On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 12:45:53AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
This summary is completely wrong for any Condorcet scheme.
Ok...
By definition, any member of the smith set is a plausible winner of
a vote. So there's no way to show an implausible winner, if we've
restricted the discussion to
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 03:17:05AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:07:26AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
"Status-quo" means don't resolve *anything*. There are at most two
ways of doing that: by doing nothing, and not even discussing the
matter again, and by doing
2 matches
Mail list logo
