words, supermajority options are eliminated only when their
weakest defeats against schwartz set options are eliminated, and we have
a bias towards the default option in some (but not all)
Currently, I'm considering what I'm thinking of as Anthony Town's
proposal. By this, I mean:
__
quorum is number of submitted votes
supermajority multiplies vote counts for default option when comparing
with supermajority vote
8 matches
Mail list logo
