On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:04:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Do people think that we should only supercede foundation
documents, and never modify them? I would not be averse to preserving
a historical record.
I think we should never modify them. It should be possible to
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:44:37AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:04:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Do people think that we should only supercede foundation
documents, and never modify them? I would not be averse to preserving
a historical record.
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, it was. I did include the supercession language later on
in the document, but forgot it at the top of clause 5.
This version also looks fine modulo one spelling nit: forms of
supersede are traditionally spelled with Ss, not Cs.
--
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:43:49PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 04:59, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi folks,
Here is my amended proposal, further changed by incorporating
Branden's suggestions. Would the sponsors of my proposal approve of
this changed wording?
Hi folks,
Here is my amended proposal, further changed by incorporating
Branden's suggestions. Would the sponsors of my proposal approve of
this changed wording? (New sponsors are also welcome for second this
modified proposal).
manoj
Seconded.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:59:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi folks,
Here is my amended proposal, further changed by incorporating
Branden's suggestions. Would the sponsors of my proposal approve of
this changed wording?
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:52:13 -0400, Simon Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:59:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Here is my amended proposal, further changed by incorporating
Branden's suggestions. Would the sponsors of my proposal approve of
this changed
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:44:37AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:04:28AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Do people think that we should only supercede foundation
documents, and never modify them? I would not be averse to preserving
a historical record.
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 04:59, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi folks,
Here is my amended proposal, further changed by incorporating
Branden's suggestions. Would the sponsors of my proposal approve of
this changed wording? (New sponsors are also welcome for second this
modified proposal).
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 07:43:49PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 04:59, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi folks,
Here is my amended proposal, further changed by incorporating
Branden's suggestions. Would the sponsors of my proposal approve of
this changed wording?
10 matches
Mail list logo