Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you want to select one person, and leave the rest equally, you
could put a 1 for the person (or thing) you like, and mark the
rest as 2.
[...]
unacceptable blank. Start with 1, don't skip any numbers, don't
repeat. To vote no,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:07:20PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
You can't have it both ways! The standard Debian answer to a good
idea is 'show us the code'. Well, in this case, the code was written
and demonstrated. It would obviously not be difficult to integrate it
with the
Previously tony mancill wrote:
I'm not sure if there's any point in the casual security. I seem to
recall all of the votes from last year's election being published in some
public place after the voting was complete.
Which was a mistake, DPL votes are not public (see the constitution).
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:06:10AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I just want to remind everyone about how this voting works under the
hood. You are better off not leaving options blank, for the simple
reason that leaving it blank means your vote does not count against that
option (the things you
Hi,
The script behind [EMAIL PROTECTED] had been disconnected
since sometime after the last leader election vote, and I forgot to
turn it on. A new script, compatible with the new vote mechanism, has
been put into place, and tested, so folks can get ballots for active
votes from
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:41:09PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:17:43PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
When and where will the transcript of the DPL candidates' debate
be posted?
At http://vote.debian.org/2002/leadership_debate/, when someone forwards the
logs
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Norbert == Norbert Veber wrote:
Norbert Thats very strange. So if I only consider one candidate vorthy
Norbert of a vote, and fill in just one square, my vote means nothing?
Norbert That dosent seem right :)
It makes sense if you understand how Concorde voting
Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thats very strange. So if I only consider one candidate vorthy of a
vote, and fill in just one square, my vote means nothing? That dosent
seem right :)
The code Manoj posted seems to match your intuition rather than Ben's
description:
# On , expect
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 00:06, Ben Collins wrote:
I just want to remind everyone about how this voting works under the
hood. You are better off not leaving options blank, for the simple
reason that leaving it blank means your vote does not count against that
option (the things you vote for are
On Mar 27, Bdale Garbee wrote:
The discussion after last year's vote on this topic seemed to lead to a
concensus that we should treat any unmarked choices as being of equal
preference, at a preference level below any marked entries.
1. The method is called Condorcet, even though we all
Norbert == Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Norbert Thats very strange. So if I only consider one candidate
Norbert vorthy of a vote, and fill in just one square, my vote means
Norbert nothing? That dosent seem right :)
I would not say it meant nothing. It means that you
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:06:10AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I just want to remind everyone about how this voting works under the
hood. You are better off not leaving options blank, for the simple
reason that leaving it blank means your vote does not count against that
option (the things you
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:23:52AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
[vote deleted]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQA8oVIyYApVP/ZmyR0RAv5pAJ4s14oMt9Hlqa/bFP0mZ5Qo/tgaUACfeSCR
3qSDTlQpg9rhhJx08Q9UuR4=
=7aHi
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 02:00:44AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
I'm more interested in casual security (not broadcasting my vote to the
world) than cryptographic security. People interested enough to take
the time to crack my vote are either obsessive or need to get out more.
Neither of which
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 03:07:20PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
You can't have it both ways! The standard Debian answer to a good
idea is 'show us the code'. Well, in this case, the code was written
and demonstrated. It would obviously not be difficult to integrate it
with the
Previously tony mancill wrote:
I'm not sure if there's any point in the casual security. I seem to
recall all of the votes from last year's election being published in some
public place after the voting was complete.
Which was a mistake, DPL votes are not public (see the constitution).
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 01:41 AM, Anthony Towns wrote:
BTW, if there are only a couple of unknowns about the original message
(like, say, the order of the numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4), it's pretty
straightforward to recover it from just a cryptographic signature.
Yep. Brute force is quite
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 02:56:47AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:06:10 -0500
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One side affect of this is that if you only put a number next to one
person's name, and leave the rest blank, your vote pretty much means
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:17:43PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
When and where will the transcript of the DPL candidates' debate
be posted?
At http://vote.debian.org/2002/leadership_debate/, when someone forwards the
logs to debian-www...
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Bob Hilliard wrote:
When and where will the transcript of the DPL candidates' debate
be posted?
http://beta.hardware.no/~tfheen/debian-debate.{html,txt}
Regards,
Joey
--
The only stupid question is the unasked one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:17:43PM -0500, Bob Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
When and where will the transcript of the DPL candidates' debate
be posted?
It's been posted here for several days:
http://dopey.debian.net/debian-debate_20020324.html
Daniel
--
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 19:17, Bob Hilliard wrote:
When and where will the transcript of the DPL candidates' debate
be posted?
It's allready been posted, since I read it yesterday (Maybe the day
before even).
I don't know the URL, but it was posted on www.debianplanet.org
--
Mark Janssen
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 19:17, Bob Hilliard wrote:
When and where will the transcript of the DPL candidates' debate
be posted?
It's allready been posted, since I read it yesterday (Maybe the day
before even).
I don't know the URL, but it was posted on www.debianplanet.org
--
Mark Janssen
Dear IT Manager,
Have you ever thought of redesigning your website
or creating an on-line database, in short, anything
that has to do with software development, this offer
is right for you. Our highly skilled off-shore
programmers are capable and ready to develop any
of your e-commerce
Hi,
The script behind [EMAIL PROTECTED] had been disconnected
since sometime after the last leader election vote, and I forgot to
turn it on. A new script, compatible with the new vote mechanism, has
been put into place, and tested, so folks can get ballots for active
votes from
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:41:09PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:17:43PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
When and where will the transcript of the DPL candidates' debate
be posted?
At http://vote.debian.org/2002/leadership_debate/, when someone forwards the
logs to
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:07:31PM -0500, Norbert Veber wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:06:10AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I just want to remind everyone about how this voting works under the
hood. You are better off not leaving options blank, for the simple
reason that leaving it blank
Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thats very strange. So if I only consider one candidate vorthy of a
vote, and fill in just one square, my vote means nothing? That dosent
seem right :)
If that's what you think, then you rank them thus:
1) Your candidate
2) None of the above
3 and 4)
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Norbert == Norbert Veber wrote:
Norbert Thats very strange. So if I only consider one candidate vorthy
Norbert of a vote, and fill in just one square, my vote means nothing?
Norbert That dosent seem right :)
It makes sense if you understand how Concorde voting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Norbert Veber) writes:
One side affect of this is that if you only put a number next to one
person's name, and leave the rest blank, your vote pretty much means
nothing.
Thats very strange. So if I only consider one candidate vorthy of a
vote, and fill in just one
Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thats very strange. So if I only consider one candidate vorthy of a
vote, and fill in just one square, my vote means nothing? That dosent
seem right :)
The code Manoj posted seems to match your intuition rather than Ben's
description:
# On , expect
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 00:06, Ben Collins wrote:
I just want to remind everyone about how this voting works under the
hood. You are better off not leaving options blank, for the simple
reason that leaving it blank means your vote does not count against that
option (the things you vote for are
32 matches
Mail list logo
