El día 02 feb 2003, Branden Robinson escribía:
[Reply-To is set. This message is written with the intention of
soliciting private replies; however, if you want to reply to debian-vote
as well, go ahead.]
Hi folks,
Won't you publish the results of the survey?
Won't you run for DPL this
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:28:06PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
Hi,
This is the final day of the nomination period, which started
on 2003/01/24, and shall end on 2003/02/14 00:00:00 UTC. The
campaigning period shall start then. Voting shall start on March 7th
Sorry for coming in late:
On 05-Feb-03, 13:25 (CST), Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A.6 Vote Counting
2. If the ballot has a quorum requirement (Q) any options other
than the default option which do not receive at least Q votes
ranking that option above
Hi
This is the new version, with the input of people on the
list.
1
Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Re worded section 3 to when the outcome is no longer in doubt
2
Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A.3: Added quotes around Further
In article 20030213105818.C7247@yellowpig, Bill Allombert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it possible to have a list of people would have nominated
themselves available during the nomination period and not only
after ? Maybe on http://www.debian.org/vote/ ? This list maybe
important for
With this message, I declare my candidacy for the position of Debian
Project Leader in the forthcoming elections.
I'd like to extend my thanks to those who took the time to answer my
questionnaire, and to those who sent along words of encouragement,
urging me to run.
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:11:27AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
Won't you publish the results of the survey?
Yes; please see:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200302/msg6.html
Won't you run for DPL this year? (Deadline is today 00:00 UTC)
Yes, please see:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:52:26AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:05:42PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
It is possible to have an election where there is no casting vote. For
example, electing the chairman of the Technical Committee when the
current chairman is AWOL,
I believe most efficient way to get an effective election method it to
build up a set of essential criteria, and select a method that matches
those criteria. I found the criteria mentioned on electionmethods.org
too vague for me to understand, due to the use of the words 'sincerly'
and 'not
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:15:22AM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
The nomination period is at an end, with three candidates
standing forth to be counted. The candidates are:
o Moshe Zadka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o Martin Michlmayr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The nomination period is at an end, with three candidates
standing forth to be counted. The candidates are:
o Moshe Zadka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o
El día 02 feb 2003, Branden Robinson escribía:
[Reply-To is set. This message is written with the intention of
soliciting private replies; however, if you want to reply to debian-vote
as well, go ahead.]
Hi folks,
Won't you publish the results of the survey?
Won't you run for DPL this
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:28:06PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
Hi,
This is the final day of the nomination period, which started
on 2003/01/24, and shall end on 2003/02/14 00:00:00 UTC. The
campaigning period shall start then. Voting shall start on March 7th
Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:28:06PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
Hi,
This is the final day of the nomination period, which started
on 2003/01/24, and shall end on 2003/02/14 00:00:00 UTC. The
campaigning period shall start then. Voting shall
Sorry for coming in late:
On 05-Feb-03, 13:25 (CST), Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A.6 Vote Counting
2. If the ballot has a quorum requirement (Q) any options other
than the default option which do not receive at least Q votes
ranking that option above
Hi
This is the new version, with the input of people on the
list.
1
Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Re worded section 3 to when the outcome is no longer in doubt
2
Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A.3: Added quotes around Further
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it possible to have a list of people would have nominated
themselves available during the nomination period and not only
after ? Maybe on http://www.debian.org/vote/ ? This list maybe
important for hesitate to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Clinton Mead [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Regarding the Feburary 7th draft. Are the results this draft
produces equivalent to the results produced using this method?
(a) All voters tick an 'approved' box next to all options that
would
of been above the
Hi Manoj,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:28:09AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
is the new version, with the input of people on the list.
I'm happy with this, now. Thank you for your work,
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
With this message, I declare my candidacy for the position of Debian
Project Leader in the forthcoming elections.
I'd like to extend my thanks to those who took the time to answer my
questionnaire, and to those who sent along words of encouragement,
urging me to run.
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:52:26AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:05:42PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
It is possible to have an election where there is no casting vote. For
example, electing the chairman of the Technical Committee when the
current chairman is AWOL,
21 matches
Mail list logo
